First Paper Project: An Ethical Issue That I Would Like To E

First Paper Projectan Ethical Issue That I Would Like To Examine Durin

An ethical issue that I would like to examine during this course is the issue of the use of stem cells in advancing scientific research and medical breakthroughs. The reason that I would like to learn more about this ethical issue is because it is a divisive and contemporary issue that is relevant in both the scientific and political arenas. There are those who feel that the research of stem cells is critical to move forward in curing and eradicating certain diseases, and mitigating large injuries like spinal injuries or injuries that we now treat with amputations.

On the other side of the spectrum, there are groups and individuals who believe that if the use of stem cells in research was legalized and became more widespread, that there would be an increase in abortions, and it shows a disregard for human life. With the amount of knowledge that I have on the subject now, I would say that I side with the scientific community, in that the use of stem cells is in the interest of the greater good.

If we are truly to have respect for human life, I think that we as a species should do all that we can to make our time, and everyone else’s, here on earth as long and enjoyable as possible. Additionally, I think that it is wrong to force your own religious ethics onto the rest of the public through politics. If this country claims to have a separation of church and state, then that should be evident in their policies toward the medical and scientific communities.

Paper For Above instruction

Stem cell research has been a pivotal topic within biomedical ethics, embodying a complex intersection of scientific potential, moral considerations, and policy debates. The ethical utility of stem cell research primarily hinges on its potential to revolutionize treatment modalities for various debilitating diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, and spinal cord injuries. The core of the debate revolves around the moral status of embryos, which are often used as sources for embryonic stem cells, and whether their destruction is ethically permissible for the potential medical benefits.

Proponents argue that the considerable therapeutic potential of stem cells justifies their use in research, especially given the minimally invasive nature of extracting stem cells from adult tissues and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These advancements provide avenues for regenerative medicine without the ethical quandaries associated with embryonic destruction. Furthermore, supporters emphasize that stem cell research has the potential to alleviate human suffering, cure incurable diseases, and significantly reduce healthcare costs in the long run, thereby serving the greater good.

Opponents, however, maintain that life begins at conception, and thus, embryos possess moral and legal rights equivalent to fully developed human beings. They contend that using embryos for research disrespects human dignity and life, equating such actions with moral wrongdoing. This stance is often rooted in religious and philosophical beliefs that emphasize the sanctity of human life from the moment of conception. Critics also express concern that stem cell research may promote a culture that devalues human life and could lead to increased abortions, given the perceived connection between embryo destruction and abortion practices.

Legal and policy frameworks significantly influence the ethical landscape of stem cell research. Countries vary widely in their regulations, with some, like the United States, implementing restrictive policies that limit embryonic stem cell research, while others adopt more permissive stances. The ethical argument has led to the development of alternative methods, such as harvesting adult stem cells and generating pluripotent cells via reprogramming technologies like iPSCs, which circumvent the moral issues associated with embryonic sources.

The debate also touches on the separation of church and state. Critics argue that religious doctrines should not inform public policy, especially in realms like science and medicine where empirical evidence guides progress. Conversely, some maintain that moral and religious convictions are vital in shaping societal norms and should influence policy deliberations. Ensuring that policies respect individual moral beliefs while fostering scientific innovation remains a delicate balance in democratic societies.

Ultimately, the ethical debate surrounding stem cell research underscores the importance of multidisciplinary dialogue, incorporating scientific, philosophical, and societal perspectives. As technology advances, ongoing ethical considerations must adapt, ensuring that the pursuit of medical breakthroughs respects human dignity, promotes social justice, and aligns with democratic values that safeguard individual rights and moral diversity.

References

• Hyun, I. (2010). The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 26, 405-427.
• Lo, B. & Parham, L. (2009). Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research. Endocrine Reviews, 30(3), 204-213.
• Lo, B., & Kim, S. (2014). Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research. JAMA, 311(17), 1735-1736.
• National Institutes of Health. (2017). Stem Cells: Scientific Progress and Future Research Directions. NIH Office of Science Policy.
• Shamieh, S., & Momeni, S. (2020). Ethical considerations of stem cell research: A review. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 28(4), 22668-22675.
• Thomson, J. A., et al. (1998). Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts. Science, 282(5391), 1145-1147.
• Warren, M. (2004). Embryonic stem cell research and the ethics of human cloning. Bioethics, 18(3), 186-202.
• International Society for Stem Cell Research. (2016). Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation. ISSCR.
• Devolder, K., et al. (2014). Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research. Stem Cells International, 2014.
• Yin, H., & Zhang, J. (2018). The Ethical Dilemmas of Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Literature Review. Bioethics, 32(2), 117-124.