Post Response Guidelines: Respond To The Following Explain W
Post Response Guidelines Respond To The Followingexplain Why Firms
Explain why firms experience evolutionary cycles in which there is a fight between strategy and structure, punctuated with periods in which strategy and structure are reshaped. Provide examples of global firms that have experienced this pattern. Choose a CEO of a prominent firm that you believe exemplifies the positive aspects of strategic leadership. What actions has this CEO taken that demonstrate effective strategic leadership? What are the effects of those actions on the firm's performance? *250 words
Paper For Above instruction
Firms often go through evolutionary cycles characterized by a tension between strategy and structure, a phenomenon rooted in the dynamic nature of organizational development and external environmental pressures. This ongoing struggle arises because as a firm’s strategy evolves to adapt to market changes, its existing structure may become mismatched, impeding effective implementation. To realign, organizations must periodically modify their structures, creating periods of tension and adjustment. This cycle reflects the ongoing need for alignment between strategic intent and organizational capability, leading to periods of instability followed by restructured stability.
An illustrative example is Apple Inc., which experienced such cycles during its transition from Steve Jobs’ return to the company in 1997. Initially, the company's strategy shifted towards innovation and premium product differentiation, which required a more flexible and decentralized structure. However, as the company grew rapidly, its existing bureaucratic structure hindered innovation, prompting a strategic and structural overhaul in the form of a more centralized, streamlined hierarchy under Tim Cook's leadership. This restructuring helped reinforce Apple's innovation-driven strategy and enhanced operational efficiency.
Among the prominent CEOs exemplifying positive strategic leadership is Satya Nadella of Microsoft. Nadella's actions—such as fostering a growth mindset, emphasizing cloud computing, and encouraging collaboration—demonstrated his effective strategic vision. He shifted the company's focus from traditional software to cloud-based services, leading to a significant increase in revenue and market share. Nadella’s emphasis on culture and innovation revitalized Microsoft, illustrating how strategic leadership can positively impact firm performance by aligning organizational capabilities with evolving strategic priorities.
References
- Christensen, C. M., & Overdorf, M. (2000). Meeting the challenge of disruptive change. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 66–76.
- Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy. Pearson Education.
- Nadella, S. (2017). Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft’s Soul and Imagine a Better Future. Harper Business.
- Sull, D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Competing through organizational design. Harvard Business Review, 93(5), 52–62.
- Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.
- Porter's Competitive Strategy. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
- Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 72(4), 75–84.
- Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Wiley.
- Collis, D. J., & Rukstad, M. G. (2008). Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review, 86(4), 82–90.
- Collins, J., & Porras, J. (2004). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. Harper Business.