Mgmt 3700 Course Assignment Rubric Criteria Score 0
Mgmt 3700course Assignment Rubriccriterionscore 0 If Element Is Absen
Mgmt 3700course Assignment Rubriccriterionscore 0 If Element Is Absen Mgmt 3700course Assignment Rubric Criterion (Score 0 if element is absent) Below Expectations (1) Meets Expectations (2) Exceeds Expectations (3) Score Explanation of issues Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions. Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. Evidence Selecting and using information to investigate a point of view or conclusion Assertions based on personal opinion only. Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Assertions are supported with appropriate evidence. Evidence provided in support of an argument is described and interpreted correctly. Assertions supported with evidence. Information is taken from source(s) with enough interpretation/evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Student's position Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is stated, but is very simplistic and does not show critical thinking. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) takes into complexity of the issues. Specific position (perspective, thesis/hypothesis) is imaginative taking into account the complexity of the issues. Writing Sentences sound awkward, are distractingly repetitive, or are difficult to understand. The author makes numerous errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling that interfere with understanding. Most sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes a few errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling, but they do not interfere with understanding. All sentences are well constructed and have varied structure and length. The author makes no errors in grammar, mechanics, and/or spelling. TOTAL This is worth 25 points. Please view the following clip: then read the following article: Note: GM Powertrain is a unionized facility who votes for their union officers of which some of the union officers get paid $50,000 to $100,000 Now answer the following questions: 1. Define the problem that GM Powertrain and Philly is experiencing as it relates to diversity and inclusion. 2. If the employees with power (the ability to influence due to either large numbers or protection by the union) are doing the harassing and they vote for union members—who will the union protect and why? Will they protect the harassed employees or those doing the harassing, why? 3. What does this scenario have to do with the following statements: Having a “certain’ identity that society values can provide you power. Belonging to a group with power can provide you protection in the workplace. 4. Now read the following: Based upon this reading, state three things that GM Powertrain and Philly should have done and three things they should not do as the scenario plays out. 5. Do you think that diversity training of the employees would help with these scenarios, why or why not?