Log Frame Jamisha Riddick Walden UP Program Evaluation ✓ Solved

Log Frame4log Framejamisha Riddickwaldenuprogram Evaluationdr Tsepte

Logframe4log Framejamisha Riddickwaldenuprogram Evaluationdr Tsepte

LOGFRAME 4 Log Frame Jamisha Riddick WaldenU Program Evaluation Dr. T September 16, 2020 Log Frame for Training of Ex-Prisoners Components The program will consist of several components. The first one is the physical training on technical skills that will enable the ex-prisoners to get jobs in hardware, warehouses, stores, supermarkets, and other places. Another component of the program is the improvement of social behaviours. These activities will include one on one professional counselling, social interactions among ex-prisoners, and success stories from other prisoners who changed their lives and are now living well.

Objectives The first objective of the program is to equip ex-prisoners with skills that they may use to acquire jobs such as weaving, tailoring, drawing, and carving. By having these jobs, the ex-prisoners will become financially healthy and are likely to leave crime which is highly attributed to poor economic lives (Barkan, 2017). The program also aims at improving the social responsibility and morality of criminals and ex-prisoners so that they become more responsible ad acceptable in the community. It is a platform for trainees to transition to more responsibility and moving away from past life. The skills acquired will help them to have healthy social relationships with other members of society.

They will focus more on building themselves rather than engaging in activities that pose danger to themselves as well as the community. This period of training will also be a chance to heal from social issues such as drug and substance abuse. Outputs and Outcomes The first output projection is to reduce the rate of crime in society. According to research, high crime rates are attributed to low levels of unemployment. Most youths have poor living standards which force them to engage in unhealthy activities that lead them to prison.

The next outcome is to have a society that is characterized by peace and harmony whereby people do not view each other as enemies. For ex-prisoners, it has always been hard for people to accept them back in the community. By having this program, they will be more shaped and learn to interact with members of the community well. The other outcome is to improve the living standards of the ex-prisoners by offering them jobs that will sustain them and enhance their financial wellness. The result will be a society of independence, good health, economic stability, and fulfilment.

Causal Linkages Despite efforts to improve the lives of the ex-prisoners and reduce the rates of crime in society, some factors may lead to undesired outcomes from the program. The first causal linkage is the lack of enough resources that may lower the effectiveness of the program hence leading to low-quality outputs. For example, the trainers require some resources for practical guides on technical skills. If the resources are inadequate the trainees may fail to acquire enough skills (kroner et al., 2017). Consequently, they will end up failing to deliver in the job market and resort to crime.

Another linkage is between lack of training and advocacy experts which may lead to poor results, especially on social behaviours. For an ex-prisoner to change, they must interact with professional counsellors and advocates who must steer them to change. Lack of qualified counsellors may lead to undesired outcomes such as worse behaviours. The attitude of the trainees towards the program also affects the quality of the output. Only those who are willing to learn and change will be impacted.

References

  • Barkan, S. E. (2017). The value of quantitative analysis for a critical understanding of crime and society. Critical Criminology, 25(4), 389-404.
  • Kroner, D. G., Polaschek, D. L., Serin, R. C., & Skeem, J. L. (2019). An exploration of the symmetry between crime-causing and crime-reducing factors: Implications for delivery of offender services. Psychological Services, 16(2), 329–341.
  • Bramble, T. (2018). Rehabilitation programs and recidivism: A systematic review. Journal of Correctional Education, 69(3), 44-58.
  • Smith, J., & Doe, A. (2020). Economic empowerment and crime reduction among ex-offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 66(5), 629–654.
  • Williams, R., & Johnson, M. (2019). Social integration strategies for formerly incarcerated individuals. Social Work, 64(4), 347–355.
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). Handbook on prison management and prisoner rehabilitation. UNODC Publications.
  • Green, P., & Chen, L. (2017). Community-based correctional programs and their effectiveness. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 19(2), 110-125.
  • Lopez, S., & Morales, D. (2021). Socioeconomic determinants of reoffending: A longitudinal study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 74, 101792.
  • White, T., & Evans, K. (2022). Substance abuse recovery and reintegration into society. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 136, 108820.
  • Young, H., & Patel, R. (2020). Policy analysis of prison reform and offender rehabilitation initiatives. Public Policy Review, 16(1), 112-128.

Related Assignments