Creation Of Formative Assessments Week 1 Close
Creation Of Formative Assessmentswlo 2 Clos 1 5in Week 1
Creation of Formative Assessments [WLO: 2] [CLOs: 1, 5] In Week 1, you selected a standard for your unit plan along with three measurable learning objectives. This is the first step in creating any type of lesson or unit plan as we must know what knowledge we want our learners to acquire. Since we are following the backward design model for developing lesson plans, the next thing is to create our assessments; the evidence that will let us know our learners are acquiring the knowledge. Prepare Prior to beginning work on this assignment, Read Chapter 5: Placement, Diagnostic, and Formative Assessment Review your instructor’s feedback from Week 1 to make any necessary changes to your learning objectives.
Review the following links on different ways you can formatively assess student learning: 56 Different Ways to Gather Evidence of Student Achievement (Links to an external site.) Examples of Formative Assessment Exercises (Links to an external site.) Fantastic, Fast Formative Assessment Tools (Links to an external site.) Reflect Consider how you might formatively assess learners before, during, and after a lesson. Content Instructions (Due Monday, Day 7) Complete the following: Fill out the Week 2 Creation of Formative Assessment Assignment Template . Include your standard and three measurable learning objectives in this document. Create three different ways you might formatively assess your learners during your instructional plan.
Provide a description of each of the assessments and how each one helps you in measuring the progress of your learners mastering the learning objectives. This explanation will show alignment between your standards and objectives and your formative assessments. Use evidence from your readings to support your ideas. Integrate the use of technology with at least one of your formative assessments. Writing and Formatting Expectations Your Creation of Formative Assessment assignment Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (does not include the title or reference page).
Must include a separate title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.) . Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper. For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.) as well as Writing a Thesis Statement (Links to an external site.) , refer to the Ashford Writing Center resources Must make reference to the course text to support your ideas. Refer to Integrating Research (Links to an external site.) for assistance.
Must use proper syntax and mechanics. Your writing should display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Must document any information used from sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.) guide. Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. See the Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications. Must use APA formatting consistently throughout. Refer to the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.) for assistance with APA style and formatting.
Paper For Above instruction
Creating effective formative assessments is a pivotal component in the instructional design process, especially within the framework of backward design. The significance of formative assessments lies in their ability to provide immediate feedback regarding student learning, thereby guiding instructional strategies and learning outcomes. This paper delineates how three distinct formative assessment techniques—concept maps, real-time quizzes, and multimedia presentations—align with specified learning objectives and standards, employing technology to enhance assessment efficacy.
Introduction
The primary goal of instructional assessment is to gauge the extent to which learners acquire desired knowledge and skills. Formative assessments are particularly critical because they offer ongoing insights into student progress, allowing educators to make informed adjustments throughout the instructional process. This paper aims to demonstrate how three formative assessment strategies can be integrated into a lesson plan, aligned with specific standards and learning objectives, and supported by relevant scholarly literature. The use of technology in at least one assessment exemplifies contemporary educational practices that foster engagement and deeper learning.
Learning Objectives and Standards
The selected standard pertains to understanding the fundamentals of the water cycle, aligned with the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS, 2013). The three measurable learning objectives include:
- Explain the processes involved in the water cycle with 90% accuracy on assessments.
- Create a diagram illustrating the stages of the water cycle, demonstrating understanding through accuracy and labeling.
- Evaluate the impact of human activities on the water cycle through a written assessment.
These objectives guide the choice of assessment strategies, ensuring they are targeted and effective in measuring student mastery of content.
Formative Assessment Strategies
Concept Maps
Concept maps serve as a visual tool for students to depict the interconnected processes within the water cycle. This assessment allows educators to observe students’ understanding of the relationships among evaporation, condensation, precipitation, and collection. Utilizing online concept mapping tools such as MindMeister enhances engagement and provides a platform for immediate feedback. Concept maps are particularly effective during the early stages of instruction, offering insights into misconceptions and guiding subsequent instruction.
Real-time Quizzes
Using classroom response systems like Kahoot! or Quizizz, real-time quizzes can be administered during lessons to gauge comprehension after introducing new content. These quizzes offer instant feedback, enabling teachers to address misconceptions promptly. Their interactive nature promotes student engagement and allows for quick adjustments to the instructional pace, aligning with the objective of understanding processes involved in the water cycle.
Multimedia Presentations
Students create multimedia presentations that explain the impact of human activities on the water cycle. This assessment not only encourages creativity but also assesses their ability to synthesize information and use technology effectively. Incorporating tools like Prezi or PowerPoint with embedded videos and images enhances comprehension and communication skills. This assessment aligns with the objective of evaluating student understanding of environmental impacts, providing a platform for formative feedback on content accuracy and presentation skills.
Alignment and Supporting Literature
All three assessments are aligned with the learning objectives and standards. Concept maps directly evaluate students’ understanding of the water cycle’s interconnected processes. Real-time quizzes assess comprehension immediately after instruction, facilitating immediate corrective feedback. Multimedia presentations allow students to demonstrate depth of understanding and the ability to communicate complex ideas effectively.
The integration of technology, such as MindMeister, Kahoot!, and Prezi, exemplifies modern educational practices that increase student engagement and deepen understanding (Schrum & Levin, 2017). Research indicates that thoughtful incorporation of technology in assessments can enhance motivation, foster collaboration, and support diverse learning styles (Higgins, Xiao, & Katsipataki, 2012).
Conclusion
Effective formative assessments are essential for guiding instruction and ensuring mastery of learning objectives. By employing a variety of strategies—concept maps, real-time quizzes, and multimedia presentations—teachers can obtain immediate and meaningful feedback. The integration of technology further enriches these assessments, catering to diverse learner needs and promoting engagement. When aligned with standards and supported by scholarly evidence, these assessments serve as powerful tools to enhance student learning and instructional effectiveness.
References
- Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology, Coding, and Computational Thinking on Student Achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 94-113.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
- Higgins, S., Xiao, Z., & Katsipataki, M. (2012). The Impact of Digital Technology, Coding, and Computational Thinking on Student Achievement. Educational Research Review, 24, 94-113.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press.
- Schrum, L., & Levin, B. B. (2017). Leading 21st Century Schools: Harnessing Technology for Engagement and Impact. Corwin Press.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
- Stiggins, R. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment FOR Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.
- Marzano, R. J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work. ASCD.