PowerPoint Presentation Directions: Review The Case Study 2

Powerpoint Presentationdirections1 Review The Case Study2 Download

PowerPoint Presentation Directions: 1. Review the case study. 2. Download the provided PowerPoint template to create a presentation that includes: · Your name on the title slide of the presentation · Identification of two or more issues with existing system · Identification of “work-a-round†solutions when using existing system · Overview of standard language used only in nursing · Overview of multidisciplinary standard language · Set of five (5) open-ended survey questions for staff input on transitioning to the new system · Presentation is free of spelling and grammar errors.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The transition of healthcare systems toward more integrated, efficient, and clear communication frameworks is essential in providing high-quality patient care. This requires a thorough understanding of existing challenges, as well as the development of strategies for addressing them through the implementation of standardized languages and staff engagement. This paper reviews a specific case study related to healthcare communication systems, identifies key issues with the current system, explores workaround solutions, and examines the roles of standard language use both within nursing and across multidisciplinary teams. Additionally, it presents survey questions to gather staff input for the transition process, emphasizing the importance of inclusive communication and effective change management.

Identification of Issues with Existing System

The case study highlights several issues with the current healthcare communication framework. First, inconsistency in the use of medical terminologies creates confusion and hampers effective communication among healthcare providers (Schmitt et al., 2019). When terminology varies between departments or professionals, errors in patient care processes can occur, risking safety and outcomes. Second, the reliance on free-text or non-standard documentation significantly impacts data retrieval, analysis, and interoperability (Spath, 2020). The absence of uniform language makes it difficult to synthesize patient information accurately or to ensure continuity of care across providers. Another issue concerns the resistance to change among staff, who may be accustomed to traditional documentation methods and wary of adopting new systems (Mitzner et al., 2019). These barriers complicate implementation efforts and delay the realization of improved communication benefits.

Work-Around Solutions in Use

In response to deficiencies of the existing system, healthcare staff often resort to work-around solutions to ensure continuity of care. One common strategy involves the use of abbreviations and acronyms that are familiar within specific hospital units or disciplines, which can hasten documentation but risk ambiguity (Chung et al., 2021). Staff may also develop informal protocols or mnemonic devices to bypass cumbersome sections of the system, thus maintaining workflow efficiency at the expense of standardization. Additionally, some practitioners rely heavily on verbal communication or handwritten notes as supplementary methods when electronic system limitations are encountered. While these solutions temporarily bridge gaps, they can contribute to information fragmentation and increase the possibility of errors, emphasizing the need for a more unified, standardized system.

Standard Language Used Only in Nursing

Nursing employs a specialized set of terminologies designed to clearly articulate patient assessments, interventions, and outcomes. The Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) are prominent standardized languages that facilitate precise documentation and communication among nurses and other healthcare professionals (Bulechek et al., 2018). These terminologies enable nurses to specify interventions such as "nutrition management" or "pain management" with universally understood codes and descriptors, improving interoperability and quality of care. The use of standardized nursing language not only enhances clarity but also supports research and evidence-based practice by providing consistent data for analysis (Saba et al., 2019). Importantly, nursing-specific language complements broader medical lexicons, ensuring nursing roles are accurately represented within interdisciplinary communication.

Multidisciplinary Standard Language

Beyond nursing, healthcare relies on comprehensive multilingual terminologies that promote seamless communication across disciplines. The Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine—Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) exemplifies a holistic, multilingual coding system that encompasses diagnoses, procedures, and clinical findings—a vital resource for multidisciplinary teams (Johnson et al., 2020). Use of SNOMED CT supports interoperability between electronic health records (EHRs), enhances the accuracy of documentation, and enables data sharing across different healthcare settings. Moreover, employing standardized language such as LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) for laboratory results and imaging reports further streamlines the exchange of diagnostic information between providers (Dowling et al., 2021). The integration of multidisciplinary standard language fosters collaborative decision-making, reduces errors, and enhances patient safety by ensuring all team members interpret data consistently.

Survey Questions for Staff Input on Transition

To facilitate an effective transition toward a standardized healthcare communication system, staff input is critical. The following five open-ended survey questions aim to gather meaningful insights from staff members involved in patient care:

1. What challenges do you foresee with transitioning to the new standardized communication system? Please describe specific concerns or potential barriers.
2. In your opinion, what training or resources would best support your adaptation to the new system?
3. How do you feel the new standardized language will impact patient safety and quality of care?
4. What suggestions do you have for encouraging staff engagement and buy-in during the implementation process?
5. Can you share any ideas for ongoing support or feedback mechanisms to improve system adoption and effectiveness?

These questions are designed to elicit honest, comprehensive feedback that can inform tailored implementation strategies, promote staff involvement, and address potential issues proactively.

Conclusion

Effective healthcare communication is fundamental to delivering safe, efficient, and coordinated patient care. The case study underscores existing system constraints, highlighting the need for robust, standardized languages to bridge disciplinary gaps and reduce errors. While workaround solutions currently mitigate some issues, they do not replace the necessity for a comprehensive, standardized approach. Nursing-specific terminologies such as NIC and NOC play a vital role within the nursing domain, while multidisciplinary systems like SNOMED CT enhance collaboration across the care team. Engaging staff through open-ended surveys ensures their insights and concerns are addressed, facilitating smoother transitions and sustained improvements. Ultimately, embracing standardized language and fostering a collaborative environment are essential steps towards achieving interoperability, safety, and excellence in healthcare delivery.

References

• Bulechek, G. M., Butcher, H. K., & Dochterman, J. M. (2018). Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC). Elsevier.
• Chung, Y., Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2021). Impact of standardization and abbreviations on clinical documentation. Journal of Medical Systems, 45(4), 87-98.
• Dowling, S., Worthington, P., & Johnson, J. (2021). The role of LOINC in health data exchange. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 115, 103658.
• Johnson, S. B., Collier, M., & Kaye, R. (2020). SNOMED CT for clinical data interoperability. Journal of Health Information Management, 34(2), 45-52.
• Mitzner, T. L., Rogers, W. A., & Charness, N. (2019). Barriers to healthcare system change for healthcare professionals. Aging & Mental Health, 23(12), 1742-1750.
• Saba, V., McNeill, M., & Pajnkihar, M. (2019). Use of standardized nursing terminologies for quality improvement. Nursing Outlook, 67(4), 390-399.
• Schmitt, E. M., Shever, L. L., & Molinari, V. (2019). Risk factors for medical errors related to communication failures. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 95, 191-199.
• Spath, P. (2020). Data interoperability challenges in healthcare. Health Data Management, 28(3), 22-27.