Ethical Standards And Guidelines Consider The Information Pe

Ethical Standards And Guidelinesconsider The Information Presented In

Evaluate two or three ethical standards from the provided readings that will be relevant to your future work as a psychologist with a specific population. Discuss how these standards relate to your work and what precautions can be implemented to prevent violations during survey research with that population. Incorporate concepts of ethical astuteness, ethical character, and ethical acuity in relation to the selected standards.

Paper For Above instruction

Ethical standards are fundamental to the practice of psychology, guiding professionals in conducting research and providing services responsibly and ethically. As a future psychologist working with vulnerable populations—such as children, the elderly, or marginalized groups—adherence to these standards becomes even more crucial. This paper focuses on three specific standards from the American Psychological Association's (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (2002): standard 3.04 (Freedom of Inquiry and Expression), standard 8.02 (Use of Restrictive Procedures), and standard 10.02 (Informed Consent). I will analyze how these standards are relevant to conducting survey research with this population, outline measures to prevent violations, and connect these practices to the concepts of ethical astuteness, ethical character, and ethical acuity.

Standard 3.04 (Freedom of Inquiry and Expression) emphasizes the importance of fostering an environment where psychologists can freely pursue knowledge and express findings without undue restriction. This standard is especially pertinent when working with vulnerable populations, where the potential for coercion or suppression of findings may be heightened. Ensuring that participants’ rights to contribute genuine insights are protected requires establishing a climate of trust and transparency. As a psychologist, practicing ethical astuteness involves recognizing the importance of safeguarding these freedoms while maintaining scientific integrity. Ethical character manifests as a commitment to honesty and transparency, ensuring that data collection and reporting remain unaltered by personal or organizational biases. Ethical acuity, the ability to anticipate ethical issues, is vital for identifying situations where participants might feel pressured or where findings could be misrepresented to serve organizational interests.

Standard 8.02 (Use of Restrictive Procedures) pertains to the minimization of restrictive or intrusive procedures during research. In studies involving sensitive populations, such as individuals experiencing trauma or with cognitive impairments, it is critical to use the least restrictive and least intrusive methods possible. Precautions include thorough risk assessments, informed consent, and ongoing monitoring of participant well-being. Implementing protocols that prioritize participants’ comfort and autonomy demonstrates respect and reduces the likelihood of harm. Ethical character is reflected in a psychologist's dedication to protecting participant welfare, while ethical astuteness allows anticipation of potential distress and the implementation of strategies to mitigate it. Ethical acuity involves the nuanced understanding of how restrictive procedures might inadvertently violate privacy or autonomy, prompting proactive steps to prevent these violations.

Standard 10.02 (Informed Consent) underscores the necessity of ensuring participants are fully aware of the research’s purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits before participation. Obtaining genuine informed consent is particularly challenging with populations that may have limited comprehension or be susceptible to coercion. Precautions involve designing consent processes that are accessible, culturally sensitive, and ensure comprehension; using plain language; and allowing adequate time for questions. Maintaining transparency and voluntary participation reflects the values of ethical character, fostering trust. Ethical astuteness helps identify potential misunderstandings or coercive circumstances, and ethical acuity allows the psychologist to anticipate issues related to power dynamics or vulnerabilities that could impair free consent.

In conclusion, these three standards—respecting the freedom of inquiry, minimizing restrictive procedures, and ensuring informed consent—are vital in safeguarding the rights and well-being of vulnerable populations during survey research. Applying principles of ethical astuteness, demonstrating strong ethical character, and practicing ethical acuity are essential strategies to uphold these standards effectively. Cultivating these ethical qualities ensures that research is conducted responsibly, with respect for participants’ rights, confidentiality, and dignity, ultimately enhancing the credibility and integrity of psychological research.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. ethical.pdf
  • Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey Research and Societal Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 775–801. Tourangeau.pdf
  • Haverkamp, B. E. (2005). Ethical perspectives on qualitative research in applied psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 146–155
  • Kralik, D., Warren, J., Price, K., Koch, T., & Pignone, G. (2005). The ethics of research using electronic mail discussion groups. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 537–545
  • Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
  • Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher-Ford, L., Long, L. E., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2014). The establishment of evidence-based practice competencies for practicing registered nurses and advanced practice nurses in real-world clinical settings. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 11(1), 5–15
  • Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost, and meaning in work. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24, 608–610
  • Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172–175
  • Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348
  • Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://library.waldenu.edu/

Related Assignments