Final Exam Case Study: Please Read All Directions Below Befo ✓ Solved

Final Exam Case Study Please read ALL directions below before starting your final assignment

Read the entire case study carefully and then respond to all questions in each of the four scenarios. Develop each answer to the fullest extent possible, including citations from outside resources, where applicable, to support your arguments. Submit your assignment as a separate MS Word document in your assignments folder.

Do not type your answers into the case study document. Include a Cover Page with your Name, Date, and Title of Assignment. Do not include the original questions; use the format: Scenario 1: question 1, etc. Each response should be written in complete sentences, double-spaced, and spell-checked. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins on all sides. Include page numbers according to APA formatting guidelines. Include citations in APA format at the end of each answer. You must submit your assignment to the assignment link by the due date. A missing assignment will be assigned a grade of 0.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The following is a comprehensive response to all four scenarios outlined in the case study involving DRA Performance Solutions (DRA PS) and the development of a virtual training academy for a U.S. government organization. Emphasizing strategic human resource management, the paper discusses staffing strategies, leadership challenges, staff retention, and managing increased workload in a complex project environment.

Scenario 1: Increasing Staff to Complete the First Phase

In the context of DRA PS's initiative, immediate staffing demands are substantial to meet the tight three-month deadline for establishing the virtual training academy. Key positions required include project managers, instructional designers, multimedia specialists, web developers, marketing professionals, and administrative staff. The primary rationale for recruiting these positions stems from the project scope: developing and launching a comprehensive online platform, courseware, marketing materials, and event logistics associated with the academy's initial phase.

The existing recruitment policies at DRA PS emphasize leveraging internal talent, prioritizing the reallocation of current employees, or hiring external talent when necessary. These policies support maintaining a highly qualified talent pool but may also pose challenges such as limited internal candidate availability and lengthy approval processes. The requirement for multiple levels of approval—ranging from project managers to executive leadership—could slow down urgent staffing needs during this critical time.

To address these challenges, proactive measures include establishing clear priority channels for urgent staffing requests, streamlining approval processes for short-term and specialized roles, and leveraging temporary staffing solutions, such as skilled contractors or consultants. Recruitment strategies should focus on utilizing online job boards, industry networks, and leveraging existing internal talent pools. Communicating these strategies through company-wide meetings, email bulletins, and direct manager briefings ensures transparency and expedites the hiring process. Emphasizing the urgency and project significance in external communications will attract candidates aligned with the organization's rapid deployment objectives.

Scenario 2: Impact of Firing the Program Manager on Staffing

The situation with the program manager highlights leadership and communication deficiencies that adversely impacted project milestones. Handling performance issues requires a balanced approach; initial steps should involve direct feedback and coaching to improve the manager’s effectiveness before considering replacement, especially given the managerial role's criticality in coordinating team efforts and maintaining client relations. Had earlier performance management discussions occurred, potential escalation might have been mitigated. Nevertheless, given the evidence of unmet deadlines and poor communication, the decision to replace the program manager aligns with best practices for project success.

Replacing the manager involves identifying internal candidates with proven leadership skills or initiating an expedited external recruitment process via targeted advertising, industry contacts, or staffing agencies specializing in project management roles. While internal promotion may offer quicker onboarding, external recruitment might provide fresh perspectives and requisite experience. To ensure a swift and effective hire, the organization should develop a clear competency profile, leverage existing networks, and utilize screening tools that quickly identify suitable candidates.

Retention challenges include maintaining team morale amid uncertainty, addressing fears of job security, and ensuring continuous engagement. Motivating current staff involves transparent communication about project status, recognizing their contributions despite leadership changes, and offering incentives aligned with the project's success. An effective communication plan should include regular updates, forums for staff to voice concerns, and leadership visibility to reinforce stability. Facilitating cross-training and skill development can also prepare staff for leadership transitions, thereby minimizing disruption and maximizing productivity during the staffing change.

Scenario 3: Staff Reduction amid Contract Changes

The mid-project halt and subsequent staff reductions pose significant challenges in retaining talent and ensuring project continuity. Primary retention issues revolve around job security fears and the organizational response to scope adjustments. Existing policies that prioritize internal talent mobility can be leveraged but may need adjustments, such as offering temporary reassignment, retraining, or voluntary separation incentives to retain key personnel and reduce resignations. Communicating openly about organizational changes, emphasizing the strategic importance of staff contributions, and offering career development opportunities are critical to instilling confidence.

To motivate remaining staff, leadership should recognize their efforts publicly, provide opportunities for skill enhancement, and clarify future project plans. Replacing key personnel who resign may involve engaging staffing agencies, utilizing professional networks, and offering competitive compensation packages to attract qualified replacements quickly. Implementing a robust communication strategy is essential—this includes frequent updates from leadership, individual counseling sessions, and transparent discussions about organizational goals and challenges. Establishing a participative environment where employees feel valued can mitigate the adverse effects of staff departures and foster commitment to project success.

Scenario 4: Managing Additional Workload

The extension of project scope to include new courses within a condensed timeframe presents a scheduling and resource allocation challenge. To effectively hire for seven new teams, a structured recruitment plan should encompass expedited job postings on specialized platforms, industry recruitment agencies, and tapping into professional networks. A clear selection process emphasizing relevant experience, technical skills, and cultural fit is vital. Challenges include obtaining necessary approvals swiftly, which requires pre-established approval matrices and senior management buy-in to prioritizing staffing requests.

Ensuring equitable and competitive compensation involves conducting market analyses, aligning salary ranges with industry standards, and offering performance-based incentives where feasible. To integrate new teams seamlessly, onboarding programs should be accelerated, involving orientation sessions, pairing new hires with experienced mentors, and establishing clear expectations. Performance management should emphasize regular feedback, goal setting, and early recognition of achievements to promote engagement and product quality. Continuous communication with HR, department leaders, and existing team members ensures transparency and cohesive integration.

Overall, proactive planning, stakeholder engagement, and clear communication are essential to managing increased workloads efficiently without compromising product quality or team morale during such demanding projects.

References

• Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 103-114.
• Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2020). Fundamentals of human resource management (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Dessler, G. (2019). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2012). HR competencies: mastering HR practices and functions. Society for Human Resource Management.
• Breaugh, J. A. (2017). Recruitment and Selection: Hiring the Right Person. Routledge.
• Schuler, R. S., Jackson, S. E., & Tarique, I. (2011). Strategic human resource management. Journal of Management, 37(2), 722-740.
• Fitz-enz, J. (2009). The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance. AMACOM.
• Barber, A. E., Wesson, M. J., Roberson, Q. M., & Taylor, S. (2012). Plus one: The hidden benefit of a plus-one system. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 265-283.
• Ulrich, D., et al. (2013). HR from the outside in: Six competencies for the future of human resources. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schermerhorn, J. R. (2019). Management. Wiley.