Deliverable Length: 850–1100 Words Weekly Tasks

Deliverable Length: 850–1100 words Details: weekly Tasks or Assignments

You have worked at this organization for over 10 years and feel totally unappreciated. You have not received a promotion or pay raise in over 5 years, and you work long days, often taking work home. Your supervisor, who has been with the organization for over 30 years and can almost retire at any time, climbs the staircase in front of your cubicle daily. You notice a portion of the staircase is rotting and are concerned about your safety but choose not to report it because you dislike your supervisor and are unaware if reporting would help. Your supervisor falls down the stairs and sustains serious injuries, leading to his retirement. You learn that you are being promoted to his position, which offers a significant pay increase and the opportunity for a better lifestyle for your family. You are prompted to analyze whether your actions or inactions were legal or ethical, how you would handle the situation if you were the owner of the organization, whether your inaction warrants discipline, and whether your claim to promotion could be justified by entitlement based on ability and tenure.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario presented raises complex ethical and legal questions centered on responsibility, safety, employee loyalty, and professional integrity. At its core, the dilemma involves whether the decision to ignore the potentially hazardous condition of the staircase constitutes an ethical lapse, a legal violation, or both. Furthermore, the subsequent promotion and personal gain provoke reflection on whether personal entitlement justifies unethical or negligent conduct, and how organizational leadership should respond to such incidents.

Assessing the Ethical and Legal Dimensions of Inaction

From an ethical perspective, the decision not to report the rotting staircase reflects a significant moral failing grounded in neglect of duty and concern for safety. According to the principles of corporate social responsibility and occupational health and safety standards (Occupational Safety and Health Administration [OSHA], 2023), employers and employees share a duty to maintain a safe working environment. Failing to report hazards, particularly known dangers like compromised infrastructure, breaches the ethical obligation to prevent harm to oneself and coworkers. The decision to ignore the deteriorating staircase despite noticing its hazardous condition demonstrates a disregard for ethical standards involving care and responsibility (Trevino & Nelson, 2021). Ethical conduct requires individuals to act in ways that prevent foreseeable harm, especially when such harm could result from their own negligence or inaction.

Legally, the failure to report hazardous conditions could also have serious consequences. OSHA mandates that employers provide a safe workplace and that employees have a duty to report immediate hazards (OSHA, 2023). While the liability for infrastructure maintenance primarily rests with the employer, employee inaction can contribute to the severity of accidents and potentially invoke legal liability under premises liability doctrine. By choosing not to report the unsafe staircase—perhaps to avoid conflict or personal repercussions—the employee risks complicity in any injury that occurs. If an incident ensues, the organization could face penalties for inadequate safety mitigation, and the employee might be scrutinized for their role in enabling unsafe conditions.

Personal Responsibility and Ethical Reasoning

Addressing whether the employee acted unethically by not reporting the staircase involves examining moral duties. The employee’s primary moral obligation should be to ensure safety and prevent harm. As a worker, the ethical duty extends beyond personal gain to include the well-being of colleagues and oneself. Choosing to ignore the hazard, especially knowing the risk of a serious injury, contravenes these ethical standards (Kidder, 2005). It demonstrates moral negligence and prioritizes self-interest—obtaining a promotion—over safety and ethical integrity.

If You Were the Organization's Owner: Handling the Situation

If I were the owner of the organization and learned that an employee failed to report a known safety hazard, I would initiate a thorough investigation. Safety protocols must be enforced strictly; neglecting such hazards endangers employees and exposes the organization to legal liabilities. Upon confirming the employee’s inaction, I would consider disciplinary measures commensurate with the severity of the negligence, such as retraining, formal warning, or suspension. Additionally, I would implement measures to prevent future lapses, including regular safety audits and fostering an organizational culture that encourages reporting hazards without fear of reprisal (Weaver et al., 2019).

Promoting safety awareness and responsibility ensures that employees understand their ethical and legal obligations. Moreover, recognizing the organizational importance of safety compliance, I would reinforce policies that empower all staff members to act promptly when hazards are identified. Failing to address the root cause of inaction could jeopardize organizational integrity and safety standards.

Does Personal Entitlement Justify Ethical or Legal Lapses?

The argument that a promotion or raise is owed based solely on ability and tenure—sometimes called entitlement—can be problematic, particularly when it justifies unethical behavior. While tenure and accumulated experience are legitimate factors in personnel decisions, they do not justify negligence or dereliction of duties. Ethical employment practices require individuals to uphold professional standards regardless of personal stakes (Crane & Matten, 2016). Using entitlement as a defense to justify inaction or negligence can erode organizational integrity and foster a culture where safety and ethics are subordinate to personal gain.

In essence, ethical principles emphasize that professional responsibilities should override personal incentives. Upholding safety standards and reporting hazards are part of the moral fabric of responsible employment. Personal entitlement does not grant immunity from ethical standards or legal responsibilities; rather, it should serve as motivation to act ethically and uphold organizational values.

Conclusion

The scenario underscores the importance of ethical conduct, safety responsibility, and organizational integrity. Not reporting the hazardous staircase constitutes an ethical lapse rooted in neglect of duty and safety concerns. Legally, ignoring known hazards can result in liability for both the individual and the organization. As a hypothetical owner, enforcing safety protocols and addressing negligent behaviors would be paramount to protecting employees and the company’s reputation. Personal entitlement based on tenure or ability cannot justify unethical or negligent actions, and fostering a culture of safety and ethical responsibility remains essential. Ultimately, professionalism entails recognizing the moral and legal imperatives to prioritize safety and act responsibly, even when personal gain is at stake.

References

• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical Living. HarperOne.
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2023). Responsibilities and Rights. OSHA.gov.
• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2021). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. Wiley.
• Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (2019). Integrated Organizational Ethics: A Multilevel approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 551–565.