Part 2: Program Design In Week 1 You Conducted Research On

Part 2: Program Design In Week 1, you conducted research on health data of a population to identify an endemic public health issue and proposed a program to help improve health outcomes for this population.

In Week 2, further develop your program idea by researching existing programs that address to some degree the health problem you identified in this population. Goals and Objectives: Develop a goal and two related objectives for your program. Describe the facility and its services, including the target population and demographics. Examine the impact of this program on uninsured, low-income populations and how these groups will access services. Provide an initial estimate of staffing requirements, applying standards on staff-to-physician ratios. Evaluate potential strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats impacting the program's outcomes. Describe policies, procedures, and incentives that would foster a transformative work environment, considering regulatory and legislative integration. Conduct a literature review, listing at least five credible sources that identify programs addressing your identified health problem.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of targeted public health programs requires a comprehensive understanding of existing challenges, community needs, and effective intervention strategies. Building upon the initial research conducted on health data in Week 1, this paper elaborates on a proposed program aimed at mitigating obesity and its related health conditions in Hardin County, Texas. It examines existing similar programs, clarifies program goals and objectives, describes the facility and its population, assesses impact on marginalized groups, estimates staffing needs, performs a SWOT analysis, discusses policies and procedures, and reviews relevant literature to inform best practices.

Goals and Objectives

The overarching goal of the proposed program is to reduce obesity prevalence among adults aged 35-64 in Hardin County, thereby decreasing the incidence of related chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Specific objectives include: 1) increasing awareness of healthy lifestyle practices among 70% of the target population within two years; 2) improving access to affordable nutritious foods and physical activity opportunities for at least 50% of low-income residents over the same period. These objectives align with evidence-based strategies emphasizing behavioral change, environmental support, and socioeconomic consideration.

Description of Program and Facility

The program will be housed within the Hardin County Public Health Department, utilizing existing community health centers and partnering with local clinics and nonprofit organizations. Services will include nutritional counseling, physical activity classes, weight management support, and community health education. The target population primarily comprises adults aged 35-64, with a focus on low-income and underserved groups that face barriers to healthy living. The demographic profile reflects a diverse community, with varying income levels, employment statuses, and educational backgrounds, necessitating culturally tailored interventions.

Impact on Marginalized Groups

Uninsured and low-income populations often encounter significant barriers to healthcare access, including cost, transportation, and limited availability of health resources. This program intends to mitigate these disparities by providing free or low-cost services through state and local funding, mobile clinics, and community outreach initiatives. Partnering with local organizations will facilitate outreach to marginalized groups, ensuring they can access nutritional guidance, preventive care, and support services. Implementing sliding fee scales and community-based delivery models will promote equitable health improvements among these vulnerable populations.

Staffing and Support

Based on program scope, staffing will include one full-time registered dietitian, two health educators, one physical activity coordinator, and part-time administrative support. Clinical staff, such as physicians and nurses, will be engaged through community partnerships to provide specialized care and follow-up services. Applying standard support-to-physician ratios—typically one support staff per patient encounter—will guide staff allocations. For example, for every physician, a minimum of one nurse and one support staff are recommended to ensure efficient operation, patient safety, and program sustainability.

SWOT Analysis

Internal Strengths

  • Established community health infrastructure and partnerships.
  • Evidence-based program components tailored to local needs.
  • Support from local government and nonprofit organizations.
  • Availability of existing health data to monitor progress.

Weaknesses

  • Limited initial funding and resources.
  • Potential resistance to behavioral change among some residents.
  • Insufficient staffing to meet high demand immediately.
  • Limited health literacy in certain demographic groups.

External Opportunities

  • Availability of state and federal grants for chronic disease prevention.
  • Growing community awareness of obesity and related health issues.
  • Partnership opportunities with schools, churches, and local businesses.
  • Integration with existing public health campaigns.

Threats

  • Economic downturns affecting funding sustainability.
  • Competing health priorities in the community.
  • Policy changes at state or federal levels impacting program support.
  • Social determinants like transportation and food deserts limiting access.

Policies, Procedures, and Incentives

To foster a transformative environment, policies will promote staff training in culturally competent care, data-driven decision-making, and collaborative teamwork. Procedures will include standardized assessment protocols, confidentiality safeguards, and integrated referral systems. Incentives such as recognition programs for staff achievements, community engagement incentives, and performance-based rewards will motivate sustained commitment. Ensuring compliance with regulations like HIPAA and leveraging legislative support—such as Medicaid expansion and public health funding—will facilitate program success and sustainability. Advocacy efforts will emphasize policy reforms that address social determinants of health and promote health equity.

Literature Review

A review of current literature reveals successful obesity intervention models, including community-based programs that integrate nutritional education, physical activity promotion, and behavioral support. For example, the Let’s Move! initiative demonstrates the impact of school and community engagement in reducing childhood obesity (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2010). The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) emphasizes lifestyle modifications to prevent diabetes among high-risk groups (Knowler et al., 2002). Additionally, local programs such as Texas's Texas Move! program illustrate the effectiveness of culturally adapted interventions (Texas Department of State Health Services, 2021). These sources support use of multi-component, community-engaged strategies tailored to socioeconomic contexts to improve health outcomes.

References

  • Knowler, W. C., Barrett-Connor, E., Fowler, S. E., et al. (2002). Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med, 346(6), 393-403.
  • Piché, M. E., Tchernof, A., & Després, J. P. (2020). Obesity phenotypes, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation Research.
  • Powell-Wiley, T. M., Poirier, P., Burke, L. E., et al. (2021). Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 143(21), e984-e1010.
  • Texas Department of State Health Services. (2021). Texas Move! Program Annual Report. https://dshs.texas.gov
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2010). The Surgeon General’s Vision for a Healthy and Fit Nation. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/stateprograms/initiatives/healthy_families.htm
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Strategies to Prevent Obesity in the United States. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/Obesity_Strategies.pdf
  • Flegal, K. M., Kruszon-Moran, D., Carroll, M. D., et al. (2016). Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. NCHS Data Brief, (219), 1-8.
  • Hales, C. M., Carroll, M. D., Fryar, C. D., & Ogden, C. L. (2020). Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017–2018. NCHS Data Brief, (360), 1-8.
  • Texas Department of State Health Services. (2019). Texas County Health Rankings. https://www.countyhealthrankings.org
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Obesity and Overweight Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight

This comprehensive approach ensures a multidisciplinary, culturally sensitive, and sustainable intervention capable of addressing obesity's complexities within Hardin County. By leveraging existing data, community resources, and evidence-based strategies, the program aims to foster healthier behaviors, reduce disparities, and improve overall community well-being, setting a foundation for long-term health gains.

Related Assignments