EH 1020 English Composition II Course Learning Outcom 210829

Eh 1020 English Composition Ii 1course Learning Outcomes For Unit V

Implement ideas of the writing situation, genre, and audience learned in English Composition I. Produce an argumentative research paper.

Paper For Above instruction

Effective writing is a cornerstone of academic success and professional communication. In the context of English Composition II, students are expected to build upon foundational skills developed in English Composition I, engaging in more complex and nuanced writing tasks. The primary objective of this assignment is to facilitate students’ ability to produce a well-organized, persuasive argumentative research paper that synthesizes ideas of the writing situation, genre, and audience contextualized within the research topic.

The process begins with selecting a debatable issue relevant to current societal, ethical, or scientific discourses. Students should approach this topic by considering the writing situation—identifying the purpose of their paper and the specific context in which their audience will engage with it. Recognizing the genre of an argumentative research paper entails understanding its formal structure, including the introduction with a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs that support claims with credible evidence, and a compelling conclusion. Audience awareness is critical; students must tailor their language, tone, and evidence to resonate with their readers, persuading them through logical reasoning and evidence-based arguments.

The process of composing an argumentative research paper involves multiple stages: research, outlining, drafting, revising, and editing. Initially, students should gather reputable sources that provide diverse perspectives on their issue and integrate these sources to build a coherent argument. Developing a detailed outline will serve as a roadmap, ensuring the logical flow of ideas and supporting the thesis systematically. During drafting, attention should be given to clarity, coherence, and the effective presentation of evidence. Revising and editing are crucial steps—students must critically evaluate their work for content accuracy, clarity, grammatical correctness, and adherence to formatting guidelines.

In alignment with course learning outcomes, students should engage in reflective practices through peer feedback and instructor comments to enhance the quality of their paper. Understanding the importance of feedback for the drafting process can significantly improve writing efficacy. Additionally, students should be aware of common grammatical pitfalls such as dangling and misplaced modifiers and actively correct these errors during revision.

This assignment emphasizes the importance of a methodical approach to writing, integrating the skills learned in lessons covering understanding editing and revising as a process, the benefits of working from an outline, and the significance of feedback. The final product should demonstrate mastery of argumentative techniques, effective research skills, and the ability to communicate arguments convincingly to a specified audience.

References

• Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2018). They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2016). A Writer's Reference (7th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Lunsford, A. A., & Ruszkiewicz, J. J. (2019). Everything's an Argument (8th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Kuhn, T. (2014). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
• Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL). (2023). Writing an Argumentative Essay. https://owl.purdue.edu
• Moore, P., & Parker, R. (2018). Justice: An Introduction to Jurisprudence (7th ed.). Routledge.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
• Thorne, S., & Mertens, D. M. (Eds.). (2018). Research Ethics in Social Science. SAGE Publications.