Portfolio Project: Pick One Assignment To Complete For Class ✓ Solved

Portfolio Project: Pick one assignment to complete for clas

Portfolio Project: Pick one assignment to complete for clas s. Choose one of the two assignments below and follow the essential deliverables. For Portfolio Project #1: Human Resources Strategic Plan. Create a strategic plan that aligns the HR function with the organization's mission, vision, and objectives, and propose a Shared Services structure for HR. The final deliverable should include: Title Page, Table of Contents, Executive Summary, Body of your plan, Conclusion, Reference Page, Appendix (optional); minimum ten pages; five credible sources in APA format. For Portfolio Project #2: Human Resources Interview and Strategic Alignment. Conduct a one-on-one interview with a HR leader in a generalist leadership position to assess the alignment of the HR department with the organization’s vision, mission, and goals. Provide an analysis and evaluation of the alignment, including the interview questions (at least 15 questions). The final deliverable should include: Title Page, Executive Summary, Analysis and Evaluation of Alignment, Conclusion, Reference Page, Appendix (optional); minimum ten pages; five credible sources; and follow CSU-Global APA guidelines.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction and scope. The two Portfolio Project options presented to CSU-Global students both foreground a central truth: human resources (HR) cannot operate in a vacuum separate from organizational strategy. When HR activities are tightly aligned with mission, vision, and strategic goals, the organization gains employees who contribute to sustainable competitive advantage. This paper selects Portfolio Project #1, the Human Resources Strategic Plan, as the basis for analysis. The purpose is to design a concrete HR strategy that integrates with an organization’s overarching objectives, proposes a Shared Services structure to improve efficiency and consistency, and specifies the governance, metrics, and implementation steps necessary to realize the plan (Bratton & Gold, 2017; Kaplan & Norton, 1996).

Theoretical framing. Strategic HR management argues that HR practices should be designed to drive organizational performance. Be it talent acquisition, development, or engagement, the link between HR outcomes and business results is strongest when HR is treated as a strategic partner rather than a transactional function (Becker, Huselid, & Ulrich, 2001; Ulrich et al., 2013). The HR Scorecard provides a framework to translate organizational strategy into HR-specific measures that reflect workforce capability, organizational capability, and financial impact (Becker et al., 2001). In this approach, HR metrics become a lens through which leadership can monitor alignment and adjust strategies in real time (Kaplan & Norton, 1996). The foundational works of Bratton and Gold (2017) on HR theory and practice emphasize how HR must align with business strategy to create value.

Proposed strategic framework. The plan envisions a Shared Services HR model as the anchor for efficiency and scale. This model typically includes a Center of Expertise (CoE) to handle specialized domains (e.g., talent management, compensation, analytics) and a Transactions/Shared Services Center that delivers routine HR processes (Becker et al., 2001; Ulrich et al., 2013). The overall governance structure should ensure clear accountability for strategy development, service delivery, and performance measurement. The HR function would partner with business units to translate strategic goals into talent implications, capability requirements, and workforce plans (Snell & Bohlander, 2012).

Vision, mission, and objectives alignment. The HR strategic plan should explicitly map HR objectives to the organization’s mission and vision. For example, if the organization’s mission emphasizes high-quality patient care and rapid emergency response, HR priorities would emphasize selecting candidates with the right clinical competencies, agility under pressure, and a culture of teamwork and safety. The plan should articulate how HR processes—recruitment, onboarding, training, performance management, and employee relations—support those priorities and drive the desired patient outcomes (Huselid, Jackson, & Schuler, 1997).

Measurement and analytics. A core element is a robust metrics framework rooted in the Balanced Scorecard approach. Key HR metrics might include time-to-fill, cost-per-hire, turnover rates, employee engagement, training ROI, and quality-of-hire indicators. A dashboard should present leading indicators (e.g., candidate pipeline health, critical skill availability) and lagging indicators (e.g., retention of critical staff, patient outcomes linked to staff performance). The HR Scorecard model provides a blueprint for linking HR outcomes to strategic goals and financial performance (Becker et al., 2001). The integration of analytics—HR data, workforce planning, and predictive modeling—supports proactive decision-making (Cascio & Montealegre, 2016).

Implementation plan and governance. Implementation unfolds in phases: (1) diagnostic and design; (2) build CoE and Shared Services Center; (3) implement core HR processes within the new structure; (4) roll out analytics, dashboards, and governance mechanisms; (5) continuous improvement and change management. A strong change-management posture is essential, as changes in HR structures and processes touch trust, culture, and daily workflows. Kotter’s change principles emphasize creating urgency, building guiding coalitions, and sustaining momentum (Kotter, 1996). Regular executive sponsorship and cross-functional governance ensure alignment with business priorities and budget realities (Armstrong, 2020).

Budget alignment and resource planning. The HR budget must be aligned with the organization’s financial plan. This includes capital for HR technology, data analytics capabilities, training programs, and staffing for the CoE and Shared Services Center. A clear linkage between HR investments and tangible outcomes—reduced time-to-hire, improved retention, enhanced patient care metrics—helps justify the investment and support ongoing improvements (Kaplan & Norton, 1996; Bratton & Gold, 2017).

Talent management and culture. The plan emphasizes how onboarding, development, and performance management reinforce the desired organizational culture and business goals. Recruitment should prioritize not only technical qualifications but also behavioral competencies that enable teams to function effectively under high-stress conditions (Becker et al., 2001). Regular performance appraisal cycles, recognition programs, and team-based collaboration incentives can sustain a culture of excellence and safety (Huselid et al., 1997).

Ethical and legal considerations. The strategic plan must comply with employment law, privacy, and safety regulations, particularly in high-stakes environments like emergency medical services. Transparent HR policies and equitable practices contribute to trust and organizational resilience. Research-based HR practice emphasizes fairness, safety, and ethical considerations as part of strategic implementation (Bratton & Gold, 2017).

Conclusion. A well-designed HR strategic plan with a Shared Services structure can deliver operational efficiencies, stronger alignment with organizational goals, and improved outcomes for patients and communities served. By embedding analytics, governance, and culture-building into HR processes, the organization can realize a sustainable competitive advantage derived from its people (Ulrich et al., 2013; Kaplan & Norton, 1996).

References to the theoretical and empirical literature provide a foundation for the proposed plan and demonstrate how HR strategy translates into measurable organizational value. The recommended path aligns with established HR theory and practice while remaining adaptable to the specific needs and constraints of an emergency medical services context (Becker, Huselid, & Ulrich, 2001; Bratton & Gold, 2017; Cascio & Montealegre, 2016). This alignment is essential for driving performance, enhancing patient care, and sustaining the organization’s mission over time (Huselid, Jackson, & Schuler, 1997; Snell & Bohlander, 2012; Armstrong, 2020).

In-text citations throughout the paper reinforce the integration of HR strategy with organizational strategy and provide an evidence-based articulation of the benefits of a Shared Services HR model and a strong measurement framework (Becker et al., 2001; Kaplan & Norton, 1996; Ulrich et al., 2013). The final deliverable will detail the strategic plan in a comprehensive document suitable for executive review and implementation within the organization (Becker et al., 2001; Bratton & Gold, 2017).

References

  • Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR Scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bratton, J., & Gold, J. (2017). Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
  • Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2013). HR from the Outside In: Six competencies for the future of HR. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is reshaping HR: The role of HR analytics and big data. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(1), 9-25.
  • Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (1997). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 775-787.
  • Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., & Valentine, S. R. (2017). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Snell, S., & Bohlander, G. (2012). Managing Human Resources (17th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (15th ed.). Kogan Page.

Related Assignments