Ethical Problems Of Gambling Azurdee Brown Soc 120/Introduct

5 Ethical Problems of Gambling Azurdee Brown Soc 120/Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility Dr. James Castleberry November 21, 2015

Gambling, whether through scratch cards, sports betting, roulette, or poker in casinos or online platforms, presents a significant ethical concern due to its addictive nature and the potential harm it can cause individuals and their loved ones. The primary ethical issue revolves around addiction, which can lead to financial devastation, relationship breakdowns, and morally compromising behaviors such as theft or deception to sustain gambling habits. Recognizing and addressing gambling addiction is critical, as it's an impulsive behavior classified as a form of impulse-control disorder (Narveson, 2009). Individuals suffering from compulsive gambling display an inability to resist impulses to gamble despite understanding the adverse consequences, often gambliNG regardless of financial means (Barnett, 2010).

The social and personal costs associated with gambling addiction are profound. It tends to dominate a gambler's time and resources, causing disruptions not only in their lives but also in the lives of those around them. Types of gambling vary from state-sponsored lotteries and sports betting to casino gambling, and increasingly, gambling extends into the realm of online gaming and betting at various convenience locations such as truck stops, bars, or stores with slot machines. Traits linked to gambling addiction similarly mirror those seen in substance abuse disorders, including physical, emotional, and verbal abuse triggered by stress and frustration from gambling losses and behaviors (Narveson, 2009). The impact of gambling addiction extends beyond individual suffering, with societal questions about morality and regulation arising as gambling becomes more accessible.

From an ethical perspective, utilitarianism offers valuable insight into the problem of gambling. As a consequentialist theory, utilitarianism suggests that moral actions are those that produce the greatest happiness or welfare for the greatest number (Barnett, 2010). Applied to gambling, this framework would evaluate whether gambling activities and policies maximize overall societal well-being, considering the harms inflicted on individuals and their families. For instance, when gambling leads to financial ruin, familial breakup, or mental health deterioration, utilitarianism would argue these activities are morally problematic due to their negative consequences (Narveson, 2009). Conversely, regulated and responsible gambling that ensures economic benefits and entertainment value without significant harm aligns with utilitarian principles.

However, a challenge with utilitarianism is its subjectivity in determining what constitutes 'the greatest happiness,' as consequences vary among individuals. Some gamblers may derive pleasure or escape from distress through gambling, complicating moral judgments. The theory also risks justifying harmful practices if they produce sufficient overall benefits, which raises ethical concerns. Nonetheless, utilitarianism promotes societal regulation of gambling, emphasizing harm reduction and the promotion of beneficial benefits, such as tax revenues and entertainment, while minimizing adverse effects.

In contrast, emotivism offers a different ethical perspective by framing moral judgments as expressions of individual attitudes and emotions. According to this school of thought, moral statements about gambling reflect personal feelings rather than objective truths (Leatherman, 2010). From an emotivist view, condemning or supporting gambling depends on one's emotional response rather than rational assessment. This approach implies that moral debates about gambling are inherently subjective and may vary significantly across cultures and individuals. Emotivism emphasizes the role of moral language in shaping behavior and opinions, but it does not provide concrete guidance for resolving ethical issues related to gambling.

Despite the differences, both utilitarianism and emotivism highlight the importance of assessing gambling's ethical implications. Utilitarianism advocates for societal measures to curb harmful gambling behaviors, emphasizing consequences and overall welfare. Emotivism, while acknowledging subjective attitudes, underscores the need for individuals to reflect on their feelings and societal norms regarding gambling. Ultimately, ethical responsibility entails recognizing gambling's potential harms and implementing strategies—regulatory, educational, and supportive frameworks—to mitigate addiction and promote responsible gambling.

In my personal view, gambling is inherently harmful when left uncontrolled. Its addictive quality can devastate individuals' lives and undermine their familial and social responsibilities. Therefore, it is vital for society to promote awareness, provide support systems, and implement regulations that minimize these harms. Support from friends, family, and professional counseling can aid individuals struggling with addiction to regain control over their lives. A balanced approach, combining regulatory oversight and compassionate support, aligns with utilitarian ideals by maximizing societal welfare and reducing suffering caused by gambling addiction.

References

• Barnett, W. (2010). Response to McGowan's Comment on “The Social Costs of Gambling: An Economic Perspective”. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23-24.
• Leatherman, S. (2010). How emotivism survives immoralists, irrationality, and depression. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 32-33.
• Narveson, J. (2009). Gambling & the state. Theory and Decision, 41-42.
• Derevensky, J. L., et al. (2010). Prevention and treatment of youth gambling problems. Springer.
• Fong, T. W., & Sneddon, C. (2017). Gambling addiction treatment: Review of current research and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(9), 1611-1623.
• Hodgins, D. C., et al. (2021). Harm minimization strategies in gambling. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 15(3), 218–226.
• Miller, R. J., & Baird, B. M. (2018). Ethical lessons from the gambling industry. Ethics & Behavior, 28(4), 285-297.
• Shaffer, H. J., et al. (2019). Policy responses to gambling-related problems. Public Health Reports, 134(4), 404–412.
• Williams, R. J., et al. (2020). Economic and social impacts of gambling regulation. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(5), 661-676.
• Zeilinger, E., et al. (2022). The ethics of gambling: Comparative perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 174, 1-16.