New Class Module 21: Describe The Primary Focus Of The 4 Maj ✓ Solved

New Classmodule 21describe The Primary Focus Of The 4 Major Component

Describe the primary focus of the four major components of Chapter 2, which include Background to the Problem, Theoretical Foundation, Review of the Literature Topics, and Summary. Explain how each of these sections helps to define your research, based on the criteria listed for each section.

After reviewing Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 in the Dissertation Proposal Template, explain how you will use information from sections in Chapter 2—specifically Background to the Problem, Theoretical Foundations, and topics in the Review of the Literature—to develop a first draft of Chapter 3. This draft should include the Problem Statement, Research Questions, Research Design, Data Collection sources, and Data Analysis.

Additionally, describe how you will self-score each section using the provided criteria to improve the quality of your work and to accelerate the process of writing your proposal.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The process of developing a comprehensive dissertation proposal necessitates a clear understanding of each component within Chapter 2, which serves as the foundation for the entire research. The four major components—Background to the Problem, Theoretical Foundation, Review of the Literature Topics, and Summary—each have specific roles that collectively shape the direction and depth of the study.

Background to the Problem

This section provides contextual information about the research problem, highlighting its significance, scope, and the necessity of addressing it. It establishes the foundation for understanding why the issue is urgent and warrants investigation. By presenting relevant background information, this component situates the research within its broader societal, organizational, or academic context. It helps to delineate the boundaries of the problem and underscores its importance, serving as a precursor to the formulation of research questions.

Theoretical Foundation

The theoretical foundation comprises relevant theories, models, or frameworks that underpin the research. It offers a lens through which the problem is viewed, guiding the development of hypotheses or propositions. This component is essential for providing scholarly grounding and establishing the validity of the research approach. By anchoring the study within established theories, it ensures that the research contributes to and extends existing knowledge, while also informing the design and interpretation of data.

Review of the Literature Topics

This section critically examines existing research related to the problem, highlighting gaps, controversies, and areas needing further exploration. It provides a synthesis of current knowledge, demonstrating the researcher’s understanding of the field. This review helps in refining the research questions, ensuring they are relevant and contribute to filling identified gaps. It also guides the selection of variables and methodologies by analyzing previous studies' strengths and limitations.

Summary

The summary consolidates key points from the previous sections, emphasizing the research problem, its theoretical basis, and the state of existing literature. It clarifies how the components interconnect and set the stage for subsequent chapters. The summary also illustrates the researcher’s understanding and readiness to proceed, creating a logical transition toward the development of Chapter 3.

Using Chapter 2 Information to Develop Chapter 3

Based on the insights gained from Chapter 2, I will craft the first draft of Chapter 3 by translating background information and theoretical considerations into specific research elements. The Background to the Problem will inform the Problem Statement and justify the research questions. The Theoretical Foundation will guide the selection of variables and hypotheses, shaping the Research Design and Data Collection methods. The topics identified in the Review of the Literature will assist in selecting appropriate Data Sources and refining Data Analysis techniques to ensure alignment with existing research while addressing gaps.

Self-scoring and Improvement Strategies

To ensure high-quality work, I will utilize the provided criteria to self-score each section of Chapter 2. For example, I will evaluate whether the Background to the Problem clearly articulates the significance and scope of the issue. I will assess if the Theoretical Foundation convincingly supports the study and is relevant. I will review the Literature Topics to determine if they are comprehensive and critical. The Summary will be checked for coherence and clarity. Based on these evaluations, I will identify areas that require strengthening, such as elaborating on theoretical connections or expanding literature coverage.

This reflective scoring process will help me identify strengths and weaknesses, allowing me to refine my writing iteratively. Incorporating feedback and aligning each component with the set criteria will streamline the subsequent development of Chapter 3, accelerating the proposal process and enhancing quality at each stage.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: Do the Best Student Literature Reviews Lead to Good Research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16-25.
• Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction. Pearson.
• Kumar, R. (2014). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications.
• Locke, L. F., Silverman, S. J., & Spirduso, W. W. (2013). Reading and Understanding Research. Sage Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage Publications.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2011). Research at Grass Roots: For the Social Sciences and Human Service Professions. Van Schaik Publishers.