Prior To Beginning Work On This Discussion, Read The Stages ✓ Solved

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read The Stages

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read The Stages of Group Development: A Retrospective Study of Dynamic Team Processes article, watch the 12 Angry Men - Original Live TV Version 1954 film and the Team Development: Leadership Essentials video episode which demonstrates the stages of group development. Apply different scenes of the movie or short film to each of the stages of group development as formulated by Tuckman, as discussed in Chapter 2 of Leadership Essentials. Describe at least one lesson that you learned about leading a group through hard times. Your discussion post should be 250 words.

Paper For Above Instructions

The film 12 Angry Men serves as an excellent illustration of Tuckman's stages of group development: forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Each of these stages is critical in understanding how groups evolve and how leadership plays a significant role in navigating challenges.

Forming

In the beginning of the movie, the jurors gather, exemplifying the forming stage. They are introduced to one another and begin to understand the task at hand: reaching a verdict on a murder case. Initial opinions are tentative, reflecting the cautious atmosphere as the jurors vie for leadership roles.

Storming

As the discussions progress, the jurors enter the storming stage, characterized by conflict and disagreement. Juror 3, passionately advocating for a guilty verdict, clashes with Juror 8, who stands alone in his reasonable doubts. This stage underscores the importance of conflict resolution and open communication, as the jurors struggle to engage with differing viewpoints.

Norming

Eventually, the group transitions into the norming stage as they begin to establish norms for discussion. They more effectively share their perspectives and address tensions. As Juror 12's dismissive attitude evolves into a more cooperative stance, the group aligns their decision-making process, fostering an atmosphere of collaboration.

Performing

In the performing stage, the jurors work cohesively, leveraging their strengths to analyze the evidence presented. They critically discuss various aspects of the case, showcasing their collective problem-solving abilities. This unity is pivotal in reaching a fair verdict, demonstrating how effective teamwork can emerge from a previously discordant environment.

Adjourning

Finally, the adjourning stage occurs as the jurors reach a unanimous decision. The moment reflects not just the conclusion of their task but also the relationships they have built throughout the trial. Jurors express their newfound respect for each other, revealing the personal growth experienced during the deliberation process.

One key lesson about leading a group through hard times drawn from this film is that transparency and collaboration are essential in transforming conflicts into constructive outcomes. Juror 8 epitomizes the qualities of effective leadership by maintaining an open dialogue and encouraging others to share their perspectives, which facilitates a more thorough examination of the case. His ability to empathize with others inspires dialogue, enables progress, and ultimately leads to a fair conclusion. Moreover, it underscores the value of patience during contentious discussions, allowing the group to navigate through its challenges effectively.

In conclusion, Tuckman's stages of group development are manifest in 12 Angry Men, showcasing the journey of a group from initial uncertainty to a cohesive decision-making body. The film serves as a timeless reminder of the dynamics of teamwork, illustrating that through effective leadership and open communication, groups can transcend conflict to achieve their goals.

References

• Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.
• Fisher, R. J., & Ury, W. L. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
• Levi, D. (2016). Group Dynamics for Teams. Sage Publications.
• Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes. McGraw-Hill.
• Whetten, D. A., & Cameron, K. S. (2016). Developing Management Skills. Pearson.
• Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2004). Team Composition In Organizational Settings: Issues and

  Implications. In Team Effectiveness in Organizations (pp. 39-72). Sage Publications.

• Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Brown, S. P., & Leigh, T. W. (1996). A New Look at Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort, and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358.
• Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Review Press.