Examine At Least Two Of The Eras Of Policing And Discuss

Examine At Least Two 2 Of The Eras Of Policing And Discuss Their

Examine at least two of the eras of policing and discuss their main strengths and weaknesses.

Paper For Above instruction

The evolution of policing in the United States can be categorized into various historical eras, each reflecting different philosophies, priorities, and methods of law enforcement. Analyzing at least two of these eras provides insight into their strengths and weaknesses, shaping current policing practices and policies.

One of the earliest eras is the Political Era, which lasted from the mid-19th century to the 1930s. This era was characterized by close ties between police agencies and political entities. Police officers often engaged in favoritism, patronage, and corruption to secure political support. The strength of this era was its flexibility in dealing with local issues and fostering community relationships, albeit often based on personal ties rather than professionalism. However, its main weakness was widespread corruption, abuse of power, and inconsistent law enforcement, which undermined public trust and legitimacy.

The Reform Era, beginning around the 1930s and continuing into the mid-20th century, sought to professionalize policing through the implementation of scientific methods, centralized management, and stricter standards. The focus shifted towards crime control, crime prevention, and improving officer standards. The strengths of this era include the development of professional police training, the establishment of crime laboratories, and the implementation of policies aimed at reducing corruption. Nonetheless, a significant weakness emerged as this era often emphasized a “law-and-order” approach that marginalized community input, leading to an us-versus-them mentality, especially concerning racial and social minorities. This detachment can hinder community cooperation, which is vital for effective policing.

Both eras contributed significantly to the development of modern law enforcement but also reveal challenges that are relevant today. The Political Era’s community-oriented approach faced issues of corruption, while the Reform Era’s professionalism sometimes resulted in alienation from the communities they served. Recognizing these strengths and weaknesses fosters a better understanding of current efforts to balance community engagement with effective crime prevention and enforcement strategies.

References

• Kappeler, V. E., & Gaines, L. K. (2013). Police social control: The history of policing. Routledge.
• Walker, S. (2012). The New World of Police Accountability. SAGE Publications.
• Skolnick, J. H., & Bayley, D. H. (2015). The Politics of Policing: Between Force and Legitimacy. Pearson.
• Maguire, E. R., & Perino, G. (2013). The effects of police organizational structure and management practices on community policing. Journal of Crime & Justice, 36(3), 342-366.
• Cordner, G. (2014). Community policing. In J. M. Worrall & P. W. Farrell (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 420-434). Wiley.
• Lilly, J. R., & Barak, G. (2014). Introduction to Criminal Justice. Sage Publications.
• Petersilia, J. (2015). Policing and community policing. In J. M. Worrall & P. W. Farrell (Eds.), The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 675-690). Wiley.
• Reina, V. & Ruiz, P. (2018). Policing and Society: A Global Perspective. Routledge.
• Bittner, E. (2014). Aspects of police work. Beacon Press.
• Goldstein, H. (2017). Problem-Oriented Policing. McGraw-Hill Education.