Imagine That You Are A Health Program Evaluator For Your Cou

Imagine That You Are A Health Program Evaluator For Your County Health

Imagine that you are a health program evaluator for your county health department. Your department was recently awarded funding from your state to develop and implement a program to prevent tobacco use among adolescents. The funding agency requires your program to conduct formative, process, and impact evaluations. Your job is to collaborate with the program design and implementation staff to design and conduct all aspects of the program evaluation. In your initial discussion post, you will present a mini-evaluation proposal by addressing both of the following questions: Develop at least two examples of evaluation questions to address the formative, process, and impact evaluation of the program.

Describe how the evaluation questions you developed are related to the program objectives. Discuss the instruments, methods and procedures you will use to answer the evaluation questions. Be sure to specify how and why these are appropriate by linking them to the overall rationale and reasons for conducting evaluation. The original posting should be approximately 150 words in length. Discussion: Imagine that you are a health educator and programmer for your county health department.

Your department was recently awarded funding from your state to develop and implement a program to prevent tobacco use among adolescents. As part of your program needs assessment, you must determine the availability of, access to, and attitudes toward tobacco among local middle and high school students. Recent and locally applicable data are not available from existing sources. Discuss two data collection methods that you would use to gather this information. Specify the benefits and drawbacks to each method and describe whether the data you collect with each method will be quantitative or qualitative. The original posting should be approximately 150 words in length.

Paper For Above instruction

In designing a comprehensive evaluation plan for a youth tobacco prevention program, it is essential to develop clear evaluation questions aligned with each phase of the evaluation process—formative, process, and impact. For the formative evaluation, an example question is, "What are the existing attitudes and knowledge levels about tobacco among middle and high school students?" This question helps identify baseline perceptions and inform program content. A process evaluation question could be, "Are the planned interventions being implemented as intended?" which assesses fidelity, reach, and participation levels throughout program execution. For impact, a pertinent question is, "Has the program significantly reduced the initiation or prevalence of tobacco use among adolescents?" This measures the overall effectiveness of the intervention. These questions directly relate to program objectives aimed at raising awareness, reducing access, and decreasing tobacco use. Data collection instruments such as surveys (for attitudes and behaviors), focus groups (to explore perceptions deeply), and observational checklists (to monitor implementation fidelity) will be used. These methods are justified as they generate comprehensive quantitative and qualitative data, essential for informed decision-making and program adjustment.

Discussion: Data Collection Methods for Needs Assessment

To assess tobacco availability, access, and attitudes among adolescents, two effective data collection methods are surveys and focus groups. Surveys are advantageous because they can reach a large sample efficiently and provide quantifiable data on prevalence, access, and attitudes, making analysis straightforward. However, surveys may also have limitations such as potential response bias and limited depth of understanding. Conversely, focus groups facilitate in-depth exploration of students’ perceptions and attitudes towards tobacco, providing nuanced qualitative insights that surveys might miss. The drawbacks include smaller sample sizes and potential moderator bias. Quantitative data from surveys will help identify patterns and general trends, vital for understanding prevalence and access issues. Qualitative data from focus groups will uncover underlying perceptions and social influences, informing tailored intervention strategies. Both methods complement each other, providing a comprehensive needs assessment critical for designing effective tobacco prevention initiatives.

References

• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Youth Tobacco Prevention. CDC.
• Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Wray-Lake, L., et al. (2019). Youth perceptions of tobacco: A review of literature. Journal of Adolescence, 72, 55-66.
• World Health Organization. (2019). WHO Report on Youth Tobacco Attitudes. WHO Publications.
• Brener, N. D., et al. (2017). Methods for collecting adolescent health data. Journal of School Health, 87(2), 100-107.
• Riley, W. T., et al. (2020). Using mixed methods in health behavior research. Health Education & Behavior, 47(4), 593-599.
• Huang, L., et al. (2018). Evaluating program implementation fidelity. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(2), 200-215.
• Sadler, G. R., et al. (2017). The role of qualitative research in public health. Public Health Reports, 132(4), 417-425.
• Thomas, D. R. (2016). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.