Ethical Dilemma: Major Corporations With Overseas Subcontrac

Ethical Dilemma: Major corporations with overseas subcontractors such as IKEA in Bangladesh, Unilever in India, and Nike in China

Major corporations that engage overseas subcontractors often face ethical dilemmas related to labor practices in these regions. Incidents where children as young as 10 are found working in subcontractor facilities have garnered significant negative publicity, raising questions about the ethical responsibilities of the parent companies. Typically, the response involves conducting audits and improving controls to prevent recurrence. In some cases, companies have terminated young workers found in these settings, leading to severe consequences for the families involved. This situation prompts critical examination of the ethics behind such decisions: Was hiring the 10-year-old child ethical? And was terminating the child ethical?

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical considerations surrounding major corporations' involvement with overseas subcontractors are complex and multifaceted. They involve balancing economic, social, and moral responsibilities within the global supply chain. At the core of the dilemma is whether corporate entities have a moral obligation to prevent child labor, even if it is technically legal or culturally accepted in the host country, and how they should respond once such practices are uncovered.

Initially, examining whether the decision to hire the 10-year-old child was ethical requires understanding the context. In many developing countries, child labor is driven by poverty and the lack of social safety nets, prompting families to send children to work in order to survive. If a corporation knowingly or unknowingly hired a child under these circumstances, it raises significant ethical concerns. Such an act may appear to be complicit in exploiting vulnerable populations, especially if employment conditions are unsafe or if the child is deprived of education and a proper childhood. Under international standards, such as those outlined by the International Labour Organization (ILO), child labor is a violation of fundamental rights and is considered unethical, regardless of local customs. Therefore, hiring a 10-year-old child, under conditions that compromise their safety or well-being, is ethically indefensible.

Conversely, one could argue that a corporation might not have been directly aware of the child's age or that the employment practice might have followed local norms. However, corporate responsibility entails due diligence, especially when their supply chains are global and potentially obscure. Ethical business practices demand proactive measures—such as supplier auditing, enforceable codes of conduct, and collaboration with NGOs—to prevent child labor. From this perspective, knowingly hiring a child, or neglecting the verification of age, is considered unethical because it perpetuates exploitation and violates international human rights standards.

Turning to the decision to terminate the child after the discovery, we see another layer of ethical dilemma. From a legal standpoint, companies may argue that they are complying with local laws or contractual obligations—removing the child employee to avoid sanctions or reputation damage. Nevertheless, ethically, the action of termination, especially when it leaves the family destitute, can be viewed as morally callous. It fails to consider the negative consequences for the child's family who depended on that income for their livelihood. The child's community and familial context are crucial in evaluating the morality of the termination.

From an ethical framework grounded in human-centered concerns, the decision to dismiss the child without alternative support is morally problematic. It disregards the company's broader social responsibility to mitigate harm and support vulnerable populations. Ethical business practice would suggest that, upon discovering child labor, the company should have engaged with local stakeholders, provided educational opportunities, or supported transitional arrangements that would enable the child to cease work without impoverishing their family. Simply terminating the child without offering support amplifies the harm, exacerbating poverty and social inequality, and could violate fundamental ethical principles of beneficence and justice.

Furthermore, ethical decision-making in this context should align with international norms advocating for the abolition of child labor and the promotion of ethical supply chain management. Transparency, accountability, and corporate social responsibility are essential in preventing such issues. Moreover, companies should see such situations not solely as compliance failures but as ethical failures that demand comprehensive response strategies—beyond audit reports or superficial controls—to address systemic issues in the supply chain.

In conclusion, hiring a 10-year-old child in a subcontractor facility is inherently unethical under international ethical standards, given the rights and well-being of children. The decision to terminate the child after discovery, especially in the absence of support mechanisms, is also ethically questionable, as it neglects the child's and family's welfare and fails to uphold principles of social justice. Ethical corporate conduct requires proactive measures to prevent child labor, and when violations occur, companies have a moral obligation to respond with compassion and support, rather than purely punitive measures.

References

• International Labour Organization. (2017). Child Labor. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/child-labor/lang--en/index.htm
• Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context. Routledge.
• Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Critical Sociology, 33(3), 105-128.
• Reinecke, J., & Donaghey, J. (2017). The Voluntary Sustainability Standards Ecosystem: Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(1), 3-14.
• Harrison, D. (2003). Child Labor and the Global Economy. New York: Routledge.
• Jaffee, D. (2012). Child Labor, Poverty, and the Global Economy. Social Problems, 59(1), 36-55.
• Turner, L. (2010). Ethical Issues in Global Supply Chains. Business and Society Review, 115(4), 451-463.
• Moog, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Theorizing the Ethical and Unethical in Ethical Supply Chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(3), 1-14.
• Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: Not Whether but How. California Management Review, 45(4), 52-76.
• Wells, D. (2017). Sustainable Supply Chains and Child Labor: Ethical Responsibilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 501-515.