McGee Carpet And Trim Installs Carpets In Commercial Offices

Mcgee Carpet And Trim Installs Carpets In Commercial Offices Andrea M

Determine the expected times, variances, critical path, project duration, slack, and probability of completing the carpet installation project within 40 days using PERT analysis, applying project management principles.

Paper For Above instruction

Project management is a systematic approach to planning, executing, and controlling projects to achieve specific objectives within designated constraints such as time, cost, and resources. Effective project management ensures that project goals align with organizational strategic objectives, facilitates resource allocation, manages risks, and enhances communication among stakeholders (PMI, 2017). Essential requirements for successful project management include clear goal definition, comprehensive planning, stakeholder engagement, resource management, and robust monitoring and control mechanisms. Using project management techniques like Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) enables organizations to optimize project timelines, allocate resources efficiently, and mitigate risks related to schedule delays.

In the context of McGee Carpet and Trim’s carpet installation project, applying PERT and other project management tools provides critical insights into the project’s schedule, risks, and probability of meeting deadlines. The project involves several activities, each with estimated optimistic, most likely, and pessimistic duration times. Calculating the expected duration and variance of each activity enables project managers to determine the overall project timeline, identify critical activities, and evaluate schedule risks.

PERT Analysis: Expected Times and Variances

The PERT formula calculates the expected activity duration (TE) using the weighted average: TE = (OT + 4 * MT + PT) / 6. The variance (σ^2) of each activity is calculated as ((PT - OT) / 6)^2 (Kerzner, 2013). Applying these formulas:

  • Activity 1: Measure office room dimensions
  • TE = (1 + 4 * 2 + 3) / 6 = 2 days; Variance = ((3 - 1)/6)^2 ≈ 0.0556
  • Activity 2: Estimate cost
  • TE = (2 + 4 * 3 + 4) / 6 ≈ 3 days; Variance ≈ 0.1111
  • Activity 3: Material requisition
  • TE = (2 + 4 * 2 + 3) / 6 ≈ 2.17 days; Variance ≈ 0.0556
  • Activity 4: Workforce requisition
  • TE = (2 + 4 * 3 + 4) / 6 ≈ 3 days; Variance ≈ 0.1111
  • Activity 5: Special tool requisition
  • TE = (1 + 4 * 2 + 3) / 6 ≈ 2 days; Variance ≈ 0.0556
  • Activity 6: Installation
  • TE = (5 + 4 * 7 + 9) / 6 ≈ 7 days; Variance ≈ 1.1111
  • Activity 7: Inspection and customer acceptance
  • TE = (1 + 4 * 2 + 3) / 6 ≈ 2 days; Variance ≈ 0.0556

Determining the Critical Path and Total Project Duration

Based on activity dependencies, the critical path is identified by mapping task sequences and calculating their total expected durations. Activity 1 starts immediately, followed by Activity 2. Activities 3, 4, and 5 commence concurrently after Activity 2. Activities 3, 4, and 5 must all complete before Activity 6 can start, which then precedes Activity 7. The sum of durations along the critical path (assuming the longest durations) equals:

  • Activity 1: 2 days
  • Activity 2: 3 days
  • Activities 3, 4, 5: Max (2.17, 3, 2) = 3 days (since they run concurrently)
  • Activity 6: 7 days
  • Activity 7: 2 days

Thus, total expected project duration = 2 + 3 + 7 + 2 = 14 days, with the bottleneck being Activity 6.

Calculating Early Start, Early Finish, Late Start, Slack

Using forward and backward pass techniques aligned with critical path, we set the earliest start (ES) and earliest finish (EF) times. For the critical path:

  • Activity 1: ES=0, EF=2
  • Activity 2: ES=2, EF=5
  • Activities 3,4,5: ES=5, EF=8
  • Activity 6: ES=8, EF=15
  • Activity 7: ES=15, EF=17

Backward pass yields latest start (LS) and latest finish (LF) times. Assuming total project duration is 17 days (adding buffer), and calculating slack (LF - EF or LS - ES), we find that activities on the critical path have zero slack, confirming their criticality. Activities not on the critical path have positive slack, giving flexibility in scheduling (Kerzner, 2013).

Probability of Completing within 40 Days

Since the total expected duration is significantly less than 40 days, the probability of completing the project within this timeframe is virtually 100%. However, calculating this precisely involves determining the project's variance and applying the normal distribution. The total project variance is the sum of variances along the critical path: approximately 1.1111 + 0.1111 + 0.0556 ≈ 1.2778. The standard deviation (σ) is sqrt(1.2778) ≈ 1.13. The Z-score for 40 days is (40 - 17) / 1.13 ≈ 20.35, indicating an extremely high probability (>99.999%) that the project finishes within this period.

Implications of Changes in Project Scheduling

Changes in project scheduling, such as delays or accelerations, can significantly impact project success. Schedule delays, especially on critical path activities, can extend the overall project duration and increase costs, while compression without appropriate adjustments may lead to quality issues or resource overload (Leach, 2014). Flexibility in scheduling enables managers to mitigate risks, allocate buffers, and adaptively manage resources. Conversely, rigid schedules exacerbate the impact of unforeseen problems, leading to missed deadlines and dissatisfied stakeholders. Therefore, continuous monitoring and dynamic adjustment aligned with project management principles are vital for achieving project objectives efficiently (PMI, 2017).

Application of Project Management Techniques to Organizational Goals

Applying structured project management techniques, including PERT, CPM, and earned value management (EVM), directly supports organizational operational goals by optimizing resource utilization, minimizing delays, and ensuring timely project delivery. For McGee Carpet and Trim, these techniques enhance strategic planning, improve reliability of completion times, and foster client satisfaction by providing transparency and accountability. Effective project management also contributes to operational efficiency, reducing waste and overhead costs while maintaining quality standards (Meredith & Mantel, 2017). These practices align with the firm’s goals of reducing project completion times, improving reliability, and delivering high-quality services, positioning the company for competitive advantage and sustained growth.

Conclusion

In conclusion, applying project management principles, particularly PERT analysis, enables McGee Carpet and Trim to accurately estimate project timelines, identify critical activities, and assess schedule risks. Understanding the implications of scheduling changes and employing proactive management strategies ensures the firm can meet deadlines and improve operational efficiency. Integrating these techniques with organizational goals supports strategic growth, enhances client satisfaction, and increases competitiveness in the commercial carpeting industry. Ultimately, disciplined project management fosters a culture of accountability, precision, and continuous improvement, key for sustained success.

References

  • Kerzner, H. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical chain project management: Developing robust project plans. Project Management Institute.
  • Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project management: A managerial approach. Wiley.
  • PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
  • Verma, V. K. (2018). Project management: A comprehensive guide. Pearson Education.
  • Hillson, D. (2017). Risk management and project management. Routledge.
  • Burke, R. (2013). Project management: Planning and control techniques. Wiley.
  • Gido, J., & Clements, J. P. (2017). Successful project management. Cengage Learning.
  • Lock, D. (2013). Project management. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
  • Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.

Related Assignments