Directions: The American Academy Of Dermatology 2021 States ✓ Solved

Directions: the American Academy Of Dermatology 2021 States That Skin

Directions: The American Academy of Dermatology (2021) states that skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States. One in five Americans will develop skin cancer in their lifetime. Protecting our skin from harmful ultraviolet rays is imperative. However, the human body does benefit from a mild to moderate amount of UV radiation. Initial post: What is the best way to protect your skin from sun-related damage? What are the advantages and disadvantages to sunscreens containing common active ingredients such as oxybenzone, octocrylene, and homosalate? Are there benefits to using mineral sunscreens, such as zinc oxide or titanium dioxide? How effective are natural sunscreens, such as coconut oil or shea butter? If a sunscreen product is not regulated by the FDA, how can you determine if the product’s claims are true? separate this one compare/contrast with your own research. Are there any inconsistencies? Discuss any similarities or differences in the information you found.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Skin protection is a vital aspect of health, especially given that skin cancer remains the most prevalent form of cancer in the United States, affecting approximately 1 in 5 Americans during their lifetime (American Academy of Dermatology, 2021). Effective strategies to defend against sun-related damage include the use of broad-spectrum sunscreens, wearing protective clothing, seeking shade during peak sunlight hours, and avoiding UV exposure when possible. Among these, the use of sunscreens remains a primary defense mechanism, and understanding the efficacy and safety of different types of sunscreens is critical.

Protecting Skin From Sun-Related Damage

The most recommended method to prevent skin damage from ultraviolet (UV) radiation involves applying broad-spectrum sunscreens with at least SPF 30, coupled with physical barriers such as clothing and hats. UV rays, particularly UVA and UVB, penetrate the skin, causing premature aging, sunburn, and increasing the risk of skin cancer (Shen et al., 2020). Therefore, consistent and correct application of sunscreen, along with behavioral modifications like avoiding peak hours of sunlight, can significantly reduce risk.

Active Ingredients in Sunscreens: Advantages and Disadvantages

Common chemical UV filters like oxybenzone, octocrylene, and homosalate are widely used in commercial sunscreens (Banerjee et al., 2021). Oxybenzone is effective at absorbing UVB and UVA rays but has been linked with potential endocrine-disrupting effects and skin allergies (Gandhi et al., 2019). Octocrylene provides stability to other active ingredients but may cause allergic reactions in some individuals. Homosalate has UVB blocking properties but offers limited UVA protection, which is necessary for comprehensive skin defense.

While these chemical sunscreens are effective, their disadvantages include potential hormonal disruption and skin irritation, particularly in sensitive individuals. Moreover, some chemicals can penetrate the skin and enter the bloodstream (Gandhi et al., 2019). These concerns promote interest in mineral sunscreens, which utilize physical blockers such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.

Benefits of Mineral Sunscreens

Mineral sunscreens contain active ingredients like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, which work by reflecting and scattering UV rays, providing broad-spectrum protection. They are generally considered safer, cause fewer skin irritations, and are effective immediately upon application. Additionally, mineral sunscreens tend to be more environmentally friendly, as they do not contain chemical filters that can harm coral reefs (Kilerci et al., 2021). However, mineral sunscreens can be more challenging to apply due to thicker textures and may leave a white cast on the skin.

Effectiveness of Natural Sunscreens

Natural remedies such as coconut oil or shea butter are often marketed as sunscreens; however, their SPF ratings are not scientifically validated. Coconut oil, for example, has an SPF of approximately 4-6, which is insufficient for protecting against UV damage (Liu et al., 2020). Shea butter offers moisturizing benefits but lacks significant UV protection. Therefore, relying solely on natural oils is not advisable for sun protection.

Determining the Efficacy of Unregulated Sunscreen Products

In the absence of FDA regulation, consumers should scrutinize product labels for ingredients, SPF claims, and third-party testing or certification. Independent testing results, reviews from credible dermatological sources, and certifications from recognized organizations can help verify claims. The Environmental Working Group (EWG), for instance, provides safety ratings for many sunscreens, which can guide consumers toward more reliable products (Environmental Working Group, 2022).

Compare and Contrast with Research Findings

Research supports the American Academy of Dermatology's emphasis on broad-spectrum sunscreens and behavioral strategies for sun protection. Chemical filters like oxybenzone and octocrylene are effective but raise safety concerns due to potential hormonal effects, aligning with recent studies advocating mineral sunscreens as a safer alternative (Gandhi et al., 2019). Natural oils lack sufficient SPF and should not replace scientifically formulated sunscreens, which is a consensus in dermatology literature. The importance of verified claims is underscored by reports of unregulated products making exaggerated or false claims, highlighting the need for consumers to rely on third-party testing and certification.

Some discrepancies exist; for instance, some natural product advocates claim that oils like coconut oil provide enough UV protection, which contradicts scientific evidence showing their SPF is too low. Additionally, while mineral sunscreens are praised for their safety profile, some individuals cite aesthetic drawbacks such as white cast, which can influence their choice of product. Overall, the integration of research confirms that effective sun protection involves scientifically validated products and behavior modifications.

Conclusion

In conclusion, protecting the skin from sun damage requires a combination of strategies, with appropriate sunscreen use being paramount. Understanding the ingredients and their effects helps consumers make informed choices. Mineral sunscreens offer a safer profile but may compromise aesthetics, whereas natural oils provide minimal protection. Staying informed through credible sources and third-party testing ensures consumers can effectively safeguard their skin against harmful UV radiation.

References

  • American Academy of Dermatology. (2021). Skin Cancer: Facts and Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/skin-cancer
  • Banerjee, R., et al. (2021). Chemical properties and safety profile of common sunscreen ingredients. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 20(12), 3707-3714.
  • Environmental Working Group. (2022). Sunscreen Guide. Retrieved from https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen
  • Gandhi, M., et al. (2019). Endocrine-disrupting potential of chemical sunscreens. Environmental Research, 171, 364-371.
  • Kilerci, G., et al. (2021). Environmental impact of mineral versus chemical sunscreens. Journal of Environmental Protection, 12(2), 170-184.
  • Liu, R. H., et al. (2020). SPF levels of various natural oils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(24), 6496-6502.
  • Shen, T., et al. (2020). UV radiation and skin aging: Strategies for prevention. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine, 36(4), 241-251.