Comparison And Selection Of Self-Esteem Instruments

Comparison and Selection of Self Esteem Instruments Based on Technical Data

Comparison and Selection of Self-Esteem Instruments Based on Technical Data

Please post your responses to the following questions: Test A: 40 items. Description: Measure of self-esteem. Scales: Total Score, General Self-Esteem, Social Self-Esteem, Personal Self-Esteem. Reliability: Test-retest r = .81; coefficient alphas for the scales are .75, .78, .57, and .72. Validity: Content—developed construct definitions, table of specifications, expert evaluations; Convergent—correlated with Coopersmith’s Self-Esteem Inventory (r = .41); Discriminant—correlated with Beck Depression Inventory (r = .05); factor analysis shows subscales as dimensions of self-esteem. Homogeneity: General scale correlates with Social (.67), Personal (.79), and Total (.89). Test B: 117 items. Scales include global self-esteem, competence, lovability, likability, self-control, personal power, moral self-approval, body appearance, body functioning, identity integration, and defensive self-enhancement. Reliability: Test-retest ranges from .65 to .71; coefficient alphas are .71 to .77. Validity: Content—based on a hierarchical model; Convergent—correlated with Self-Concept and Motivation Inventory (r = .25), and Eysenck Personality Inventory (r = .45); Discriminant—correlated with Hamilton Depression Inventory (r = .19).

Paper For Above instruction

Based on the technical data presented, I would choose Test A over Test B for assessing self-esteem. Several factors influence this decision, including reliability, validity, comprehensiveness, and relevance to the construct. Test A demonstrates a higher test-retest reliability (r = .81) compared to the range seen in Test B (r = .65 to .71), indicating that it produces more consistent results over time. Reliability is crucial in psychological measurement as it ensures that the instrument accurately reflects stable traits (Sheperis, Drummond, & Jones, 2020). Furthermore, the internal consistency of Test A's scales, with alphas ranging from .57 to .78, and an overall total score auxiliary coefficient of .75, indicates a reliable measure of various self-esteem dimensions. Although some subscales, like the Social Self-Esteem with an alpha of .57, are somewhat lower, they still contribute to the overall reliability.

In contrast, Test B's scales exhibit moderate reliability (coefficients from .71 to .77 and test-retest from .65 to .71), which may impact the precision of measurement. More so, considering validity, Test A evidence includes content validation through expert evaluation and comprehensive content coverage, ensuring the scales align well with the conceptual framework of self-esteem. The convergent validity with Coopersmith’s Self-Esteem Inventory (r = .41) and discriminant validity with Beck Depression Inventory (r = .05) further support its criterion validity (King & Minnaert, 2020). Meanwhile, Test B, although based on a hierarchical model, shows lower correlations with related constructs, which may reflect weaker convergent validity, reducing confidence in its ability to measure self-esteem accurately.

Moreover, the focus on homogeneity in Test A suggests that the scales are well aligned internally, with high correlations among subscales, indicating they tap into related dimensions of self-esteem. Content validity, which involves ensuring the test comprehensively covers the construct, is clearly better documented in Test A, including the development process and expert evaluations, unlike Test B where such details are less explicit. As a Christian worldview emphasizes integrity, truthfulness, and the importance of the whole person (Colossians 3:23), choosing a valid and reliable instrument aligns with biblical principles of honesty and diligent stewardship of psychological resources (Proverbs 22:29).

In considering additional information, I would want to know about the time elapsed between test administrations to evaluate the stability of the measures further. Short intervals may lead to carryover effects, such as practice or memory influences, while long intervals risk maturation effects, where participants' self-esteem may naturally fluctuate due to life events (Sheperis et al., 2020). Also, understanding the cultural, ethnic, and demographic backgrounds of the participants would be essential since self-esteem can be influenced by cultural norms and social environments. Including such data would ensure the instrument's appropriateness across diverse populations and align with the biblical view of respecting individual differences as made in God's image (Genesis 1:27). Overall, considering these factors, Test A appears to be the more psychometrically sound choice for assessing self-esteem in a research or clinical context.

References

  • King, R., & Minnaert, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in psychological testing. Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(3), 245-257.
  • Proverbs 11:14. King James Version. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com
  • Sheperis, C. J., Drummond, R. J., & Jones, K. D. (2020). Assessment procedures for counselors and helping professionals (9th ed.). Pearson.
  • Colossians 3:23. King James Version. Retrieved from https://www.biblegateway.com

Related Assignments