Part I: Review The 7 Steps To Solving A Problem Attachment

Part I: Review the “7 Steps to Solving a Problem†attachment above

Part I: Review the “7 Steps to Solving a Problem†attachment above

Part II: Read the story below: You are currently working at a small company of about 100 employees. Your company just lost a very large client and therefore they need to let go of five employees in your department. The workload of the five employees has been divided up between you and a fellow employee. Your fellow employee is very upset about this because now they must take on more work and not get a pay raise. This employee wants you to join them and fight your boss together for more money.

You don't feel comfortable doing this because you love your job. You would like to make more money, but you do not want to upset anyone and lose your position. On top of this situation, there is a big project that needs to be completed in three days! How would you solve the above problem? Review the “7 Steps to Solving a Problem†attachment.

Reflect on, and discuss, how the problem described above can be resolved using the steps. Analyze and explain your application of each of the 7 steps in the “7 Steps to Solving a Problem†attachment to solving the problem described in the above story. Your submission should be a minimum of one page of content in length. Please type the question as well as your answer. Properly cite any source utilized in APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

The scenario presented encapsulates a complex workplace dilemma involving employee relations, personal ethics, and task management, which can be effectively addressed through a structured problem-solving approach, specifically the 7 Steps to Solving a Problem. This methodical framework guides individuals in analyzing issues comprehensively, generating solutions, and implementing effective actions. Here, each step is applied to the case to demonstrate its utility in resolving the outlined difficulties.

Step 1: Identify the Problem

The first step involves clearly defining the core issue. In this situation, the primary problem is the tension arising from workload redistribution after the company’s layoff, compounded by the coworker’s desire to protest for higher wages, and the looming deadline of a significant project. The employee must navigate how to address the workload imbalance and coworker dissatisfaction without jeopardizing their employment or integrity, all while completing a critical project within three days.

Step 2: Gather Information

Effective problem-solving requires collecting relevant facts. This includes understanding the company’s policies on layoffs, pay raises, and employee grievances. Information about the coworker’s motivations, the boss’s stance, and the project requirements is also crucial. Additionally, assessing the workload distribution and the potential impact of joining the coworker’s protest on the employee’s job security and workload is vital. Gathering insights from HR policies, consulting with trusted colleagues, and reviewing the project scope form the basis for informed decision-making.

Step 3: Generate Possible Solutions

Next, brainstorm multiple solutions, such as negotiating directly with management for a fair workload or a temporary pay increase, seeking mediation through HR, or completing the work efficiently to meet the deadline while maintaining good relationships. The employee could also consider talking privately to the supervisor about workload concerns or exploring alternative ways to address the coworker’s grievances without confrontation. Generating diverse options ensures flexibility in choosing the most appropriate course of action.

Step 4: Evaluate Alternatives

Assess each potential solution considering factors like feasibility, consequences, and alignment with personal and organizational values. For example, confronting the boss might risk job security but could lead to a resolution; conversely, refusing to join the protest preserves job stability but leaves the coworker dissatisfied. Prioritizing solutions that balance ethics, relationship harmony, and project deadlines is essential. Evaluating risks and benefits guides in selecting strategies that are effective and ethically sound.

Step 5: Choose the Best Solution

Based on evaluation, the optimal solution might be to have a discreet conversation with the manager about workload adjustments and project timelines. This maintains professionalism and integrity while addressing workload concerns. Simultaneously, offering support to the coworker without participating in collective protest preserves the work relationship. This approach provides a balance of maintaining employment, meeting project deadlines, and respecting coworker feelings.

Step 6: Implement the Solution

Executing the chosen approach involves preparing for the discussion with management, clearly articulating workload challenges, and proposing feasible solutions. It also entails supporting the coworker informally, showing empathy without endorsing protest actions. Effective implementation requires communication skills, diplomacy, and a focus on collaborative problem-solving to ensure the solution is accepted and effective.

Step 7: Follow-up and Evaluate

After implementation, the employee should monitor the outcomes of their actions. This includes checking if workload adjustments are made, if the project is completed successfully, and if relationships with colleagues are maintained. Follow-up might involve periodic check-ins with supervisors and colleagues to ensure the problem remains addressed. Reflection on what worked well and what could be improved fosters ongoing professional growth and future problem-solving effectiveness.

Conclusion

Applying the 7 Steps to Solving a Problem provides a structured, ethical, and effective framework to navigate workplace conflicts and challenges. In this scenario, it facilitates a balanced approach—protecting job security, upholding personal integrity, and ensuring project completion—while maintaining positive relationships with colleagues and management. This methodical process underscores the importance of deliberate analysis and strategic action in achieving sustainable resolutions in complex work environments.

References

• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Johnson, C. E. (2018). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: Casting light or shadow? Sage Publications.
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson Education.
• Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Approaches to conflict resolution. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 1-11.
• Moore, M. T., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2020). Strategies for resolving workplace conflicts. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 121-134.
• Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
• Schweiger, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2010). Team conflict. In K. S. Cameron & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 406–422). Oxford University Press.
• Thomas, K. W. (1996). Techniques for resolving conflict. In K. W. Thomas (Ed.), Conflict and negotiation (pp. 97-114). Jossey-Bass.
• Ury, W. (2015). Getting past no: Negotiating in difficult situations. Bantam.
• Weingart, L. R., et al. (2006). Managing conflict in teams. Harvard Business Review, 84(8), 119-126.