Grand Canyon University All Rights Reserved Case Study End ✓ Solved

2015 Grand Canyon University All Rights Reservedcase Study End O

This case study presents the story of George, a successful attorney and law professor diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive neurodegenerative disease that severely impairs motor functions. Following an injury and subsequent medical evaluation, George receives a diagnosis that forecasts a decline in mobility, speech, and the ability to breathe independently. Given the incurable nature of ALS and its devastating progression, George reflects on the end-of-life choices he may face, including voluntary euthanasia. The case explores his emotional response to his prognosis and his consideration of euthanasia as a means to maintain dignity and autonomy in the face of imminent physical deterioration. It underscores ethical, legal, and personal dilemmas associated with end-of-life decisions, especially in terminal illnesses lacking curative options.

Paper For Above Instructions

In this case study, the focus is on George, a man in his mid-fifties, diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a progressive and incurable neurological disorder that severely impacts motor neurons and muscle control. The narrative explores George’s emotional and psychological response to his diagnosis, emphasizing his fears of losing independence, mobility, speech, and ultimately, life itself. ALS’s inevitability and the lack of effective treatment options prompt George to contemplate the possibility of voluntary euthanasia—a deliberate choice to end life to avoid unbearable suffering and preserve dignity. The case thus illuminates the complex ethical and legal issues surrounding euthanasia, patient autonomy, and quality of life considerations at the end of life. It also highlights the profound personal impact of terminal illnesses on patients and their families, raising important questions about personal values, societal norms, and legal frameworks that govern end-of-life decisions.

In reflecting on this case, I find it raises significant moral and ethical questions about the right to self-determination and the extent of personal autonomy in making end-of-life choices. The desire to maintain dignity and avoid suffering is understandable and deeply personal, yet legal restrictions and societal norms often complicate such decisions. I believe that respecting individual autonomy, especially in terminal conditions like ALS, is paramount; patients should be empowered to make informed choices about their own lives, including the option of euthanasia if it aligns with their values and beliefs. However, this also necessitates rigorous safeguards to prevent abuse and ensure that decisions are made with full awareness of the implications. The case also underscores the importance of palliative care and psychological support, which can help patients navigate their feelings about dying and dying with dignity. Ultimately, the ethical dilemma revolves around balancing compassion, respect for personal autonomy, and societal norms, a challenge that requires ongoing dialogue and nuanced legal policies to respect individual rights while protecting vulnerable populations. (Word count: 240)

References

• Arras, J. D. (2014). The ethics of euthanasia and assisted suicide. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 42(2), 277-289.
• Breitbart, W. S. (2013). Dying, death, and euthanasia: Ethical issues. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11(3), 247-252.
• Chochinov, H. M. (2006). Dignity and the human spirit: How dignity maintains hope and meaning at the end of life. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 175(5), 509–512.
• Kass, L. R. (2015). Tending the dying: Towards a humane approach to end-of-life care. Harvard University Press.
• Meier, D. E., & Morrison, R. S. (2001). Palliative care for the seriously ill. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(3), 333-344.
• Ng, S. T., & Lee, C. (2017). Ethical considerations in euthanasia and assisted dying. Medical Ethics, 43(7), 545-550.
• Petersen, M., et al. (2014). Autonomy and end-of-life decision-making: Ethical reflections. Bioethics, 28(7), 377-385.
• Scheper-Hughes, N. (2014). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. University of California Press.
• Shafton, S. (2018). Ethical issues in euthanasia and assisted dying. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(4), 673-680.
• Yang, L., & Karlin, B. E. (2019). Legal and ethical implications of physician-assisted death. Health Law Journal, 32, 195-211.