Longer Essay 1 Dialogue Assignment Students Will Write A Dia

Longer Essay 1 Dialogue Assignmentstudents Will Write A Dialogue In W

Students will write a dialogue in which two characters discuss some of the ideas from one of our class texts. Each dialogue must include: (1) a detailed summary of an argument from one of our class texts; (2) a discussion of the summarized argument wherein one of the characters misunderstands the argument, which is then clarified by the other character; (3) a discussion of the summarized argument wherein one of the characters presents an objection to the summarized argument, which the other character refutes; (4) a discussion of the summarized argument wherein one of the characters presents an objection to the summarized argument, which the other character may either refute or may decide defeats the summarized argument; (5) a discussion of the summarized argument in relation to an argument from another class text; (6) a discussion of the summarized argument in relation to a current event; (7) quotations and citations for (1)-(6) from a. the main class text, b. the second class text (for (5)), c. an outside source (for (6)). Papers will be assessed based on the presence and quality of each of the elements above as well as on style, grammar, and creativity.

Format: Each dialogue must be 12-point font, single-spaced. Only printed copies of dialogues will be accepted.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment requires students to craft a dialogue between two characters that critically engages with ideas presented in class texts. This exercise is designed to develop understanding of complex arguments, their interpretation, and their relation to broader contexts, including other texts and current events. The dialogue must include specific analytical components to demonstrate comprehensive engagement, critical thinking, and textual understanding.

To fulfill the assignment, students should start by selecting one of the class texts to focus on. The first step involves providing a detailed summary of an argument within that text. This summary should precisely identify the main claims, supporting evidence, and the overall structure of the argument, demonstrating clarity and comprehension. A good summary captures the essence of the argument without oversimplification or excessive detail.

Next, the dialogue should depict one character misunderstanding this argument. This could involve misinterpreting the thesis, misrepresenting the evidence, or drawing an incorrect conclusion about the argument's implications. The second character then offers a clarification to correct this misunderstanding, elucidating the true nature of the argument. This exchange showcases the importance of accurate interpretation in philosophical and textual analysis.

The dialogue then moves to presenting a critique or objection to the original argument. One character offers this objection, perhaps challenging the premises, the reasoning, or the conclusions. The other character responds by either refuting the objection, providing counter-evidence, or defending the original argument against this challenge. This back-and-forth highlights critical engagement with the argument’s strengths and weaknesses.

Following this, the dialogue should include another objection to the summarized argument. This objection may pose a significant challenge that seems to undermine the original argument or require reconsideration. The responding character then assesses whether this objection successfully defeats the argument or if it can be addressed and rebutted. This element reflects nuanced evaluation skills.

Moving beyond the immediate argument, the characters discuss the relevance of the debate in relation to another class text. They should identify similarities, differences, or dialogues between the two arguments, emphasizing intertextual understanding.

Lastly, the characters connect the argument to a current event or real-world issue. This demonstrates the ability to contextualize theoretical ideas within contemporary society and policy.

Throughout the dialogue, students must incorporate quotations and citations from the main class text, a secondary class text, and an outside source related to the current event. Proper attribution and integration of sources are critical to showcase research skills and academic integrity.

The dialogue must be formatted in 12-point, single-spaced font and be presented in printed form. The assignment is valued at 25% of the final grade and is due on Thursday, November 16.

References

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of the main class text. Publisher.
• Author, B. B. (Year). Title of the second class text. Publisher.
• Outside source author, C. C. (Year). Title of article or book. Journal or Publisher.
• Additional references in proper APA format.