I Will Have To Add The Full Assignment In An Attachment
I Will Have To Add The Full Assignment In An Attachment Its Not Allow
Candidates add components taught in this module to the two lesson plans previously submitted in 700.4P Planning Instruction Part 2 for evaluation. This is the final evaluation of the lesson planning projects. Recall that you will use the same two lesson plans you have previously submitted in 700.4PBP. This performance-based assessment, 700.5PBP, continues with those same two plans, this time evaluating different parts of the lesson plan and the overall plan. Please allow 3 - 5 business days for scoring.
Paper For Above instruction
The assignment requires candidates to integrate components covered in the current module into two lesson plans they previously submitted in the course 700.4P, Planning Instruction Part 2. These lesson plans are now to be evaluated as part of the final assessment, which is the 700.5PBP. This final evaluation emphasizes different specific parts of each lesson plan and an overall review of the entire plan. It is important to note that the same two lesson plans initially submitted in 700.4PBP are to be reused and modified with the incorporation of the new components learned in this module.
This process involves a thorough review of the previously submitted plans, identifying areas where new instructional components such as assessments, modifications, technology integration, or instructional strategies learned in the current module can be embedded to enhance the lesson plan's effectiveness. The integration should be meaningful, aligning with the lesson objectives and promoting student engagement and learning outcomes.
Candidates should approach this task by first revisiting their original lesson plans, analyzing the feedback received (if any), and then systematically incorporating the new components to improve their instructional design. For example, if the module covered differentiated instruction, educational technology, or formative assessment techniques, these should be explicitly added to the lesson plans with appropriate explanations of their purpose and implementation.
The objective of this assignment is to demonstrate mastery in creating comprehensive, innovative, and effective lesson plans that meet diverse student needs and align with curriculum standards. This process requires critical reflection, strategic planning, and evidence-based instructional practices. Candidates should ensure that the added components are seamlessly integrated and contribute to a cohesive lesson plan.
The evaluation will consider how well these components are incorporated, their relevance to the lesson objectives, and the potential impact on student learning. The final lesson plans will be submitted through the designated platform with the expectation that they demonstrate growth, creativity, and professional instructional planning skills. Candidates should also allocate sufficient time for review, refinement, and ensuring alignment with pedagogical best practices.
In summary, this assignment is an opportunity for candidates to showcase their ability to enhance their lesson plans by applying the knowledge gained in this module. The comprehensive integration of new instructional components helps in designing lessons that are engaging, inclusive, and aligned with educational standards, providing students with meaningful learning experiences. The submission of these revised plans marks the culmination of the course's focus on reflective, student-centered instructional planning aimed at fostering higher student achievement.
References
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.
Nightingale, N., & Cromley, J. G. (2016). Using formative assessment to improve student learning. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 229-236.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Backward design. Educational Leadership, 69(2), 50-57.
Lambert, N. M., & McCombs, B. L. (1998). How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education. Jossey-Bass.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.