Discussion Board Rubric
21 Discussion Board Rubric
Create a 500+ word posting that answers the question posed in the discussion instructions. Be sure to reference course material and at least 1 additional external reference to support your content.
Create a 100+ word reply to one student's post. Support your response with your experience and at least 1 external reference or textbook citation.
Proofread your work prior to posting, ensuring minimal errors.
Paper For Above instruction
The discussion board rubric provided outlines the expectations and grading criteria for both initial posts and responses, emphasizing the importance of substance, support, and proper referencing. In academic discussions, the initial post necessitates a comprehensive and well-supported answer, integrating course material and external references. Specifically, students are required to compose a post exceeding 500 words that directly addresses the discussion question, employing facts, detailed comments, and citations from textbooks and at least one external source to substantiate their statements. This criterion ensures that students demonstrate critical thinking and engagement with course content, enhancing the depth of discussion.
The rubric specifies that the level of support and elaboration distinguishes full, partial, and no credit. A full mark for the initial post is awarded when the post is substantive, well-supported, and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic through proper citation and detailed commentary. Conversely, posts lacking external references or shallow support receive partial or no credit, emphasizing the importance of critical engagement and supporting evidence.
In addition to the initial post, students are expected to respond to a peer’s post with a reply of at least 100 words. This response should be substantive, relevant, and reflect personal experience, supporting it with at least one external source or textbook citation. A thorough reply demonstrates engagement with peers’ ideas, providing constructive feedback or additional insights grounded in evidence.
The final component of the rubric focuses on proofreading. Students are instructed to review their work prior to posting, aiming for minimal errors. Effective proofreading ensures clarity, professionalism, and enhances readability. Full credit is awarded for posts free of errors, while multiple errors can detract from the overall quality and may lower the grade.
Overall, the rubric underscores the importance of critical analysis supported by credible sources, clear communication, and diligent proofreading. These elements contribute to meaningful, academically rigorous discussions that demonstrate understanding and engagement with the course material. Students are encouraged to develop well-supported posts that foster a dynamic learning environment, leveraging external resources to deepen their insights and contribute constructively to the discussion forum.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA Publishing.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
Moore, M. G. (2012). Paideia: Toward a critical theory of online learning. Educational Technology, 52(4), 29-36.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2013). Lessons from the online classroom: The realities of online teaching and learning. Jossey-Bass.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Pearson.
Zhao, Y. (2012). Cultural influences on learning: Why Chinese students excel. Educational Leadership, 23-29.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.