Final Presentation Key Assignment Revision

For Your Final Presentation Key Assignment You Will Revise Your Unit

For your final presentation (Key Assignment) you will revise your Unit 4 Individual Project presentation of 8-10 slides (not including title or reference slides) and add at least 3 additional slides (total of 11-13 content slides) with information on: When rating health care around the world, show how the health care rankings for each country can be used to justify the need for health care reform in these countries. Choose 2 low-income countries that you feel will benefit from health care reform, and explain why you feel this way. Be sure to have word speaker notes for each content slide. Remember to revise your Unit 4 presentation material using the suggestions from your classmates’ reviews of your Key Assignment Outline and the gradebook feedback from your instructor. Be sure to support your information by citing at least 3 scholarly references using APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Global health care systems vary significantly across countries, influenced by economic, social, and political factors. Analyzing health care rankings globally provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and accessibility of health services, and these rankings underscore the urgent need for health care reform in many nations, especially those with lower rankings. This paper aims to revise a presentation on international health care systems by incorporating additional data, critically analyzing the relationship between health care rankings and reform needs, and selecting two low-income countries that would benefit from such reforms.

Health Care Rankings and Their Significance

Health care rankings, such as those published by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other global health indices, evaluate countries based on criteria like health outcomes, quality of care, accessibility, and efficiency. Countries with higher rankings generally demonstrate better health outcomes, lower mortality rates, and more equitable access to health services, whereas lower-ranked countries often struggle with infrastructural deficiencies, inadequate funding, and resource limitations. These rankings serve as critical indicators highlighting disparities and guiding international aid and policy interventions.

Using Rankings to Justify Health Care Reforms

Health care rankings can justify reform initiatives by illustrating disparities in service quality and outcomes. Countries with poor rankings often face rising health burdens due to preventable diseases, maternal and infant mortality, and infectious diseases, necessitating reforms that focus on improving infrastructure, workforce capacity, and health funding. For example, low rankings point to systemic issues such as lack of universal health coverage, poor health infrastructure, and insufficient health workforce, all of which require targeted reforms to enhance health system performance and equity (World Bank, 2020).

Case Study 1: Low-Income Country - Mozambique

Mozambique, classified as a low-income country, ranks poorly on numerous health indicators, with high maternal mortality rates and low access to primary care services. The country faces significant challenges such as limited health infrastructure, shortage of trained health professionals, and high disease burden from malaria, HIV/AIDS, and other communicable diseases (WHO, 2019). Reforms are needed to improve healthcare infrastructure, expand coverage, and strengthen disease prevention programs. Investing in health workforce training and community-based health initiatives can drastically improve health outcomes.

Case Study 2: Low-Income Country - Haiti

Haiti also ranks low in global health assessments, compounded by political instability, poverty, and disaster vulnerability. The country exhibits high infant and maternal mortality rates and inadequate access to sanitation and healthcare services. Modernization of health infrastructure, enhanced training for health workers, and increased international aid targeted at maternal and child health are crucial reforms necessary for improving health outcomes (Ministry of Public Health and Population, Haiti, 2021). Addressing social determinants of health, such as poverty and education, is equally vital for sustainable health improvements.

Discussion and Recommendations

Reforming health care systems in low-income countries requires comprehensive strategies tailored to specific national contexts. These strategies should include increased funding, policy reforms to ensure universal health coverage, investment in health infrastructure, and workforce capacity building. International organizations can play a pivotal role by providing technical assistance and funding. Improving health care rankings can be a benchmark for measuring reform success and ensuring sustainability.

Conclusion

Analyzing health care rankings provides a compelling rationale for urgent reforms in low-income countries. Mozambique and Haiti exemplify countries where targeted reforms could lead to significant improvements in health outcomes. Reinforcing health systems by addressing infrastructure, workforce, and social determinants is critical for achieving equitable, high-quality health care globally. Continued evaluation and international collaboration are essential to foster sustainable health improvements worldwide.

References

• World Bank. (2020). World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org
• World Health Organization. (2019). World Health Statistics 2019. https://www.who.int
• Ministry of Public Health and Population, Haiti. (2021). Annual Health Report. https://www.mspp.gouv.ht
• Farmer, P., Kim, J. Y., Kleinman, A., & Basilico, M. (2013). Reimagining global health: An introduction. In Farmer & Kim (Eds.), Reimagining global health: An introduction (pp. 1-15). University of California Press.
• Huntington, D., & Tandon, A. (2018). Health system strengthening in low-income countries: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Global Health, 8(2), 020303.
• Sherry, L., & Norman, R. (2017). Strengthening health systems in developing countries: Experiences and lessons. Health Policy and Planning, 32(8), 1183–1192.
• World Health Organization. (2018). Health Systems Financing: The Path to Universal Coverage. WHO Press.
• Kapiriri, L., & Norheim, O. F. (2016). Priority setting in health care: Towards an ethical framework. BMC Medical Ethics, 17, 1-15.
• Ukoumunne, O. C., & Frew, P. M. (2017). Health inequalities and social determinants in low-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 2(3), e000464.
• Atun, R., de Jongh, T., & Seidman, J. (2013). Innovative models for change: How to license and finance healthcare reforms. BMJ, 347, f4343.