Financial Management Article
Financial Management Article
Financial Management Article 1 Financial Management Article Name of Student Name of Instructor Date Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy Purpose of the Article: "The purpose of this paper is to attempt an assessment issue-the quality of ratio analysis as an analytic technique." Scope of the Article: "This paper evaluates the analytical quality of ratio analysis for its potential as a tool in predicting corporate bankruptcy." Classification of the Article: This is an empirical article. Meaning, the information and data was gathered from research. Findings or Inferences of the Article: Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) is a statistical technique that makes it easy to classify and distinguish between two groups. But, the most important aspect is that you can analyze the entire variable instead of doing it individual. Discernment Function and important ratios: · Working Capital/Total assets · Retained Earnings/Total assets · Earnings before Interest and Taxes/Total Assets · Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Total Debt · Sales/Total Assets To establish the best possible model, 6 different tests were used, and these tests are: · Initial Sample · Results Two Years Prior to Bankruptcy · Potential Bias and Validation Techniques · Secondary Sample of Bankruptcy Firms · Secondary Sample of Non-Bankruptcy Firms · Long-Range Predictive Accuracy These tests showed important and significant signs. One of the most important ones is that most of the changes that occurred between years 2-3 prior to their bankruptcy. These also concluded into what's called the Z-score. The Z-score is a score that can predict which firms might go bankrupt. · Z-score > 2.99 "non-bankrupt firms" · Z-score
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Financial analysis plays a critical role in assessing the health and stability of corporations, especially concerning their potential risk of bankruptcy. Among various analytical tools, ratio analysis has emerged as a widely used method for evaluating a firm's financial condition. However, the effectiveness of ratio analysis as a predictive technique has been the subject of ongoing research, seeking validation and enhancement through advanced statistical methods such as Discriminant Analysis. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the analytical quality of ratio analysis for its potential as a tool in predicting corporate bankruptcy, primarily exploring the application of Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) as demonstrated in Altman's seminal research.
Overview of the Article’s Scope
The article under review emphasizes the empirical evaluation of ratio analysis's effectiveness in bankruptcy prediction. It systematically assesses the predictive capabilities of specific financial ratios by applying MDA to distinguish between bankrupt and non-bankrupt firms. The research design involves multiple tests including sample analysis at different time intervals, validation techniques, and robustness checks through secondary samples. The critical goal is to establish a reliable and accurate model that can forecast bankruptcy with high predictability, assisting investors, creditors, and management in strategic decision-making.
Methodology and Data Analysis
The core analytical technique used in the study is Multiple Discriminant Analysis, which allows for the classification of firms based on multiple financial ratios simultaneously. The selected ratios are crucial indicators of a firm's financial stability as they reflect liquidity, profitability, leverage, and market valuation. These ratios include Working Capital/Total Assets, Retained Earnings/Total Assets, Earnings before Interest and Taxes (EBIT)/Total Assets, Market Value of Equity/Book Value of Total Debt, and Sales/Total Assets. The choice of these ratios aligns with their theoretical significance in signaling financial distress.
To develop the predictive model, six different tests were conducted:
1. Analyzing an initial sample of firms.
2. Examining firms two years prior to bankruptcy.
3. Addressing potential bias and validation by testing for overfitting.
4. Using a secondary sample of firms that filed for bankruptcy.
5. Incorporating a control group of non-bankrupt firms.
6. Assessing long-range predictive accuracy over subsequent years.
The results from these tests demonstrated that the ratios and the MDA model could significantly differentiate between firms on the brink of bankruptcy and stable companies. The findings indicate that most significant changes in the ratios tend to occur between two and three years before bankruptcy, providing a valuable window for early detection.
Development and Interpretation of the Z-Score
A central outcome of the research is the development of the Z-score, a composite score derived from the discriminant function that integrates the selected ratios. The Z-score serves as a predictive indicator with specific threshold levels to categorize firms:
- Z-score > 2.99: Non-bankrupt firms with high financial health.
- Z-score
- Z-score between 1.81 and 2.99: A zone of uncertainty or “zone of ignorance,” where predictions are less conclusive.
The Z-score model offers a probabilistic approach to bankruptcy prediction, enabling stakeholders to make informed decisions with varying degrees of confidence depending on the score.
Empirical Findings and Implications
The empirical findings underscore the robustness of ratio analysis combined with MDA in predicting corporate failure. The model's predictive accuracy was validated through multiple tests, demonstrating high specificity and sensitivity. For instance, firms with low Z-scores consistently correlated with subsequent bankruptcy filings, while high Z-scores indicated financial stability.
One of the notable contributions of this research is that it emphasizes the importance of temporal analysis—most crucial changes occur several years before bankruptcy—highlighting the value of continuous monitoring and early warning systems. Additionally, the technique's applicability across various industries affirms its versatility as a diagnostic tool.
Limitations and Further Research
While the findings are compelling, the study acknowledges limitations such as the specificity of certain industries, potential data bias, and the need for ongoing validation with contemporary data. The applicability of the Z-score model has evolved, considering changes in accounting standards, market dynamics, and financial practices. Future research should focus on refining the model, incorporating additional variables, and applying machine learning algorithms to improve predictive accuracy further.
Conclusion
The article convincingly demonstrates that ratio analysis, when combined with Discriminant Analysis—specifically the Z-score—provides a valuable, empirically validated method for predicting corporate bankruptcy. Its high predictive power, combined with ease of computation and interpretability, makes it a practical tool for investors, lenders, and managers. These findings reinforce the importance of quantitative methods in financial risk assessment and underscore the ongoing relevance of Altman's pioneering research in modern financial analysis.
References
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial Ratios as Predictors of Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71–111.
Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 109-131.
Altman, E. I., & Sabato, G. (2007). Modelling Credit Risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US Market. Abacus, 43(3), 312-340.
Hillegeist, S. A., Keating, E. K., Cram, D. P., & Lunstedt, J. (2004). Assessing the Probability of Bankruptcy. Review of Accounting Studies, 9(1), 5-34.
Lahreche, H., & M’rad, R. (2018). Improving Bankruptcy Prediction Models Using Machine Learning Techniques. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(2), 1-20.
Shumway, T. (2001). Forecasting Bankruptcy more Accurately: A Simple Hazard Model. The Journal of Business, 74(1), 101-124.
Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological Developments in Investment Screening. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2-3), 123-143.
Taffler, R. J., & Tashjian, E. (2012). Financial Statement Analysis and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy: Alternative Models. Accounting & Finance, 52(3), 735-756.