Nr533 Touchpoint Reflection Experience Table Your Names Heal

Nr533 Touchpoint Reflections Experience Tableyour Names Healthcare O

Reflective writing is more than recalling and recording an event or experience. It’s about sharing the experience through thoughts, feelings, and reactions that lead to a new way of thinking. It involves finding meaning in the experience to learn how to improve, what to avoid, or what to repeat. Participants begin by recalling the who, what, when, where, and how of an experience without emotion or interpretation. Then, they reflect on their thoughts, feelings, and insights about the experience, followed by an analysis of what was learned and how that learning can inform future actions or perspectives.

The Touchpoint Reflections are evaluated based on three components: Experience, Reflection, and Implication. For each component, focused responses must be provided—describing the experience objectively, expressing personal thoughts and feelings, and synthesizing lessons learned that impact future behavior. Adherence to correct writing conventions and formal academic style, using first person and active voice, is essential. The process encourages deep engagement with personal and professional experiences to foster growth and learning.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Reflective practice is fundamental to personal and professional growth, especially within healthcare management, where understanding the intricacies of organizational dynamics and leadership approaches can significantly influence outcomes. This paper explores two distinct organizational incidents—one involving shared leadership in a university setting and another involving bureaucratic challenges at United Airlines. By analyzing these experiences through reflection, implications, and evaluation, I aim to understand the complexities of leadership, organizational culture, and structure, and how they inform effective management practices.

Experience

The first incident involved Carol T. Christ, who succeeded Nicholas Dirks as chancellor of the University of California at Berkeley. Unlike her predecessors who did not consult other decision-makers, Christ engaged with student leadership to understand their perspectives, exemplified by her meeting with Frances McGinley, the student vice president. This move reflected a shared leadership approach, fostering a collaborative environment. Similarly, at a high school in Essex, England, Jill Martin and David Barrs adopted a shared leadership model, each taking charge of specific areas, meeting daily to make decisions and challenge each other. These instances demonstrated organizational efforts to decentralize authority, promote responsiveness, and leverage diverse perspectives. Conversely, the second incident centered on United Airlines’ rigid bureaucracy, characterized by excessive rule-following, which hindered employee flexibility and resulted in public relations crises. Incidents such as the forcibly removed passenger and the ejected couple highlighted the inflexibility of strict policies and the consequences of a highly hierarchical, rule-bound organizational culture.

Reflection

Reflecting on these experiences, I recognize the vital role of leadership models in shaping organizational culture and response effectiveness. In the university setting, shared leadership fosters inclusivity and adaptive decision-making, which are crucial in dynamic environments. The move by Christ to engage stakeholders contrasts sharply with traditional hierarchical leadership, emphasizing the importance of collaboration and collective responsibility. This approach resonates with my own belief that leadership should empower team members and facilitate open communication, especially amid complex challenges.

In contrast, United Airlines' bureaucratic structure, with its rigid adherence to rules, appears detrimental to organizational agility and customer service. My emotional response to the airline incidents was one of frustration and concern about the prioritization of rule enforcement over human compassion. This reinforced my understanding that overly strict bureaucratic policies can undermine operational flexibility and damage organizational reputation. It prompted me to consider how organizational culture influences employee discretion and decision-making, and how too much rigidity may stifle initiative and adaptability.

Implication

From these reflections, I learned that effective leadership requires a balance between structure and flexibility. Shared leadership, with its emphasis on collaboration and distributed responsibility, can improve responsiveness and foster innovation, especially in complex environments. It encourages diverse perspectives, enhances team performance, and mitigates the limitations of individual centralized authority. However, implementing shared leadership necessitates addressing potential obstacles, such as role ambiguity, conflicts, and the need for mutual trust. Solutions include clear communication, defined roles, and fostering a culture of trust and accountability.

Regarding organizational structure, I learned that bureaucratic rigidity, while ensuring compliance and consistency, can be detrimental if it inhibits responsiveness. Therefore, as a future leader, I will strive to cultivate organizational flexibility by promoting shared leadership initiatives where appropriate, encouraging autonomy, and reducing unnecessary complexity. In practice, job design elements such as empowering employees, designing cross-functional teams, and fostering open communication channels will be critical to enhancing shared leadership effectiveness. Redesigning roles to include decision-making authority and opportunities for collaboration can cultivate a more dynamic, responsive organizational culture.

Furthermore, I acknowledge that nonshared, traditional leadership approaches may be preferable in certain situations. For example, during crises requiring swift, decisive action, hierarchical centralized leadership provides clarity and quick decision-making. In high-stakes environments, such as during a medical emergency, a clear chain of command ensures swift responses, reducing ambiguity and confusion. Situational factors like organizational size, task complexity, and urgency influence the appropriateness of shared versus traditional leadership models. Likewise, individual characteristics, such as experience, confidence, and expertise, determine whether a shared or directive approach will be more effective.

Conclusion

These organizational incidents and reflections underscore the importance of adaptable leadership strategies. Shared leadership can foster innovation, inclusivity, and responsiveness but requires careful implementation to overcome potential obstacles. Conversely, traditional hierarchical models may be effective in specific, high-pressure situations where clarity and speed are paramount. As a future healthcare leader, I will aim to balance these approaches, fostering a culture that encourages collaboration while recognizing circumstances that benefit from decisive, authoritative leadership. Continual reflection and adaptation will be essential to navigating complex organizational landscapes effectively.

References

• Cazort, D. (1992). Under the Grammar Hammer: The 25 Most Important Grammar Mistakes and How to Avoid Them. Lowell House.
• Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (2017). The Elements of Style (4th ed.). Pearson.
• Fitzsimons, D. (2019). The dynamics of shared leadership. Harvard Business Review.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• H setbacks, S., & Searle, R. (2020). Organizational culture and leadership in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management.
• Patagonia. (2020). Our culture. Patagonia Official Website.
• United Airlines. (2017). Customer safety and service policies. United Airlines Official Statements.
• Gordon, J. (2019). Bureaucracy in organizations: Pros and cons. Organizational Dynamics.
• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2015). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review.
• Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.