Prior To Teaching Your Targeted Activity, Discuss With Your

Prior To Teaching Your Targeted Activity Discuss With Your Mentor Tea

Prior to teaching your targeted activity, discuss with your mentor teacher your objectives, activities, and assessments. Use any feedback to improve the targeted teaching plan. Implement the targeted teaching activity and related assessment with the same student you have been working with during your field experience. Then debrief the experience with your mentor teacher. In a words, discuss the results of your targeted teaching activity.

Describe the conversation you had with your mentor teacher regarding the objectives, activities, and assessments. Reflect and explain how you designed, delivered, and assessed your targeted teaching activity. Indicate how you plan to implement what you learned in your future teaching practice.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of planning, implementing, and reflecting on a targeted teaching activity is fundamental to the development of effective teaching practices. Engaging in a collaborative discussion with a mentor teacher prior to instruction offers invaluable insights that ensure objectives are clear, activities are appropriately designed, and assessments are aligned with learning goals. This reflective practice underscores the importance of professional dialogue in refining instructional strategies and improving student outcomes.

Before executing the targeted activity, I engaged in a comprehensive discussion with my mentor teacher to delineate the learning objectives, outline specific instructional activities, and determine appropriate assessment methods. This collaborative planning involved sharing my initial ideas and receiving constructive feedback aimed at optimizing the effectiveness of the lesson. The mentor provided valuable insights into student engagement strategies and suggested adjustments to better suit the individual needs of my student, which enhanced the clarity and relevance of my teaching plan.

The primary objectives of the activity revolved around fostering increased comprehension and engagement with the core content. During the planning phase, I detailed step-by-step instructional activities, including interactive discussions, visual aids, and hands-on exercises designed to accommodate diverse learning styles. The assessment component was tailored to evaluate both understanding and application, using formative assessments such as observational checklists and exit tickets, alongside summative measures like a short reflective paragraph. These assessments aligned with the objectives and provided immediate feedback to inform future instruction.

In the implementation phase, I delivered the targeted activity to the same student with whom I have been working throughout my field experience. I prioritized creating an inclusive and supportive learning environment, employing differentiated instruction methods to address the individual strengths and areas for growth. Throughout the lesson, I maintained ongoing formative assessments, adapting my approach based on student responses. For example, when the student struggled with a particular concept, I incorporated visual aids and simplified language to enhance understanding. The activity fostered active participation and encouraged the student to make connections to prior knowledge, thus promoting deep learning.

Following instruction, I debriefed with my mentor teacher to reflect on the effectiveness of the activity. We discussed the student’s engagement levels, the achievement of learning objectives, and the appropriateness of the assessment strategies. The mentor highlighted the strengths of my instructional delivery, such as my use of scaffolding and responsive questioning, and provided suggestions for further improvement, including incorporating more varied formative assessments to better gauge understanding in real-time.

Reflecting on this experience has deepened my understanding of the importance of collaborative planning and ongoing assessment. I learned that clear communication of objectives, meticulous activity design, and responsive assessment practices are crucial for fostering meaningful student learning. The experience reinforced my commitment to reflective teaching and continuous professional development. Moving forward, I plan to incorporate the insights gained from this collaboration into my future practice by engaging regularly with mentors, customizing activities to meet student needs, and utilizing varied assessments to inform instruction more effectively.

This reflective process will influence my future teaching by emphasizing the importance of flexibility and student-centered approaches. I recognize the value of ongoing communication with colleagues and mentors to refine instructional practices and improve student outcomes. Additionally, I will strive to design engaging, adaptable activities that connect with students’ interests and learning styles, ensuring that assessments serve both formative and summative purposes to guide instruction.

In conclusion, the collaborative discussion with my mentor teacher prior to instruction was instrumental in shaping a targeted teaching activity grounded in shared professional expertise. My post-activity reflection underscored the importance of adaptability, targeted assessment, and ongoing mentorship. Integrating these lessons into my teaching philosophy will enable me to foster a more inclusive, engaging, and effective learning environment in my future classrooms.

References

American Educational Research Association. (2020). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. AERA.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. Jossey-Bass.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. ASCD.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.

Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the Knowledge-Base of Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.