Low Employee Motivation Creates Low Productivity

Example 1situation Low Employee Motivation Creates Low Productivity

Low employee motivation leads to decreased productivity. To identify sources of low productivity under management control, a company distributed a questionnaire, which revealed numerous complaints about the efficiency of the current data input system. The problem statement is: How can the data input system be made more efficient? The objectives are to update the system to be more user-friendly, cost-efficient relative to the improvements, and uniform across all departments.

Several alternatives are considered: (1) Replacing all components of the old system with a new system; (2) Having the system creator develop patches; (3) Increasing broadband to improve speed; (4) Conducting a scan for viruses and malware; (5) Upgrading network security to prevent hacking threats. The analysis involves a Kepner-Tregoe (K-T) problem analysis to determine the probable cause—whether human error or technical issues such as outdated systems, low broadband, viruses, or hackers—and a decision analysis weighing the alternatives against the must and want criteria.

Prioritizing security concerns, especially the risk of malware and hacking, the organization views system security upgrades as critical. The decision analysis shows upgrading network security and installing hacking countermeasures as top priorities, with other system updates supporting these objectives. Implementation choices are made based on their ability to satisfy core priorities while remaining cost-efficient and maintaining standardization across departments.

The comprehensive approach reveals that addressing security vulnerabilities not only helps prevent data breaches but also improves overall system stability and employee confidence, consequently enhancing motivation and productivity. The decision process underscores the importance of targeted problem analysis and structured decision evaluation in organizational improvements, aligning with best practices in operational management.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Low employee motivation remains a persistent challenge for organizations seeking to enhance productivity and operational efficiency. When motivation declines, workers often exhibit decreased engagement, increased absenteeism, and subpar performance, which collectively hinder organizational growth. Addressing this issue requires a nuanced understanding of underlying causes and strategic interventions that align with organizational goals. This paper explores how structured problem analysis, particularly the Kepner-Tregoe (K-T) methodology, can facilitate effective decision-making to remedy low motivation by improving system processes—specifically focusing on enhancing data input efficiency through technological upgrades.

Understanding the link between employee motivation and productivity necessitates a comprehensive approach to problem diagnosis. In the context of the presented situation, the company identified that the data input system was a bottleneck affecting workflow, leading to employee frustration and decreased motivation. To systematically analyze this problem, the K-T problem analysis was employed to distinguish the probable causes. The analysis suggested that the issue was rooted in technical inefficiencies such as outdated hardware or software, low broadband connectivity, or security vulnerabilities like viruses and hackers, rather than human error or training deficiencies.

The decision analysis component then evaluated various alternatives based on critical criteria: user-friendliness, cost-efficiency, security, and consistency across departments. Prioritizing security—particularly the threat posed by malware and hacking—emerged as the primary concern, given the potential for data breaches and operational disruptions. Consequently, security upgrades were deemed essential, alongside system updates aimed at improving speed and user interface. Options such as replacing all hardware components or patching the existing system were assessed against the need for minimal downtime and ease of implementation.

Analysis revealed that upgrading network security, including installing advanced firewall protection and anti-malware systems, offered the most immediate and impactful results. These measures would safeguard sensitive data, prevent unauthorized access, and create a stable environment conducive to motivating employees by reducing frustration and uncertainty. Simultaneously, expanding broadband capacity and patching existing systems complemented security upgrades by facilitating faster data processing and minimizing delays. The combined approach ensures a comprehensive solution that enhances operational efficiency, employee morale, and overall productivity.

The application of the K-T methodology exemplifies its utility in organizational decision-making by providing a structured framework to diagnose problems accurately and evaluate alternatives systematically. Such structured analysis minimizes subjectivity and hasty decisions, ensuring that interventions are both effective and aligned with organizational priorities. In this scenario, security upgrades not only address immediate technical vulnerabilities but also serve as a strategic investment in creating a secure, efficient work environment that motivates employees and enhances productivity. Ultimately, the integration of technological improvements, underpinned by structured problem-solving, can translate into sustained organizational performance improvements.

References

• Kepner, R. & Tregoe, B. (1981). The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. Princeton Research Press.
• Hitchcock, D., & Willard, S. (2006). Practical Problem Solving: Kepner-Tregoe. FT Press.
• Haines, S. G. (2014). Management and Organizational Behavior. Cengage Learning.
• Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
• Williams, T. (2004). The Principles of Project Management. CRC Press.
• Mintzberg, H. (2009). Understanding organizations. Pearson Education.
• Gray, C. F., & Larson, E. W. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2020). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson.
• Collins, J. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t. HarperBusiness.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Review Press.