In This Paper, You Will Research And Report On Network Manag

In this paper, you will research and report on network management tools

In this paper, you will research and report on network management tools associated with (1) policy compliance, (2) bandwidth management, and (3) asset management. Compare and contrast at least one tool for each of these three network management areas. Determine the best tool for each area and discuss whether a single tool can manage multiple areas, including the reasoning behind this. Support your discussion with appropriate citations, using APA 6th edition formatting. The paper must include a title page, between 3 and 5 pages of body content, a minimum of three peer-reviewed references, and adhere to proper APA guidelines.

Paper For Above instruction

Network management tools play a crucial role in ensuring the efficient and secure operation of computer networks. They assist organizations in monitoring, controlling, and maintaining various aspects of network performance and security. In this paper, we explore three specific areas: policy compliance, bandwidth management, and asset management. For each area, we compare and contrast at least one prominent tool, identify the most effective tool for each function, and evaluate whether a single tool can handle multiple functions effectively.

Policy Compliance Management Tools

Policy compliance ensures that organizational and regulatory standards are adhered to across the network infrastructure. Tools designed for policy compliance typically facilitate policy enforcement, audit, and reporting functions. One notable tool in this domain is Cisco Prime Security Manager (PRSM). Cisco PRSM provides centralized management of network policies, security configurations, and compliance audits. It enables administrators to enforce security policies uniformly across the network and generate comprehensive compliance reports (Cisco, 2021). The strength of Cisco PRSM lies in its integration with Cisco's network hardware, providing real-time compliance monitoring and rapid policy adjustments.

In contrast, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager (NCM) is another important tool that emphasizes configuration compliance. SolarWinds NCM automates network device configuration management and audits, helping ensure devices are configured according to compliance standards (SolarWinds, 2022). While Cisco PRSM offers broader policy enforcement and security orchestration, SolarWinds NCM excels at configuration compliance management, making it particularly useful for maintaining standards across diverse network devices.

The best policy compliance tool depends on organizational needs. Cisco PRSM is preferable for organizations heavily integrated with Cisco infrastructure requiring comprehensive security management. SolarWinds NCM might be more suitable for environments with diverse hardware requiring robust configuration audits. Both tools demonstrate that aligned policy enforcement and compliance are possible through specialized platforms with different strengths.

Bandwidth Management Tools

Bandwidth management is vital for optimizing network performance, prioritizing critical applications, and preventing congestion. Paessler PRTG Network Monitor is a leading tool in this area. It provides real-time bandwidth monitoring, alerting, and traffic analysis across network segments (Paessler, 2022). PRTG's user-friendly dashboard allows network administrators to visualize bandwidth usage actively, identify bottlenecks, and configure traffic priorities. Its capacity for deep packet inspection enhances its effectiveness in diagnosing bandwidth issues.

Similarly, NetFlow Analyzer by ManageEngine offers detailed traffic analytics and bandwidth monitoring functions. It leverages Cisco's NetFlow protocol to analyze flow data, enabling detailed reports on application-specific bandwidth consumption (ManageEngine, 2022). NetFlow Analyzer excels in policy-based bandwidth prioritization, helping administrators allocate bandwidth to critical applications.

Between the two, PRTG's comprehensive monitoring and ease of use provide a slight edge for general bandwidth management needs. However, NetFlow Analyzer's detailed traffic analysis makes it particularly valuable for organizations seeking granular insights into application-level bandwidth use. Both tools support proactive management but differ somewhat in their focus on usability versus analytical depth.

Asset Management Tools

Effective asset management tools enable organizations to maintain an accurate inventory of network hardware, software, and licenses. SolarWinds Network Asset Management (NAM) stands out as a comprehensive solution, offering deep visibility into network devices, software installations, and hardware configurations (SolarWinds, 2022). It automates asset discovery and provides dashboards for tracking device lifecycle status, warranty information, and compliance status.

LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager is another robust tool focused on asset lifecycle management. It emphasizes automation from procurement through retirement, integrating with inventory and licensing data to optimize asset deployment (Ivanti, 2021). Its capabilities include automated discovery, inventory management, and license compliance, making it suitable for large, complex environments.

Both tools are highly effective, but SolarWinds NAM’s real-time discovery and comprehensive reporting make it more versatile for ongoing inventory management and compliance tracking. In contrast, LANDesk offers more detailed lifecycle management, preferred in enterprises with complex asset maintenance needs. Ultimately, the choice depends on organizational size and specific asset management requirements.

Can One Tool Manage Multiple Areas?

Some network management tools can handle multiple functions, but their effectiveness varies. For example, SolarWinds offers a suite of tools covering asset management, bandwidth monitoring, and compliance, often integrated into a single platform. Such integrated solutions can optimize workflow efficiency by centralizing management tasks (SolarWinds, 2022). However, specialized tools often outperform multifunctional tools in their particular domain because they are tailored with advanced features and granular controls.

For instance, a multifunctional tool may provide basic compliance and bandwidth monitoring but lack the depth of analysis or policy enforcement capabilities of dedicated solutions. Therefore, while one tool can handle multiple areas, organizations must balance convenience with the need for specialized features—sometimes adopting hybrid approaches for optimal results.

Conclusion

Network management is a complex field requiring specialized tools tailored to specific functions such as policy compliance, bandwidth management, and asset management. From Cisco PRSM and SolarWinds NCM in policy compliance, to PRTG and NetFlow Analyzer for bandwidth management, and SolarWinds NAM and LANDesk for asset management, organizations must evaluate their needs carefully. While integrated solutions exist, specialized tools often provide superior features for each area. The decision to use a single multifunctional tool versus a suite of specialized tools depends on organizational size, complexity, and specific management priorities. Ultimately, effective network management combines the right tools with strategic planning to ensure network security, performance, and asset oversight are maintained efficiently and effectively.

References

  • Cisco. (2021). Cisco Prime Security Manager (PRSM). Cisco Systems. https://www.cisco.com
  • Ivanti. (2021). LANDesk Asset Lifecycle Manager. Ivanti. https://www.ivanti.com
  • ManageEngine. (2022). NetFlow Analyzer. ManageEngine. https://www.manageengine.com
  • Paessler. (2022). PRTG Network Monitor. Paessler AG. https://www.paessler.com
  • SolarWinds. (2022). Network Configuration Manager & Network Asset Management. SolarWinds. https://solarwinds.com

Related Assignments