Consider, For Example, What Criteria Are Used In Your Discip

Consider, for example, what criteria are used in your discipline Heal

Consider, for example, what criteria are used in your discipline (Health Science) to evaluate alignment of research components. And in what way will your future research contribute to your identity as scholar-practitioner who is dedicated to positive social change? For this Discussion, you will consider criteria for evaluating alignment among the various components of a research study. You will also reflect on your role as a positive social change agent through research. With these thoughts in mind: Write an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design.

Then, reflecting on the course content, discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change. Be specific and provide example(s). Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style. Resources Walden University. (2015b). Social change. Retrieved from Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2012). When to use what research design. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Paper For Above instruction

In the field of health science, ensuring the alignment of research components is essential for producing credible, impactful studies that can inform practice and policy. Alignment refers to the coherence among the research problem, purpose, questions, methodology, data collection methods, and overall design. When these components are well-aligned, the research can effectively address the core issues and produce valid and reliable findings that contribute to knowledge and social change.

Criteria for evaluating alignment: One primary criterion is conceptual consistency, where the research problem must clearly inform the purpose and guide the formulation of research questions. For example, if the problem pertains to health disparities among minority populations, the research questions should specifically explore these disparities in relation to the targeted health outcomes. Additionally, the choice of research design and data collection methods must be appropriate for the questions posed. Qualitative methods might be suitable for exploring lived experiences of health disparities, while quantitative methods could be more appropriate for measuring the prevalence of certain health conditions (Vogt, Gardner, & Haeffele, 2012).

Another criterion is methodological coherence, which ensures that the data collection approach aligns with the research design and questions. For instance, if a study aims to understand patient perceptions of a new health intervention, focus groups or interviews would be appropriate data collection methods. Conversely, using surveys in this context might be less suitable unless they are designed to gather perceptual data. The data analysis strategies should also match the type of data collected—qualitative data should be analyzed thematically or narratively, while quantitative data require statistical analysis (Vogt et al., 2012).

Furthermore, alignment extends to ethical considerations and feasibility. Ethical protocols must be integrated into data collection methods, particularly when working with vulnerable populations, ensuring confidentiality and informed consent. Feasibility refers to the practicality of implementing the methods within resource constraints, timelines, and participant accessibility. Proper alignment across these criteria ensures that the research is methodologically sound and ethically responsible, contributing to its validity and social relevance.

Reflecting on how my future research can support positive social change, I recognize that robust research grounded in sound principles can influence health policies and community health initiatives. For example, studying barriers to vaccination uptake among underserved populations could inform targeted interventions and inform policymakers on effective resource allocation. As a scholar-practitioner, I aim to leverage research findings to advocate for equitable healthcare access, thereby contributing to social justice. By maintaining alignment in my research components, I will ensure my work is credible and actionable, ultimately fostering positive social change (Walden University, 2015b).

My newly acquired research skills enable me to critically evaluate existing studies for their alignment and robustness, empowering me to design my own research that is methodologically rigorous and socially impactful. For instance, applying mixed-methods designs can reveal both statistical trends and contextual insights, fostering comprehensive understanding and more effective interventions. Such skills position me to be an agent of change by producing evidence that can influence health policies and improve outcomes for marginalized populations.

References

• Vogt, W. P., Gardner, D. C., & Haeffele, L. M. (2012). When to use what research design. Guilford Press.
• Walden University. (2015b). Social change. Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2018). Practical research: Planning and design. Pearson.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Wolters Kluwer.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage publications.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2011). The practice of qualitative research. Sage publications.