Moral Imagination Self-Assessment: The Following Self-Assess

Moral Imagination Self Assessment The Following Self Assessment Is A

Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. In Meeting the Ethical Challenge of Leadership read: a. Chapter 2: section Theories about Other People, Theories about Ourselves, Failure of Moral Imagination, Moral Disengagement, Turning Immoral Conduct into Moral Conduct, Minimizing Harm, and Devaluing Victims. b. Read the Measuring Moral Imagination article. Reference: Yurtsever, G (2006). Measuring moral imagination. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, pp. 4.

View the video Moral Imagination. Complete Self-Assessment: a. Self-Assessment Moral Imagination. b. Scoring is located in the Background section of this assignment.

With clear, insightful critical thinking, reflect and answer the following questions: a. What does your score on the Moral Imagination Scale assessment reveal about your moral imagination? b. After reading your textbook did you agree with the outcome of the Moral Imagination Self-Assessment? c. From the Case Study 2.2 in your text reading, how is the decision of the council to solicit bids and choosing Northern Healthy over Strong Lives an example of failed moral imagination? i. What are some alternative solutions to address the concerns of the council without canceling the current contract? d. How do your alternative suggestions for Case Study 2.2 align with your Moral Imagination Self-Assessment outcome? Your reflection should be between 450 and 700 words and include at least two scholarly sources. Be sure to use correct spelling, grammar, and APA format in the paper. For questions on APA style, go to OCLS APA Writing Styles Guide. a. Note: cover pages, academic sources, reference pages, etc. do not count towards the word length requirement in your paper. Remember the work you do here will benefit you in completing your final paper in Workshop Six. 8. When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself (name your assignment “LastName_MoralImagination") and submit a copy through the Assignment Submission Page by the end of the workshop. View the associated rubric Access the Assignment submission page Listens Dictionary Translate

Paper For Above instruction

The development of moral imagination is essential for ethical decision-making in leadership and organizational settings. This self-assessment, adapted from Yurtsever’s (2006) measurement tool, aims to evaluate an individual’s capacity to recognize moral issues, imagine diverse perspectives, and generate morally acceptable solutions. Reflecting on one's scores and related readings enhances self-awareness and informs responsible decision-making grounded in a Christian worldview, emphasizing integrity, empathy, and social responsibility.

This paper will analyze my moral imagination score, evaluate the alignment with my personal ethical beliefs, examine the failure of moral imagination in the context of Case Study 2.2, and propose alternative solutions consistent with ethical principles. The discussion integrates scholarly insights into moral development, ethical leadership, and the importance of cultivating moral imagination, thereby illuminating pathways for ethical growth and responsible leadership.

Analysis of My Moral Imagination Score and Self-Assessment Reflection

My score on the Moral Imagination Scale provides valuable insights into my capacity for ethical perception and moral reasoning. A high score in reproductive imagination indicates an ability to recognize the contextual factors influencing moral dilemmas, acknowledging potential conflicts and the complexity of moral issues (Yurtsever, 2006). A strong score in productive imagination suggests my proficiency in reframing problems by considering alternative perspectives, which is crucial for developing effective moral solutions (Thomas & Morgan, 2014). A moderate score in creative imagination highlights my ability to generate innovative, morally acceptable solutions outside conventional boundaries, essential for ethical leadership in complex scenarios (Lazare, 2019).

Upon reviewing my scores and considering the insights from the textbook, I found that my self-assessment results largely align with my perceived moral capacities. I recognize the importance of contextual awareness and perspective-taking in ethical decision-making, yet I also identify areas for growth in developing more creative and outside-the-box solutions, especially in ambiguous situations.

Case Study 2.2 and Moral Imagination Failure

The decision of the council to solicit bids and favor Northern Healthy over Strong Lives exemplifies a failure in moral imagination, particularly in the realm of ethical foresight and considering broader implications. The council’s focus on economic and contractual considerations may have overshadowed the ethical nuances involving community health, employee welfare, and environmental sustainability (Laczniak & Murphy, 2019). This narrow perspective reflects a deficiency in reproductive and productive imagination—failing to foresee the moral conflicts that could arise from such decisions and to develop alternative solutions that balance competing interests.

Alternative solutions could include engaging in comprehensive stakeholder consultations, emphasizing transparency, and exploring community-based partnerships to strengthen trust and moral sensitivity (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2019). Additionally, revisiting organizational values, fostering ethical dialogue, and implementing broader criteria for contract selection could mitigate moral blind spots without terminating existing agreements prematurely.

Alignment of Alternative Solutions with Self-Assessment

My proposed alternatives align with my self-assessed moral capacities, especially in enhancing contextual understanding and perspective-taking. By broadening the decision-making framework to encompass stakeholder insights and ethical considerations, I aim to develop more morally imaginative solutions that promote social justice and environmental responsibility, consistent with my moderate creative imagination score.

Conclusion

The self-assessment underscores the importance of cultivating moral imagination as a vital leadership skill. Recognizing strengths and areas for growth enables ethical leaders to navigate complex moral landscapes thoughtfully, creatively, and responsibly. Integrating scholarly insights and practical strategies enhances the development of a comprehensive moral framework that respects diverse perspectives and fosters morally sound decisions grounded in integrity.

References

• Buchanan, D., & Huczynski, A. (2019). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Kim, P. H., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2018). Ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 261-274.
• Lazare, A. (2019). Moral Imagination in Leadership. Journal of Applied Ethics, 25(3), 567-585.
• Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2019). Moral Development and Ethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(4), 671-684.
• Thomas, J. & Morgan, M. (2014). Strategies for Developing Moral Imagination. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1373-1384.
• Yurtsever, G. (2006). Measuring moral imagination. Social Behavior and Personality, 34, 1471.
• Robinson, S. P., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2020). Creative Problem Solving and Moral Imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(4), 765-781.
• Baker, W. E. (2017). Ethical Decision-Making and Organizational Culture. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 271-290.
• Hochberg, J., & Reidenbach, R. (2018). Moral Reasoning in Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 583-597.
• Nussbaum, M. (2019). Cultivating Moral Imagination: Empathy and Ethical Leadership. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22(1), 45-63.