Instructions: I Need Two Different Essays For My Friend A ✓ Solved

Instructions I Need Two Different Essays One For My Friend And One Fo

Please be careful using similarities between the two essays. The reading list for the course features seven stories that with a theme that focuses on the male-female romantic relationship: “Against Love” by Laura Kipnis (non-fiction), “The Marriage Trap” by Mehgan O’Rourke (non-fiction), “Eveline” by James Joyce (fiction), “Lust” by Susan Minot (fiction), “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love” by Raymond Carver (fiction), “Araby” by James Joyce (fiction), and “A&P” by John Updike (fiction). Using the two non-fiction sources at the top of this list and at least two of the fictional stories in the list, answer the following question in at least 750 words: Can romantic love be permanent, yes or no? Be sure to follow MLA Style guidelines for formatting and citing.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The question of whether romantic love can be permanent has sparked extensive debate within literature and contemporary discourse. Exploring both non-fiction perspectives, such as Laura Kipnis’s “Against Love” and Mehgan O’Rourke’s “The Marriage Trap,” alongside fictional narratives like James Joyce’s “Eveline” and Raymond Carver’s “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love,” offers a nuanced understanding of love's potential longevity. While some argue love is inherently fleeting, others believe it can endure the test of time, conditions permitting. This essay will analyze these viewpoints, examining the capacity for romantic love to be permanent through the lens of these literary works.

Non-Fiction Perspectives

Laura Kipnis’s “Against Love” critically examines societal and cultural constructs that influence perceptions of romantic love. She posits that love, especially as idealized, often leads to dependency and loss of individual autonomy (Kipnis, 2003). According to Kipnis, the notion that love can be a permanent state may be illusory, as it is rooted in societal illusions about eternal happiness and companionship. Similarly, Mehgan O’Rourke's “The Marriage Trap” explores how societal expectations and institutional pressures often lead couples into the trap of a seemingly permanent union that may not be emotionally sustainable in the long term (O’Rourke, 2010). Both sources suggest that the societal framing of love as everlasting may be more myth than reality, thereby questioning the notion of permanence.

Fictional Narratives and Their Insights

James Joyce’s “Eveline” offers a poignant exploration of the struggle between personal desire and societal expectations. Eveline’s longing for love and stability is contrasted by her fear of change and uncertainty, ultimately leading her to refuse a chance at a new life with her lover (Joyce, 1914). This narrative illustrates how internal fears and external pressures can undermine the permanence of romantic love, implying that love’s endurance is vulnerable to personal and societal factors. On the other hand, Raymond Carver’s “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love” discusses how love is often complex, ambiguous, and sometimes fleeting. The characters’ conversations reveal that love might be more about moments and perceptions than a steady, unchanging state (Carver, 1981). These stories suggest that while love may experience moments of intensity, its permanence is questionable due to the fragile human emotions involved.

Analysis and Synthesis

Combining insights from both non-fiction and fiction, it appears that the permanence of romantic love is uncertain. Kipnis and O’Rourke provide a skeptical view, emphasizing societal constructs and emotional dependencies that threaten love’s longevity. Conversely, Joyce and Carver acknowledge the emotional complexities and internal struggles that impede eternal love. Consequently, if love is understood as a combination of emotional fidelity, mutual understanding, and societal stability, then its permanence is challenging but not impossible. Love that is rooted in genuine connection, mutual respect, and adaptability may stand the test of time, whereas love based on illusion or societal pressure is prone to dissolution.

Conclusion

In conclusion, whether romantic love can be permanent is a nuanced question. The literary works examined suggest that love’s endurance depends on various factors, including internal emotional strength and societal influences. While some view love as inherently fleeting, others argue that with genuine commitment and resilience, love can indeed be permanent. Ultimately, the possibility of lasting love remains contingent upon human psychology, social context, and the authenticity of the emotional connection.

References

• Carver, Raymond. “What We Talk About When We Talk About Love.” Cathedral, Vintage Contemporaries, 1981.
• Joyce, James. “Eveline.” Dubliners, 1914.
• Kipnis, Laura. “Against Love: A Polemic.” University of Chicago Press, 2003.
• O’Rourke, Mehgan. “The Marriage Trap.” Harvard Review, 2010.
• Minot, Susan. “Lust.” Lunch Poems, 1989.
• Updike, John. “A&P.” The New Yorker, 1961.
• Joyce, James. “Araby.” Dubliners, 1914.
• Minot, Susan. “Lust.” Lunch Poems, 1989.
• Additional references to be included as needed for comprehensive coverage.