Manufacturing Processes Product Process Matrix MTO Vs MTS

Manufacturing Processesproduct Process Matrix Mtoato Vs Mts Mass

Manufacturing Processes: Product-process Matrix, MTO/ATO vs MTS, Mass Customization John Wu, Ph.D., Professor of Supply Chain and Transportation CSU San Bernardino

Manufacturing has undergone significant transformation since the 1990s, driven by globalization, technological advancements, and shifting economic priorities. The industrial landscape has seen the decline of certain manufacturing industries in developed countries like the U.S., where deindustrialization has led to the outsourcing of environmentally harmful and labor-intensive production to less developed nations. Simultaneously, there has been a rise in service industries, which now constitute a larger share of economic activity. This transition reflects changing consumer preferences, technological progress, and strategic corporate decisions aimed at optimizing costs and responsiveness.

Historically, industries such as textiles, steel, and traditional manufacturing sectors have diminished in the U.S. and other developed nations. These sectors often involved high pollution, manual labor, and low-value output, prompting companies to offshore these activities to countries with lower labor costs. Correspondingly, economies like the U.S. have shifted focus towards services such as healthcare, financial services, education, and high-tech industries including information technology and software development. These sectors emphasize innovation, customer experience, and knowledge-based outputs, contrasting sharply with the earlier focus on heavy manufacturing.

Understanding the Manufacturing Industry and Service Evolution

The decline in manufacturing shares, despite rising global outputs, exemplifies the changing economic structure. The U.S. manufacturing sector, particularly in regions like the Midwest "Manufacturing Belt," has seen employment decline, yet production remains robust due to automation and improved efficiency. Countries such as Mexico have benefited from "maquiladoras," which localize manufacturing near borders for streamlined export to the U.S., especially in electronics, automotive parts, and textiles.

California's role in manufacturing is diverse—ranging from high-tech aerospace and electronics to biotech and consumer products—yet it faces similar challenges of offshore competition and automation. The state's manufacturing industry is characterized by innovation-driven firms that focus on advanced materials, semiconductor fabrication, and sustainable technologies, aligning with the broader shift towards high-value and knowledge-based outputs.

Emergence of Automation and Flexible Manufacturing Systems

The proliferation of industrial robots and automation has revolutionized production processes, enabling mass customization and just-in-time manufacturing. Robotics enhances precision, reduces labor costs, and increases safety, particularly in automotive assembly and electronics manufacturing. The integration of flexible manufacturing systems allows companies to swiftly adapt to changing market demands, supporting strategies like mass customization—delivering personalized products at scale.

This transformation impacts process design, capacity planning, and supply chain management, requiring firms to develop advanced process mapping and operational strategies to optimize throughput and resource utilization.

Product Creation Cycle and Manufacturing Process Selection

The manufacturing process is typically conceived through a product creation cycle: design, material selection, process selection, manufacturing, inspection, and feedback. This cycle underscores how process choices impact product quality, cost, and delivery times.

There are fundamental process categories aligned with different product types:

• Make-to-Order (MTO): Customized products designed to meet specific customer requirements (e.g., ships, custom jewelry). MTO offers high flexibility, but usually involves higher costs and longer lead times.
• Assemble-to-Order (ATO): Configurations of standard components assembled based on customer options (e.g., Dell computers). ATO balances customization with efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
• Make-to-Stock (MTS): Standardized products produced in anticipation of demand (e.g., appliances, shoes). MTS enables mass production but offers limited customization.

Process Choice Decisions and Manufacturing Types

Choosing the appropriate manufacturing process involves understanding the product characteristics, demand variability, and cost implications. Job shops focus on flexible, small-batch production tailored to individual orders, ideal for custom products like surgical instruments or jewelry. Assembly lines enable large-scale, standardized production of similar items, such as cars or household appliances. Continuous flow processes are used for highly standardized, high-volume products like chemicals or steel, operating 24/7 with minimal variation.

Batch processing, combining elements of flexibility and volume efficiency, suits products with moderate demand and variety. Comparative analysis of these processes highlights trade-offs between customization, efficiency, and capital investment.

Service and Product Process Matrices

The product-process matrix aligns process choice with product characteristics, ensuring optimal resource utilization and customer satisfaction. The service-positioning matrix further maps service delivery pathways—customer-routed versus provider-routed—based on customer involvement and customization needs. These tools assist firms in designing responsive and efficient operations within complex markets.

For example, customer-routed services like personalized consulting offer extensive flexibility, while provider-routed services like airline check-in involve standard pathways. Proper alignment along the matrices enhances service quality and operational efficiency.

Process Design and Improvement Strategies

The goal of process design is to create an operational system that balances cost, quality, flexibility, and delivery speed. Process mapping tools, such as flowcharts and value stream maps, visualize current operations, identify bottlenecks, and uncover non-value-added activities.

Strategies for improvement include process reengineering, which involves radical redesign to achieve breakthrough performance gains. Continuous improvement methodologies like Six Sigma and Lean focus on incremental enhancements, waste reduction, and capacity utilization. Reengineering often targets reducing cycle times, minimizing waste, and addressing inefficient bottlenecks, leading to significant operational efficiencies.

Key Concepts in Process Optimization

Process analysis involves measuring performance through metrics like utilization, throughput, and flow time, with tools such as Little’s Law providing critical insights into capacity planning. Identifying bottlenecks—the limiting step in a process—is essential for boosting throughput and reducing lead times. Increasing capacity at bottlenecks, automating tasks, and eliminating non-value-added activities can significantly improve process performance.

Utilization, calculated as the ratio of used to available resources, indicates how effectively a process utilizes its capacity. Throughput measures how many units a process completes per unit time, while flow time reflects the cycle time from start to finish.

Product and Process Lifecycle Implications

The product lifecycle—comprising introduction, growth, maturity, and decline—significantly influences process choices. During introduction, flexible processes like job shops are favored. As maturity is reached, automation and line processes dominate. Decline often involves process downsizing or reengineering to maintain competitiveness or phase out obsolete products.

The product-process matrix helps organizations align process types with lifecycle stages, ensuring efficient resource use and market responsiveness.

Conclusion

The evolution of manufacturing processes, driven by technological, economic, and strategic factors, underscores the importance of selecting suitable process types aligned with product characteristics and customer needs. The integration of flexible manufacturing, automation, and strategic process improvement remains crucial for firms seeking competitive advantage in rapidly changing markets. Understanding tools like the product-process matrix and process mapping enhances operational design, fostering innovation, efficiency, and customer satisfaction in modern manufacturing environments.

References

1. Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Operations Management (13th ed.). Pearson.
2. Schmenner, R. W. (1986). Service-system design for growth and competitiveness. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(4), 3-19.
3. Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Burgess, N. (2022). Operations Management (10th ed.). Pearson.
4. Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
5. Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1979). Link manufacturing process design to competitive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(1), 115-125.
6. Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2004). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (3rd ed.). North River Press.
7. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press.
8. Johnson, H. T., & Kagermann, H. (2009). The limits of the design approach to operations strategy. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 83-93.
9. Stevenson, W. J. (2021). Operations Management (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
10. Vonderembse, M., & Tracey, M. (2018). Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management. Pearson.