For This Milestone, You Will Participate In A Discussion ✓ Solved

For this milestone, you will participate in a discussion in

For this milestone, you will participate in a discussion in which you develop a research study design in preparation for your final research investigation and also assist your classmates in refining their own proposed study. What research design are you proposing to address your research question? Explain your reasoning for choosing it. Why is it appropriate? How have you built upon the initial research design ideas you came up with in the Module Two discussion? What new elements are you adding to your research design based on the Module Four Research Gap Worksheet activity? How will your research design be implemented? How will you account for any issues of ethics in your proposed research question?

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

In the field of social science research, designing a robust study to address specific research questions is crucial. This discussion focuses on the development of a research study design that aims to explore social anxiety and its implications. The research design will build upon initial ideas and the insights gained from previous modules to refine methodologies and assess the ethical considerations involved.

Research Design Proposal

The proposed research study seeks to investigate the relationship between Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) and its correlation with real-life negative social events. The primary research question guiding this inquiry is: "To what extent do young adults diagnosed with Social Anxiety Disorder attribute their experiences to antagonistic or non-antagonistic negative social events?" In order to explore this question, a correlational design is proposed.

Reasoning and Appropriateness of Chosen Design

Correlational design is deemed appropriate as it enables measurement of the relationship between variables—specifically, the clinical diagnosis of SAD and the recurring negative social events in individuals' lives. This design allows for the analysis of data collected from questionnaires administered in a controlled clinical environment. By implementing this design, the study will assess the variables’ interdependent nature without manipulating them, thereby maintaining the ecological validity of the findings (Creswell, 2014).

Building Upon Initial Research Design Ideas

The initial research design ideas presented in Module Two laid the groundwork by suggesting a focus on clinical settings and the significance of informed consent. In refining the proposal, new insights gathered from Module Four's Research Gap Worksheet highlighted the importance of focusing on familiar settings for subjects. This choice mitigates extraneous anxiety that may plague the subjects, which could otherwise skew the data collection process.

Adding New Elements

Based on insights from previous discussions, specific new elements will be incorporated into the research design. The design will utilize standardized questionnaires tailored to assess the severity of social events and contextualize them based on antagonistic or non-antagonistic circumstances. The incorporation of a clinical staff-administered process will provide a reliable mean to gather data as well as a familiar atmosphere for the participants (Becker & Kahn, 2019).

Implementation of the Research Design

The implementation phase will involve recruiting participants diagnosed with SAD from an outpatient clinic. Informed consent will be obtained from each individual to assure ethical conduct and participation rights. Individuals will be briefed about the study while ensuring that details do not influence their response patterns to the questionnaires. Participants can choose to exit the study at any point, promoting autonomy and comfort during the research process (American Psychological Association, 2020).

Ethical Considerations

Ethics play a crucial role in research, particularly involving vulnerable populations such as those with mental health disorders. The foremost ethical consideration will involve obtaining informed consent through the provision of comprehensive information regarding the study’s nature while avoiding bias in response. Additionally, steps will be taken to minimize any emotional distress by maintaining a supportive environment during the research (Fisher, 2020). Ethical review processes will be respected, ensuring that researchers adhere strictly to established guidelines and protocols.

Critiquing Peer Proposals

In the discussion, it is vital to assess the strengths and weaknesses of peer proposals thoughtfully. For instance, Tammie's correlational design capitalizes on a clinical setting that addresses real-life implications of SAD. However, the generalizability of the results may be limited due to the sample being confined to a controlled environment. Erin's experimental study takes an innovative approach to examine cognitive bias among social workers, yet challenges may arise from random assignment and the potential influence of unmeasured variables that can confound the results (Campbell & Stanley, 2016). Thus, both proposals should be critiqued based on these significant dimensions of validity and applicability.

Conclusion

The process of designing a research study is intricate, necessitating consideration of the methodology, the newly incorporated elements from previous research iterations, implementation strategies, and ethical practices. By grounding the proposed research in robust design principles and critically engaging with peer contributions, the resulting study can significantly advance the discourse on Social Anxiety Disorder and its contextual impacts.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. APA.
• Becker, L., & Kahn, S. (2019). Research Methods in Psychology: Integrating Methods and Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2016). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Fisher, C. B. (2020). Ethical Issues in Research with Children and Adolescents: Theoretical Frameworks and Practical Guidelines. Psychology Press.
• Hernández, D., & McRae, C. (2018). Understanding the Correlational Research Design. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 112-125.
• Smith, J. K., & Heshmati, A. (2021). Methodological Approaches to Mental Health Research. International Journal of Mental Health Research, 34(2), 233-249.
• Tam, M. (2019). Issues of Ethics in Psychological Research: A Comprehensive Review. Ethics and Behavior, 29(3), 213-229.
• Woods, S. M., & Woods, C. A. (2022). The significance of Ethical Protocols in Clinical Research. Clinical Research in Psychology, 12(4), 377-401.
• Young, M. (2017). Exploring the Impact of Anxiety on Social Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 30(5), 554-569.