For A Healthcare Organization To Be Politically Viable They ✓ Solved

For A Healthcare Organization To Be Politically Viable They Must Have

For a healthcare organization to be politically viable they must have influential stakeholders. In that, the stakeholders must understand limitations and be able to adopt accordingly. In a minimum of 250 words, discuss the following: -Highlight and present one key player/stakeholder (i.e., federal, state, or local) in political health policy in your state. -Choose two state/local/federal healthcare organizations. Then, compare and contrast their political viability in terms of one/more of their health policies -Apply the “method for analyzing political feasibility†to define your key player’s viability.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The viability of healthcare organizations within the political landscape relies heavily on influential stakeholders who understand the constraints of policy environments and can navigate them effectively. In the state of California, one of the most influential political players in health policy is the California State Legislature, particularly the California Assembly and Senate health committees. These legislative bodies shape critical health policies and possess significant influence over healthcare funding, regulatory frameworks, and public health initiatives. Their political viability depends on their ability to balance diverse interests, including those of healthcare providers, patients, insurers, and advocacy groups, all while aligning with state and national priorities.

To illustrate contrasting perspectives within different healthcare organizations, consider the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Kaiser Permanente, a major private health insurer and provider. The CDPH operates primarily as a government agency tasked with safeguarding public health. Its political viability hinges on adequate legislative support and public trust, which can be challenged by funding limitations, bureaucratic constraints, and political pressures relating to public health mandates.

In contrast, Kaiser Permanente maintains significant political viability through its integrated healthcare model and strong lobbying efforts. Its ability to influence health policy stems from its scale, financial resources, and reputation as a trusted provider. When comparing their health policies, such as the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, the CDPH's viability is affected by legislative shifts and public policy support. Conversely, Kaiser may adapt more swiftly due to its direct lobbying and policy advocacy capabilities.

Applying the “method for analyzing political feasibility” involves assessing stakeholders' interests, political power, and available resources. The California Assembly's health committee possesses considerable legislative power, but its viability depends on external factors such as political climate, stakeholder alliances, and public opinion. Their ability to pass health legislation effectively relies on aligning their interests with influential stakeholders like the governor and health organizations. As such, their political feasibility is robust when they maintain strong alliances and public backing, but vulnerable when facing partisan opposition.

In conclusion, the political viability of healthcare organizations is significantly influenced by their access to key stakeholders and their ability to adapt to the prevailing political environment. The California State Legislature exemplifies a key stakeholder whose political effectiveness depends on strategic alliances, stakeholder engagement, and resource mobilization. Similarly, the contrasting models of public and private healthcare entities demonstrate differing levels of political viability influenced by their respective interests, resources, and influence over health policy decisions.

References

• Baker, R. S. (2020). Health Policy and Politics: A Nurse’s Guide. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. (2019). Health Policy and Management. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/health-policy-and-management
• Long, S. H., & Hobbs, B. (2019). Understanding Public Health Policy. Oxford University Press.
• National Conference of State Legislatures. (2021). State Legislative Health Policy Trends. NCSL.org.
• California Department of Public Health. (2023). About Us. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/AboutUs
• Kaiser Permanente. (2023). Policy Advocacy and Public Affairs. https://about.kaiserpermanente.org/advocacy
• Smith, J. A. (2022). Analyzing Political Feasibility in Health Policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 47(3), 375-395.
• Gordon, S. (2020). The Role of Stakeholders in Health Policy Development. Public Health Reports, 135(4), 422-430.
• Thompson, L. (2018). Lobbying and Influence in Healthcare Policy. Health Affairs, 37(6), 956-963.
• Williams, P. (2019). Navigating Political Environments for Healthcare Organizations. Journal of Health Administration Education, 36(2), 63-77.