Nightingale Case A B 35 Points Individual Assessment

Instructionsw4 Nightingale Case A B 35 Points Individual Assignm

Instructions W4 Nightingale Case A & B – 35 points - Individual Assignment As indicated in the syllabus, it is important to demonstrate knowledge of MS Project. Week 4 includes using the software and interpreting the results as follows: 1. Read the Nightingale Project - LG textbook pg . Review MS Project Video Tutorials (Lessons/Course Materials/Support Videos) and complete the Case for both Part A and Case Part B. 3. Submit two separate MS Project .mpp files (one for part A and one for part B). Remember to submit the appropriate “view” reflecting all applicable columns and content information. 4. Submit MS Word file to specifically answer all questions for both parts (part A questions 1-3 & part B questions 1-4). 5. Ensure you document the version of MS Project you are using in the submission comments field. Hints: You should read ALL instructions in the case and case technical details before you start the Project file. You may want to set up the Project file ex: start date, holidays, work days, etc. before entering in any tasks. Ensure the project name is on the first line of the Project file and all other tasks as detailed in the case are indented just once. The predecessor numbers for all subtasks will then be one higher than in the text as the first line (main task) is now the Project name. The lag mentioned in the case A section is plus lag.

Paper For Above instruction

The Nightingale Project case, consisting of Part A and Part B, serves as a comprehensive exercise to demonstrate proficiency in using Microsoft Project for effective project planning and management. This assignment emphasizes understanding the intricacies of project setup, task articulation, dependency management, and the interpretation of scheduling results. The goal is to produce accurate project files and detailed responses that reflect an understanding of project management best practices, as outlined by the core instructions.

The initial step involves thorough reading of the Nightingale Project case details, as specified in the textbook. This foundational review is essential to comprehend the scope, deliverables, constraints, and specific instructions related to the project. Familiarity with the case ensures correct setup and task arrangement within Microsoft Project, which is crucial for realistic and logical scheduling.

In addition, students are encouraged to review MS Project tutorial videos available through course resources. These tutorials provide guidance on software features, including setting up project start dates, holidays, work days, and other calendar adjustments. Mastery of these setup steps is vital for creating an accurate project schedule that reflects real-world working conditions.

For both Part A and Part B, students must create separate MS Project files (.mpp). Each file should appropriately reflect the project details as specified in the case, with the project name clearly displayed on the first line of the project file. All tasks in the project should be indented only once, maintaining a logical hierarchy and clarity. Predecessor relationships must be established correctly, with the successor tasks’ predecessor numbers being incrementally higher, corresponding to their position in the task list. Attention to detail in task dependencies, lag times (notably the plus lag in section A), and resource allocations are critical to producing a realistic project schedule.

Alongside the project files, students are expected to prepare a comprehensive MS Word document. This document should answer all assigned questions, specifically questions 1-3 for Part A and questions 1-4 for Part B. The responses should be detailed, referencing specific elements from the MS Project files to demonstrate understanding and interpretation of the scheduling outcomes.

It is also imperative to document the MS Project version used in the submission comments to ensure clarity and reproducibility of results. Prior to starting the project setup, reviewing all case instructions and technical details is recommended. Setting up the project environment correctly from the outset—such as configuring start dates, holidays, and workdays—will contribute to accurate and meaningful scheduling results.

References

  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2017). Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press.
  • Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). PMI.
  • Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2020). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Wysocki, R. K. (2019). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Wiley.
  • Knott, P., & Ingen-Housz, A. (2009). Project Scheduling and Critical Path Method. Routledge.
  • Heldman, K. (2018). Project Management JumpStart. Wiley.
  • Larson, R., & Gray, C. (2021). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Haugan, G. (2002). Critical Chain Project Management. ARZ Publishers.
  • Gido, J., & Clements, J. (2018). Successful Project Management. Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments