Determine Secondary Data Sources 720308

Determine Secondary Data Sourcesins

Use the table provided to identify at least two possible secondary data sources for each project type listed in the first column. Describe more specifically what your possible project may be for each project type in the second column, including the URL for those sources retrievable from the Web. The project types include:

  • Quality Improvement/Performance Management Project
  • Healthcare Policy Analysis/Policy Development
  • Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Project, Program, Intervention, Services, etc.

Your table should demonstrate thoughtful consideration and include a minimum of 6 scholarly and/or professional data sources. Length is 1-2 pages, excluding the title page; a reference page is not needed. Ensure your response reflects graduate-level writing and APA standards.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of identifying appropriate secondary data sources is critical for conducting thorough and credible research in healthcare and public safety projects. Secondary data sources are existing data collected by others that can be utilized to support project objectives, analysis, and decision-making processes. Selecting relevant, reliable, and current sources enhances the quality and validity of the project. This paper discusses potential secondary data sources applicable to three specific project types—quality improvement, healthcare policy analysis, and program evaluation—and provides the rationale for their selection, supported by scholarly references.

Quality Improvement/Performance Management Project

For quality improvement projects within healthcare systems, secondary data sources such as the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) and the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) are invaluable. HCUP (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2021) offers comprehensive hospital inpatient and emergency department data, which can help identify trends in patient outcomes, readmission rates, and hospital performance metrics. The URL is https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/. NDNQI (American Nurses Credentialing Center, 2022) provides data on nursing-sensitive indicators, allowing healthcare administrators to evaluate nursing practices’ impact on patient care quality. The URL for NDNQI is https://www.nursingquality.org/. These sources facilitate benchmarking, performance monitoring, and targeted interventions to improve healthcare quality.

Healthcare Policy Analysis/Policy Development

In policy analysis and development projects, government repositories such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) serve as rich secondary data sources. CMS (2023) provides policy documents, reimbursement data, and health statistics critical for analyzing the implications of healthcare policies on access and quality. The URL is https://www.cms.gov/. WHO (2023) offers global health data, policy reports, and disease burden statistics pertinent to international health policy development. The URL is https://www.who.int/data. These sources support comprehensive policy analysis by providing contextual data, fostering evidence-based policymaking.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Project, Program, Intervention, Services, etc.

For evaluating program effectiveness, sources like the National Evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Culture of Health and the CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) are instrumental. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2021) provides reports and data on health initiatives' outcomes, ideal for assessing intervention impacts. The URL is https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research.html. BRFSS (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022) supplies behavioral health data, including surveys on health risk behaviors, chronic conditions, and preventive health practices, accessible at https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/. These sources enable evaluators to measure program impact, inform improvements, and justify continued investment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, selecting credible secondary data sources enhances project rigor and outcomes. For quality improvement, hospital and nursing data repositories are essential. Policy development benefits from governmental and international health data. Program evaluation requires outcome and behavioral data from reputable evaluation studies and surveillance systems. Thoughtful selection of these sources, grounded in scholarly and professional standards, underpins effective research and decision-making in public health and safety initiatives.

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/
  • American Nurses Credentialing Center. (2022). National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). https://www.nursingquality.org/
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Evaluation Reports. https://www.cdc.gov/evaluation/
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Data & Research. https://www.cms.gov/data
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2021). Research & Reports. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research.html
  • World Health Organization. (2023). Global Health Data. https://www.who.int/data