Identifying Companies From Cash Flow Patterns: Cases 1 And 2

Identifying Companies From Cash Flow Patterns Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Cash provided by (used for) operating activities

Understanding cash flow patterns is essential for analyzing the financial health and operational efficiency of companies. Cash flow statements provide insights into how a company's operations, investments, and financing activities affect its liquidity. By examining these patterns across different firms, investors and analysts can infer the nature of a company's business operations, growth prospects, and financial stability.

Introduction

Cash flow analysis plays a critical role in financial statement analysis, serving as a tool to evaluate the liquidity, solvency, and overall financial health of a company. Unlike income statements, which can be affected by non-cash items and accounting policies, cash flow statements offer a clearer picture of cash movements, enabling more accurate assessments of operational efficiency and sustainability.

Analysis of Cash Flow Patterns in Different Cases

Case 1

In Case 1, the company reports a positive cash flow from operating activities ($3,000), a significant negative cash flow from investing activities (-$70,000), and a robust positive cash flow from financing activities ($75,000). The net change in cash is an increase of $8,000, resulting in a year-end cash position of $10,000 from an opening balance of $2,000.

This pattern indicates a company that possibly is investing heavily in property, equipment, or other long-term assets, which explains the large outflow from investing activities. The positive financing cash flow suggests the company might be raising capital through debt or equity issuance to fund its investments or operational needs.

The modest operating cash flow indicates that the core business is generating some cash, but the significant financing inflow underscores reliance on external funding sources.

Case 2

In contrast, Case 2 shows a negative cash flow from operating activities (-$120,000), a net inflow from investing activities ($10,000), and the same large positive cash flow from financing ($75,000). The net change is a decrease of $35,000, ending with only $5,000 in cash, down from $40,000 at the start.

This pattern suggests operational difficulties, with cash outflows from operations exceeding inflows considerably, possibly signaling declining profitability or significant working capital requirements. The positive cash flow from investing activities points to asset disposals or liquidation of investments, perhaps to meet operational shortfalls. Heavy financing inflows may be necessary to sustain operations or service debt, but overall, the company's liquidity appears to be deteriorating.

Case 3

Case 3 presents a more favorable pattern: positive operating cash flow ($80,000), negative investing cash flow (-$40,000), and negative financing cash flow (-$30,000), with a net increase in cash of $10,000, and a substantial year-end cash balance of $40,000 from an initial $30,000.

This scenario indicates a company generating strong cash flows from operations, with moderate investing activities possibly focused on capital expenditures to fuel future growth. The negative financing cash flow signifies debt repayment or share buybacks, reflecting a focus on strengthening financial stability and returning value to shareholders.

Overall, this case exemplifies a financially healthy company with robust operations and prudent capital management.

Matching Cash Flow Items to Statement Categories

The indirect method of cash flow statement classification involves adjusting net income by non-cash items and changes in working capital. The following matches the items:

1. Purchase of Investments – Investing Activities
2. Proceeds from issuance of stock – Financing Activities
3. Purchase of property and equipment – Investing Activities
4. Depreciation – Operating Activities (non-cash expense)
5. Accounts payable (decrease) – Operating Activities (change in working capital)
6. Inventories (increase) – Operating Activities (change in working capital)

This classification helps in analyzing how different activities contribute to overall cash flow, providing insights into strategic investment and financing decisions, as well as operational efficiency.

Horizontal and Vertical Analyses of Lockey Fencing Corporation

Horizontal Analysis

Horizontal analysis compares financial statements across different periods to identify growth trends or declines. For Lockey Fencing Corporation, the calculations show increases from 2012 to 2013 in net sales ($75,000 to $100,000), gross profit, and net income, indicating positive growth. Expenses such as cost of goods sold and selling, general, and administrative expenses also increased but at a manageable rate, suggesting effective cost control relative to sales growth. The slight decrease in interest expense points to possible refinancing or debt management strategies.

Vertical Analysis

Vertical analysis expresses each item as a percentage of total sales, highlighting cost structures and profitability margins. In 2013, net sales represent 100%, with cost of goods sold at 58%, gross profit at 42%, and operating expenses at 9%. The consistent analysis across 2012 enables comparison of expense ratios and efficiency. The profit margin improvement from 2012 to 2013 demonstrates better operational performance and cost management, vital in strategic planning and benchmarking against industry standards (Wild, Subramanyam, & Halsey, 2014).

Conclusion

Analyzing cash flow patterns across the three illustrative cases highlights the importance of understanding operational, investing, and financing activities' contributions to a company's liquidity. Case 1 exemplifies a growth-focused firm leveraging external funding, while Case 2 signals operational challenges requiring external financing and asset liquidations. Case 3 illustrates a healthy, self-sustaining company with positive cash generation from core operations and prudent capital management. Complemented with horizontal and vertical analyses, these insights provide a comprehensive view of financial health and strategic positioning, aiding investors, managers, and stakeholders in making informed decisions.

References

• Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2014). Financial Statement Analysis (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (2003). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. Wiley.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jordan, B. D. (2018). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Penman, S. H. (2012). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ferguson, C. (2013). Financial Analysis for Managers. Harvard Business School Publishing.
• Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2012). Business Analysis & Valuation. Cengage Learning.
• Libby, T., Libby, R., & Short, D. (2014). Financial Accounting (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gibson, C. H. (2015). Financial Reporting & Analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Sharma, S., & Sinha, R. (2014). Financial Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications. PHI Learning.