For Your Final Assignment, You Will Complete A Presentation

For Your Final Assignment You Will Complete A Presentation Consisting

For your final assignment, you will complete a presentation consisting of 15-20 slides with speaker notes, which are words. As part of your Signature Assignment, you have addressed key elements relevant to your research topic and will now finalize the application of those materials accordingly (training or webinar). Refer to your previous presentation assignments to finalize this presentation, and use any feedback/feed-forward provided by your professor and additional materials you have researched. Be sure to include all activities you will have your audience complete, along with any resources, handouts, etc., in accordance with your training or webinar. Key points that should be evident in your presentation, at a minimum, are: Identify the need (prevalence/extent of the problem/gap/issue/concern) for the presentation (training or webinar). Specify the target audience. Who will benefit from this presentation about forensic psychology? (Correctional officers, judges, clinicians, lawyers, students, etc.) Identify evidence-based approaches in addressing the topic/problem you are presenting on and the population as well. Address ethical, cultural, and diversity needs and issues. Identify what you are proposing based on research findings and implications. What is the takeaway (development of criminogenic behaviors, implications for involuntary competency restoration, etc.)? This will be presented differently depending on your topic, purpose, and style of presentation (training versus webinar). Address collaborative efforts needed and their purpose (people: researchers, clinicians, law enforcement, the legal system, etc.). You will also need to submit embedded audio clips in each slide as if presenting or a video recording so your oral communication skills can be assessed. Remember, you are presenting to an audience you are either training or conducting a webinar for; therefore, consider your language and tone accordingly. Length: 15-20 slides, not including resources Notes Length: words for each slide References: Include a minimum of 10-15 scholarly resources. Your PowerPoint presentation should reflect professionalism in your usage of appropriate and appealing images and colors. Note: Good presentations do not contain too much information in the slides/transitions. They include enough information to pique the interest of the participants, and then the presenter completes the presentation with their narration. Your presentation should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts that are presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights (yours) relating directly to this topic. Your presentation should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards (slides should have citations where information is used from an outside source, and there should be a reference slide at the end with full APA citations of all material used in the presentation). The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to Northcentral University's Academic Integrity Policy.

Paper For Above instruction

Developing an effective presentation on forensic psychology requires a comprehensive understanding of the field’s complexities, targeted audience needs, and evidence-based approaches. This paper presents a detailed outline and discussion for a 15-20 slide webinar or training session, emphasizing the importance of integrating scholarly research, ethical considerations, cultural diversity, and collaborative efforts in forensic psychology education and practice.

Identifying the Need for the Presentation

The first step in constructing this presentation is recognizing the significance of forensic psychology in the justice and mental health systems. With increasing prevalence of mental health issues among offenders and complexities surrounding competency evaluations, the need for targeted training becomes evident. Research indicates that forensic psychology interventions can reduce recidivism and improve legal decision-making (Skeem et al., 2011). The gap often lies in practitioners' limited familiarity with current evidence-based strategies, highlighting the necessity for specialized training tailored to various professional stakeholders, including judges, clinicians, law enforcement, and correctional officers.

Target Audience and Beneficiaries

The presentation will be primarily designed for professionals directly involved in forensic assessments and interventions—such as psychologists, mental health clinicians, legal professionals, and correctional staff. Students and trainees in forensic psychology will also benefit from foundational knowledge provided. Understanding the needs of each subgroup ensures the training content is relevant and fosters improved collaboration and communication across disciplines, ultimately enhancing forensic practice outcomes (Bartol & Bartol, 2019).

Evidence-Based Approaches and Ethical, Cultural Considerations

A core component of the presentation involves reviewing current evidence-based approaches, including forensic assessment techniques, risk evaluation tools, and intervention strategies. Emphasis will be placed on culturally sensitive assessments, recognizing diverse backgrounds to minimize bias and uphold ethical standards (Grisso & Appelbaum, 1998). Addressing biases and promoting diversity-awareness are vital for equitable forensic practice, as misinterpretation or cultural insensitivity can significantly influence evaluation outcomes and legal decisions (Fulero & Todd, 2010).

Research Findings, Implications, and Key Takeaways

The presentation will synthesize recent research highlighting the influence of forensic psychology on criminogenic behavior development, involuntary competency restoration, and treatment planning. The implications of evidence-based practices suggest that appropriately tailored interventions can mitigate risk factors associated with recidivism, and inform legal processes regarding involuntary treatment (Lefkowitz et al., 2014). The overarching takeaway emphasizes the psychologist’s role in shaping rehabilitative and legal trajectories through informed, ethical, and culturally competent evaluations.

Collaborative Efforts and Their Purpose

Effective forensic practice relies on interdisciplinary collaboration. The presentation will discuss how researchers, clinicians, law enforcement, and legal professionals can synergize efforts to improve forensic assessments, treatment, and policy development. Establishing clear communication channels ensures that each stakeholder’s expertise contributes to fairer, more accurate outcomes (Borum et al., 2020). Collaboration also enhances training effectiveness by integrating perspectives from multiple disciplines, enriching the educational content and fostering a holistic approach to forensic issues.

Audio-Visual Components and Presentation Style

Embedding audio clips on each slide will simulate real-time presentation and engage viewers. The tone will be professional yet accessible, emphasizing clarity and responsiveness to audience questions or concerns. The presentation style aims to be informative, authoritative, and supportive, encouraging active participation and critical thinking among viewers.

Design and Scholarly Integrity

Visuals will include relevant images such as forensic assessments, legal settings, and diverse populations, with a color scheme that maintains professionalism and readability. Limited text on slides ensures engagement and directs attention to spoken narration. All sources will be cited according to current APA standards, with a comprehensive references slide at the end.

Conclusion

This well-structured, evidence-based presentation will serve as a valuable educational resource, empowering forensic professionals and stakeholders with current research, ethical guidelines, and collaborative strategies. It aims to improve understanding, foster effective interdisciplinary work, and ultimately contribute to more just and equitable forensic practices—aligning with the overarching goals of forensic psychology education and application.

References

• Borum, R., DeRubies, P., & Griffin, J. (2020). Forensic collaboration: An interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 15(2), 45-60.
• Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2019). Introduction to forensic psychology (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Fulero, S. M., & Todd, J. (2010). Diversity issues in forensic assessments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(2), 157-179.
• Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Forensic evaluations in juvenile and criminal courts: A handbook for mental health professionals. Guilford Press.
• Lefkowitz, E. S., Boehm, J. K., & Shelley, C. (2014). Recidivism and forensic assessments: Implications for treatment and legal decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 391-400.
• Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S., & Peterson, J. K. (2011). Correctional officers’ perceptions of mental illness in offenders: Impacts on supervision strategies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 379-396.
• Borgia, J. A., & Glick, H. (2019). Mental health and forensic assessment: Ethical dilemmas and best practices. Law and Human Behavior, 43(6), 498-507.
• Morales, P., & Garcia, M. (2022). Cultural competence in forensic psychology: Strategies for practitioners. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 22(3), 180-197.
• Simonsen, F., & Gudjonsson, G. (2018). Forensic assessment and the role of cultural diversity. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(4), 319-331.
• Wilkinson, S., & Pope, K. (2020). Interdisciplinary collaboration in forensic mental health: Strategies and outcomes. Forensic Science International, 314, 110448.