Identify The 14 Moral Theories You Will

Theories Identify The 1 4 Moral Theories You Wil

In a section titled "Theories" identify the 1-4 moral theories you will use to build your compass (deontological, utilitarian, common good, virtue, etc.) along with a short documented definition for each theory. ["documented" in the sense of citing and referencing your source.] In a section titled "Explanation" explain for each theory how it would help you make what you feel would be the right decision and in what situations (ex. Using deontology at work to ensure the company’s policies are kept and its reputation is upheld; Using care ethics at home as a way to be equitable with the kids, etc.). Chose one topic from the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics (under “Ethics Spotlight”) or another pressing ethical situation you or others you know are facing at the moment and using either Framework for Ethical Decision Making (Markkula or Brown), walk through the steps to make an ethical decision and justify what you decide is the moral action to take in this situation. Be sure to be clear on which of the two frameworks you are using.

Paper For Above instruction

In today's complex ethical landscape, individuals often navigate challenging moral dilemmas that require a structured approach grounded in well-established moral theories. To develop a personal ethical compass, I have selected four influential moral theories: deontology, utilitarianism, the common good, and virtue ethics. These theories offer diverse perspectives on what constitutes morally right action and serve as guiding principles when faced with difficult decisions.

The first theory, deontology, originates from Immanuel Kant's philosophy and emphasizes duty and adherence to moral rules. According to Kant (1785), deontology asserts that actions are morally right if they are performed out of duty and in accordance with universal moral laws, regardless of the consequences (Kant, 1785). This approach provides a firm framework for ensuring consistency and integrity in decision-making, especially in professional settings where adherence to policies and honesty are paramount.

Utilitarianism, championed by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is a consequentialist theory that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or pleasure and minimizing suffering (Mill, 1863). This normative perspective helps in evaluating actions based on their outcomes, encouraging decisions that produce the greatest good for the greatest number. For instance, in healthcare, utilitarian principles can guide resource allocation to promote overall well-being.

The concept of the common good, rooted in community-oriented ethics, emphasizes societal well-being and interdependence. It advocates for actions that support social harmony, justice, and the welfare of the community as a whole (MacIntyre, 1981). In social policy and civic duties, this perspective urges individuals to consider how their actions affect broader societal interests.

Virtue ethics, tracing back to Aristotle, centers on developing moral character and virtues such as honesty, courage, and compassion. According to Aristotle (350 BCE), moral actions stem from virtuous character traits, fostering moral development over adherence to rules alone (Aristotle, 350 BCE). This approach is especially useful in personal relationships and professional environments where integrity and character are fundamental.

Explanation

Each of these theories provides distinct insights into ethical decision-making. Deontology helps in situations where adherence to rules is crucial, such as ensuring legal compliance or maintaining organizational integrity. For example, in the workplace, deontological ethics would guide me to uphold company policies and ensure honesty, even if breaking a rule might lead to a more favorable outcome.

Utilitarianism is particularly valuable in scenarios where the outcomes significantly impact many individuals. For instance, in healthcare resource allocation during a crisis, choosing actions that maximize overall health benefits aligns with utilitarian principles. It encourages weighing alternative actions based on their potential to produce the greatest happiness.

The common good approach is beneficial when considering policies or actions that affect entire communities. For example, participating in community service initiatives or supporting public health measures reflects the priority of societal well-being over individual gain (MacIntyre, 1981). It emphasizes social responsibility and ethical citizenship.

Virtue ethics guides personal character development, making it relevant in situations requiring integrity and moral strength. For example, demonstrating honesty and courage when confronting ethical lapses in the workplace fosters a virtuous and trustworthy environment (Aristotle, 350 BCE). It encourages cultivating virtues over merely following rules or calculating outcomes.

Application of Ethical Framework

A pressing ethical situation I have encountered involves decisions about data privacy in a healthcare setting. Using the Framework for Ethical Decision Making by Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, I followed their six-step process: recognizing an issue, assembling facts, evaluating options, making a decision, implementing the action, and reflecting on the outcome.

Initially, the issue was clear: balancing patients’ privacy rights with the need to use data for improving healthcare services. I gathered facts about legal requirements, institutional policies, and technological capabilities. Options included strict privacy measures, data sharing with consent, or broader data use without explicit approval.

Applying the framework, I evaluated options through ethical lenses. A deontological perspective emphasized respecting patient rights and adhering to legal standards. Utilitarian considerations favored maximizing health advancements through broader data sharing, despite privacy risks. The common good highlighted societal benefits, while virtue ethics underscored honesty and responsibility in handling sensitive data.

The decision was to implement a data management protocol that prioritized informed consent, ensuring patients were aware of how their data would be used, aligning with the principles of both deontology and virtue ethics. This approach respects individual rights while promoting trust and integrity, embodying a morally responsible course of action.

In conclusion, integrating these moral theories with a structured decision-making process enables me to approach complex ethical issues systematically and ethically. By aligning my actions with these principles, I aim to promote fairness, maximize well-being, uphold societal values, and demonstrate moral character in professional and personal contexts.

References

  • Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.
  • Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn.
  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Aristotle. (350 BCE). Nicomachean Ethics.
  • Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. (n.d.). Ethics Spotlight. Retrieved from https://ethicscenter.net/
  • Brown, M. (2011). Ethical Decision Making Frameworks. Journal of Ethics.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  • Schwartz, M. S., & Howard, J. (2019). Ethical Decision-Making in Healthcare. Medical Ethics Journal.
  • Slote, M. (2010). Morality and Virtue. Oxford University Press.
  • Fieser, J. (2018). Moral Philosophy. Routledge.

Related Assignments