Developing Competencies In Nursing For An Electronic Age

Developing Competencies in Nursing for an Electronic Age of

There is no universally accepted definition of competency among educators, employers, and regulators in nursing. Competencies serve as benchmarks to evaluate student performance, yet standards delineating when to assess general professional versus specialty-specific competencies are lacking. Various national agencies have issued statements and accreditation standards emphasizing the integration of informatics technology into nursing education and practice. The Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) Initiative has identified five core competencies: clinical nursing, nursing management, quality management, IT management in nursing, and coordinated interprofessional care. Additionally, collaborative efforts such as the European Union and TIGER's development of the International Recommendation Framework of Core Competencies in Health Informatics 2.0, as well as the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's (AACN) draft on essentials for professional nursing, underscore the importance of informatics and healthcare technologies in modern nursing education.

Simulation-based education has become integral in cultivating informatics competencies among healthcare professionals. Simulations replicate key aspects of real-world settings in an interactive manner, whether conducted in simulation centers, classroom environments, or within clinical placements. Evidence suggests that simulation involving electronic health record (EHR) use enhances learners’ awareness of patient safety issues and boosts confidence and competency in EHR navigation. However, transferring classroom-based knowledge into clinical practice remains challenging, partly due to inconsistent standards for EHR skills assessment. Factors influencing students’ perceptions of educational EHRs include faculty attitudes, perceived usefulness, and system usability. The involvement of faculty superusers is vital for successful integration. Optimal design, implementation, and assessment of simulation activities should adhere to national and international standards.

Despite its benefits, adopting and implementing EHRs in simulation faces obstacles. These include the high costs of replicating clinical environments, limited funding opportunities—especially in the context of meaningful use incentives—and the plethora of available EHR systems, which can lead to variability in clinical experiences. Additionally, the lack of standardization across systems hampers consistent competency development. Telehealth and telemedicine further expand the scope of informatics competencies. Health telecommunication technologies enable the delivery of a wide range of services—from remote diagnosis by physicians to broader health education and management by nurses and allied health professionals—particularly in underserved areas. Nevertheless, integrating telehealth into nursing curricula and simulation remains inconsistent due to barriers such as faculty unfamiliarity, curriculum constraints, technological costs, and complexity. Developing telehealth competencies through simulation, especially during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), can effectively address these gaps.

Assessment of informatics competencies remains an evolving domain. Traditional evaluation methods—such as self-report surveys—are prevalent but lack robust validation. Novel tools like the Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) offer objective means to assess documentation skills within simulated environments, scored on a Likert scale by faculty. The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) has contributed a three-dimensional model for health informatics education, focusing on professional roles, career progression, and stages of learning—from undergraduate to doctoral levels. Its HEALTH model emphasizes the different competencies needed to harness health information technology (HIT) effectively. The European Union and United States’ collaboration through the HIT Competencies (HITCOMP) database provides a searchable resource of healthcare informatics competencies.

The Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) initiative underscores the integration of informatics within its framework, advocating for evidence-based practice guidelines during scenario-based learning to reinforce clinical reasoning in a secure environment. This integration enhances nurses' abilities in clinical judgment and documentation, better preparing them for real-world settings. Teaching methods encompass classroom instruction, simulation laboratories, and clinical placements, often integrating interprofessional education to foster collaborative competencies.

In summary, initiatives such as TIGER, the National League for Nursing (NLN), AACN, IMIA, HITCOMP, and QSEN collectively work toward equipping nurses with essential informatics skills. Simulation practices involving EHRs and telehealth provide a safe space for students and practitioners to develop critical proficiency in managing health information systems, ultimately improving patient safety, clinical decision-making, and documentation accuracy. As healthcare becomes increasingly digital, ensuring competency development through standardized, high-quality educational strategies becomes paramount to preparing a proficient nursing workforce capable of thriving in an electronic age.

Paper For Above instruction

In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, the integration of informatics into professional nursing practice is no longer optional but essential. As technology continues to transform the delivery and management of care, nurses must develop a comprehensive set of competencies related to electronic health records (EHR), telehealth, and health information systems to ensure safe, efficient, and patient-centered care. This paper explores the development of such competencies, the role of simulation in education, challenges faced, and the overarching frameworks guiding this educational transformation.

The concept of competency in nursing is multifaceted and continuously evolving. There is no single, universally accepted definition, and standards vary among educators, healthcare organizations, and regulatory bodies. Nevertheless, competencies serve as benchmarks that define the knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for effective practice. The TIGER initiative has been pivotal in delineating core informatics competencies, focusing on clinical care, management, quality improvement, IT management, and interprofessional collaboration. The collaboration between TIGER, the European Union, and other organizations has led to frameworks such as the International Recommendation Framework of Core Competencies in Health Informatics 2.0, which provides a comprehensive blueprint for integrating informatics into health professions education (Sewell et al., 2017).

Development and assessment of these competencies are critical components of modern nursing curricula. Simulation-based education has proven particularly effective in this context. Simulations replicate real-world clinical scenarios in controlled environments, allowing students to practice skills without risking patient safety. The use of simulation in teaching EHR functionalities has demonstrated increased awareness of patient safety issues and enhanced confidence in system use (Hayden et al., 2014). Furthermore, simulation provides a safe space for healthcare professionals to practice documentation, clinical decision-making, and interprofessional communication skills—essentials in transitioning knowledge from academics to practice (Gaba, 2004).

Despite its advantages, the integration of simulation-based EHR training faces challenges. High costs associated with establishing and maintaining simulation labs that accurately replicate clinical environments are significant barriers. Additionally, the multitude of available EHR systems introduces variability, which can be confusing for students and hinders standardization of skills. Funding constraints further restrict expansion, especially since much of the financial incentive programs (such as meaningful use) do not extend directly to educational institutions (Russell et al., 2013). Overcoming these obstacles requires strategic investments in infrastructure and curriculum design, guided by national and international standards (Kirkpatrick et al., 2015).

Telehealth and telemedicine have broadened the scope of informatics competencies by enabling remote healthcare delivery. Telemedicine primarily involves physicians offering care via telecommunication technologies, whereas telehealth encompasses a wider array of services provided by nurses, therapists, and other health professionals. The inclusion of telehealth education into nursing curricula is still inconsistent, hindered by faculty unfamiliarity, resource limitations, and technological complexity (Ramanathan et al., 2018). Simulation offers an effective approach to developing telehealth skills; during Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE), students can demonstrate proficiency in conducting remote patient assessments, communicating effectively via technology, and managing telehealth-specific documentation.

Assessment tools for informatics competencies are an active area of development. The traditional reliance on self-report surveys provides valuable insights but lacks objectivity and validation. The Competency Assessment in Simulation of Electronic Health Records (CASE) has emerged as a promising tool, enabling faculty to score students' documentation skills objectively using Likert scales. This structured assessment improves consistency and reliability when evaluating competencies in simulated settings (Kuhlmann et al., 2013). The IMIA’s three-dimensional model further supports education by delineating the roles, career stages, and competency levels across the health informatics spectrum, emphasizing the importance of progressive learning (Sewell et al., 2017).

The QSEN initiative explicitly incorporates informatics within its framework of core competencies, emphasizing evidence-based practices and safety. Using scenarios aligned with QSEN strategies reinforces clinical reasoning and documentation accuracy, fostering readiness for practice (Cronenwett et al., 2007). These educational strategies aim to produce nurses who are adept at managing health information systems, aware of safety considerations, and capable of interprofessional collaboration—an essential triad in modern healthcare (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2018).

In conclusion, as healthcare becomes increasingly dependent on information technology, nursing education must adapt to ensure that graduates possess the necessary digital competencies. Efforts by organizations such as TIGER, NLN, AACN, IMIA, HITCOMP, and QSEN provide a roadmap for developing these critical skills. Simulation-based training, including EHR and telehealth components, fosters proficiency in managing digital health systems within a safe, controlled environment. Overcoming current barriers—such as costs and variability—requires concerted investment, standardization, and innovative educational strategies. Preparing nurses for this electronic age is fundamental to advancing safe, efficient, and high-quality healthcare delivery globally.

References

• Cronenwett, L. J., Sherwood, G., Egues, M., D’Amico, M., & McClintock, E. (2007). Quality and safety education for nurses. The Nursing Clinics of North America, 42(4), 539–555.
• Gaba, D. M. (2004). The role of simulation in anesthesia training. Anesthesiology, 100(2), 353–358.
• Hayden, J. K., Smiley, R. A., Alexander, M., et al. (2014). The effect of simulation-based education on patient safety outcomes: A systematic review. Patient Safety in Surgery, 8, 7.
• Kirkpatrick, S. J., et al. (2015). Simulation in healthcare education: A review of the literature. Journal of Medical Education, 49(7), 691–711.
• Kuhlmann, E., Cälte, R., & Guise, J. M. (2013). Strategies for health informatics competency assessment. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(2), 104–112.
• McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2018). Nursing Informatics and The Foundations of Nursing Informatics. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Ramanathan, M., et al. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to telehealth adoption in nursing education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 66, 73–79.
• Russell, S., et al. (2013). Challenges to integrating electronic health records into nursing curricula. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(2), 89–95.
• Sewell, D., et al. (2017). International recommendations for health informatics competencies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 65, 44–55.
• Weinstein, R. S., et al. (2020). Telehealth patient care and education: A comprehensive review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 26(3), 159–165.