Cultures Comparison Worksheet This Worksheet Has Been Made A

Cultures Comparison Worksheet This worksheet has been made available to you to ensure you understand the design of this assignment

This assignment measures your knowledge of comparative domestic violence (DV) between present-day American society to that of four other cultures. It also provides you the ability to demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard American English using the American Psychological Association (APA) format. Cultures, in this case, is defined as those nations outside the borders of the United States. They may or may not have the same domestic violence issues.

Your task is to find four domestic violence problems which all your examples have in common! This will require the following: 1. Researching American DV problems 2. Choosing four other countries to study and studying their DV problems. 3. Finding four DV problems all five countries have in common 4. Explaining such per the outline included here 5. Arriving at a conclusion 6. Providing a minimum of three references besides your classroom text Please remember to refer to your grading rubric with any questions you may have about the expectation level for the assignment. Check your Assignment Guide for further details. Do not hesitate to contact your instructor with any specific questions you may have.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Domestic violence (DV) remains a pressing social issue worldwide. Although cultural contexts influence the forms and responses to DV, certain problems are consistent across nations. This paper compares domestic violence issues in present-day American society with four other selected countries—each representing diverse cultural backgrounds—to identify common problems. Through comprehensive research and analysis, the paper aims to elucidate shared challenges related to DV, providing insights into global patterns and informing effective intervention strategies.

Section I: Present-day American Society and Domestic Violence

American society faces multifaceted domestic violence challenges. Research indicates that intimate partner violence (IPV) is prevalent, affecting approximately 1 in 4 women and 1 in 9 men during their lifetime (Breiding et al., 2015). The major problems include physical violence, emotional abuse, economic control, and reproductive coercion.

Physical violence entails assaults causing injury, often leading to healthcare costs and emotional trauma. Emotional abuse involves manipulative behaviors undermining victims' self-worth. Economic control restricts financial independence, trapping victims in abusive relationships. Reproductive coercion includes birth control sabotage and forced pregnancy (Futures Without Violence, 2020).

This complex landscape underscores the need for robust legal protections, public awareness, and accessible support services.

Section II: Comparative Culture #1 (e.g., India)

India’s cultural fabric influences the manifestations and responses to DV. The prevalent issues mirror those in the United States—physical assault, emotional manipulation, economic dependence, and reproductive control (Mitra & Samanta, 2013). Societal norms often stigmatize victims, discouraging reporting. Dowry-related violence and familial pressures compound the problem.

Despite legal frameworks, enforcement inconsistencies and cultural resistance hinder progress. Community awareness initiatives and legislation such as the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (2005) aim to address these challenges. However, cultural stigma persists as a barrier to victim support and justice.

Section III: Comparative Culture #2 (e.g., Nigeria)

Nigeria similarly grapples with core DV issues—domestic physical violence, psychological abuse, financial intimidation, and forced initiation into early marriages (Adewuyi et al., 2014). Patriarchal norms and traditional practices can exacerbate these issues. Victims often face societal blame, and legal enforcement remains challenging due to resource limitations.

Efforts by NGOs and government policies focus on raising awareness and providing shelter and support. Cultural barriers often impede victims’ willingness to seek help, emphasizing the need for community-based interventions sensitive to local customs.

Section IV: Comparative Culture #3 (e.g., Japan)

In Japan, DV challenges include physical abuse, emotional coercion, financial dependence, and social stigma (Kawasaki et al., 2016). The cultural emphasis on harmony and shame can discourage victims from reporting abuse. Legal protections exist, but social attitudes pose hurdles to intervention.

Community resources and hotline services are expanding, yet pervasive societal attitudes continue to hinder victims’ empowerment. Education and awareness programs aim to change perceptions and facilitate reporting.

Section V: Comparative Culture #4 (e.g., Brazil)

Brazil faces issues similar to other countries: physical violence, emotional abuse, economic control, and child or adolescent abuse within domestic settings (Vasconcelos et al., 2019). Favelas and marginalized communities experience higher rates of DV, compounded by economic hardship and social instability.

Legal responses are evolving, including the Maria da Penha Law (2006) which aims to protect women from violence. Nonetheless, cultural machismo and impunity continue to hinder progress, requiring multi-sector collaborations to address root causes.

Conclusion

Across the examined countries, domestic violence manifests through common problems—physical violence, emotional abuse, economic control, and reproductive coercion—despite cultural differences. Societal norms, legal enforcement, economic factors, and cultural stigmas influence these issues. Understanding these shared problems allows for targeted interventions that respect cultural contexts while promoting victim safety and justice. Global collaboration, community education, and robust legal frameworks are essential to reduce DV worldwide.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.).
  • Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Black, M. C. (2015). Intimate partner violence in the United States — 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  • Futures Without Violence. (2020). Domestic violence facts and statistics. https://www.futureswithoutviolence.org
  • Kawasaki, N., Takahashi, S., & Takeda, T. (2016). Domestic violence in Japan: Perspectives and countermeasures. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 1011–1020.
  • Mitra, S., & Samanta, S. (2013). Domestic violence in India: Extent, causes and remedies. Indian Journal of Social Work, 74(2), 179–193.
  • Adewuyi, A. A., Adebayo, A. S., & Oladipo, O. C. (2014). Domestic violence and women's health in Nigeria. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 6(3), 76–84.
  • Vasconcelos, A. C., de Almeida, N. F., & Silva, B. S. (2019). Violence against women in Brazil: A systematic review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 72(4), 108–115.
  • Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, India. (2005).

Related Assignments