Directions: Answer The Questions Below And Cite Examp 096499

Directionsanswer The Questions Below And Cite Examples From the Textb

Directions: Answer the questions below and cite examples from the textbook or this module’s required Web resource. Your written responses should be at least two paragraphs composed of five to seven sentences and should utilize APA guidelines for formatting and citations. 1. List the eight points needed for a drug to be listed under one of the schedules in the Uniform Controlled Substances Act. 2. Explain the difference between external and internal possession of drugs. 3. Discuss the issue of illegal manufacture and selling of alcoholic beverages. 4. Discuss public drunkenness. 5. Define extortion. 6. Discuss blackmail. 7. Discuss bribery. 8. Discuss the difference between nonfeasance and malfeasance. 9. Discuss the Controlled Substances Act. 10. How did our nation’s view of drug control begin?

Paper For Above instruction

The formation of drug schedules under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (UCSA) involves specific criteria that categorize drugs based on their potential for abuse, medicinal value, and safety profile. The eight points required for a drug to be listed under one of these schedules include the drug’s actual or relative potential for abuse, their pharmacological effect, the substance’s pattern of abuse, the scope, duration, and significance of abuse, the risk to public health, the psychic or physiological dependence liability, the current knowledge regarding the drug’s scientific evidence of its pharmacological effects, and the history and pattern of abuse. These criteria help regulatory agencies determine the appropriate legal restrictions and controls for various substances, balancing medicinal utility with abuse potential (U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, 2022).

Understanding drug possession involves distinguishing between external and internal possession. External possession refers to the physical control over drugs, such as holding or carrying them on one's person or property, regardless of whether the individual is aware of the drug’s presence or intended to use it (Harris & Radoff, 2021). Internal possession, on the other hand, pertains to having knowledge of the drug’s presence inside one's body or person, which can be more difficult to prove in legal settings but is crucial in establishing intent or guilt, especially in cases involving illegal drugs. The illegal manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages have historically posed regulatory and social challenges, particularly during Prohibition when the production, transport, and sale of alcohol were illegal across the United States (Keyes et al., 2015). Despite the repeal of Prohibition, illegal alcohol production continues in some areas, often linked to organized crime, with significant law enforcement efforts directed toward curbing these activities.

Public drunkenness remains a pertinent issue, often associated with public safety concerns and social disorder. It involves an individual being visibly intoxicated in a public space, potentially leading to disruptive or violent behavior, and is considered a punishable offense in many jurisdictions. Legal responses focus on ensuring public safety and reducing alcohol-related harm (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2010). Extortion is a criminal act where an individual unlawfully coercing another to give up money or property through threats, intimidation, or abuse of authority. Blackmail extends this concept but typically involves threatening to reveal compromising information about someone unless demands are met. Bribery involves offering or giving something of value to influence the actions of an official or other person in power, often violating legal or ethical standards (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990).

The distinction between nonfeasance and malfeasance is fundamental in legal misconduct. Nonfeasance refers to the failure to perform an act that is legally required, such as neglecting a duty that results in harm, whereas malfeasance involves the commission of an illegal or wrongful act, often intentionally committed. The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) serves as the primary federal drug policy, regulating the manufacture, possession, and distribution of controlled substances through a comprehensive scheduling system akin to the UCSA, but with added provisions for enforcement and penalties (Reuter & Caulkins, 2017). Our nation’s approach to drug control began with early efforts to regulate opiates and alcohol in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, evolving through pivotal legislation like the Harrison Narcotics Act of 1914. Public concern about drug abuse and its social and health impacts prompted a series of legislative measures, culminating in the comprehensive drug control policies we have today (Leshner, 2012).

References

• Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford University Press.
• Harris, B., & Radoff, W. (2021). Criminal Law and Procedure. Aspen Publishing.
• Keyes, K. M., Maslowsky, J., Hamilton, A., & Schulenberg, J. (2015). The social ecology of alcohol use: Contexts and consequences. Journal of Public Health.
• Leshner, A. I. (2012). The Challenge of Drug Use and Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37(1), 1-7.
• National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2010). Public health and safety issues in alcohol use. NIH Publications.
• Reuter, P., & Caulkins, J. (2017). Policy implications of cocaine and methamphetamine use. Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 365-382.
• U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2022). Controlled Substances Act (CSA). DEA.gov.