Project Charter Elements When Considering The Elements Of A

Project Charter Elementswhen Considering The Elements Of A Project Cha

When considering the elements of a project charter, project managers focus on the three vitally important elements of scope, cost, and time. Project managers call these elements the “triple constraint” and group them together, as modifying one will typically affect the remaining two. Although the “triple constraint” may serve as the backbone of a project charter, other elements can also prove to be important. In this discussion, you analyze how the “triple constraint” impacts the development of a project charter and describe two additional project charter elements that you believe to be influential. To prepare: Review this week’s Learning Resources on the elements of a project charter.

Think about the impact of SCOPE on the development of a project charter. By Day 1 of this week, your Instructor will assign you one element of the “triple constraint” (SCOPE). Reflect on how SCOPE impacts the development of a project charter. Consider which project charter elements aside from the “triple constraint” are highly influential. Post in 24 hours a minimum of 550 words in APA format with a minimum of 3 references which include: 1) An analysis of how the element of the “triple constraint” (SCOPE) that you were assigned impacts the development of a project charter. 2) Describe two additional elements of a project charter that you believe to be highly influential. Provide a rationale for your selections. Required Readings Biafore, B. (2010). Microsoft Project 2010: The missing manual. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly. Chapter 1, “Projects: In the Beginning”—Publicizing a Project and Its Manager (pp. 35–37) In this section of Chapter 1, the author describes the typical elements of a project charter. The author also provides guidelines for generating stakeholder support using a project charter. Coplan, S., & Masuda, D. (2011). Project management for healthcare information technology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Chapter 3, “Project Management”—Prepare Project Charter (pp. 42–43). This section of Chapter 3 explains the basic principles of preparing a project charter. The authors summarize a project charter’s key elements. Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Author. Chapter 3, “Project Management Processes”—Manage a Single Project with Networked Processes (pp. 47–61). Review this chapter, which supplies information on managing a single project that uses networked processes. Chapter 4, “Project Integration Management”—Develop Project Charter (pp. 66–72). This section details the process of developing a project charter, focusing on the inputs, outputs, tools, and techniques. Patel, V. N. (2008). Project management [Ebrary version]. Jaipur, India: Oxford. Chapter 2, “Project Origination/Initiation”—Key tasks and performers of this phase (pp. 22–74). This chapter explores the initiation phase in detail. Cortelyou-Ward, K., Noblin, A., & Martin, J. (2011). Electronic health record project initiation and early planning in a community health center. Health Care Manager, 30(2), 118–124. This article examines project initiation and early planning in health care. Kloppenborg, T. (2012). Project selection and initiation questions leading to risk management. PM World Today, 14(1), 1–5. This article presents questions for effective risk management related to creating a project charter. Eurorec.org. (n.d.). Project charter. Retrieved March 12, 2013, from This is an example of a project charter for healthcare organizations. Hart, S. (2012, July 28). PM-foundations— the project charter. Retrieved from The article reviews the core elements and considerations of a project charter. Karim, S. (2012, May 24). A project with no project charter? Retrieved from This article discusses negative outcomes when projects lack a charter. Microsoft Corporation. (2012c). Project management goal: Initiate a project. Retrieved from This article explains project initiation. Microsoft Corporation. (2012e). The project triangle. Retrieved from This article examines the impact of time, money, and scope on projects. Purdue University. (2006). Electronic health record project charter. Retrieved from An example of a healthcare project charter. University of Wisconsin-Madison. (2006). Course guides on the web: Project charter (Version 2.2). Retrieved from An example of a healthcare project charter.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The project charter serves as a foundational document that formally authorizes a project and delineates its key components, including scope, objectives, stakeholders, and constraints. Among its critical elements, the “triple constraint”—comprising scope, cost, and time—guides project planning and execution, with each component exerting significant influence over the project's success. This paper examines how the scope element affects the development of a project charter, discusses two additional influential elements, and highlights their importance in ensuring project clarity and stakeholder engagement.

Impact of Scope on Project Charter Development

Scope refers to the comprehensive description of the project’s deliverables and the boundaries within which the project operates. It essentially defines what is included and excluded from the project, shaping its overall direction and objectives. When developing a project charter, clearly articulating the scope is vital because it establishes expectations for stakeholders, aligns project goals, and lays a foundation for scope management throughout the project lifecycle. If scope is poorly defined early on, it can lead to scope creep, stakeholder dissatisfaction, and project delays (Kloppenborg, 2012). Therefore, a well-defined scope in the charter acts as a guiding document that aids in scope control by setting clear boundaries and deliverables, which subsequently influence planning, resource allocation, and risk management.

Furthermore, scope impacts the estimation of resources, timelines, and costs, as these are directly related to the scope’s complexity and extent. The scope’s clarity ensures that stakeholders understand project boundaries and expectations, facilitating better communication and reducing misunderstandings. During charter development, the scope also influences stakeholder identification and engagement, as it helps identify who needs to be involved based on their roles related to the project’s scope. Overall, scope’s accurate depiction in the project charter ensures that the project team and stakeholders have a shared understanding, reducing ambiguity and fostering commitment (Biafore, 2010).

Two Additional Influential Elements of a Project Charter

In addition to scope, two other elements stand out as highly influential in project charter success: stakeholders and risks. Each element plays a pivotal role in guiding project direction, resource allocation, and risk mitigation strategies.

Stakeholders are individuals or groups affected by or capable of influencing the project. Identifying and engaging stakeholders early in the charter development ensures their needs and expectations are incorporated, which enhances support and reduces resistance (Coplan & Masuda, 2011). A comprehensive stakeholder analysis helps in defining roles, responsibilities, and communication plans, fostering transparency and collaborative effort. Engaged stakeholders can provide critical insights during project planning, which enhances the quality and feasibility of the project. Neglecting stakeholder engagement, on the other hand, can result in misaligned expectations and project failure (Hart, 2012).

Risks are potential events or conditions that could negatively impact the project’s success. Including a risk assessment in the project charter helps identify potential threats early, allowing the project team to develop mitigation strategies. Recognizing risks upfront ensures they are integrated into the planning process, enabling proactive management rather than reactive responses. Effective risk management contributes to project stability, stakeholder confidence, and resource optimization (Kloppenborg, 2012). Omitting risk considerations from the charter can leave the project vulnerable to unforeseen issues, jeopardizing outcomes and stakeholder trust.

Conclusion

The development of a comprehensive project charter hinges on carefully defining elements such as scope, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment. Scope significantly influences project planning, resource allocation, and stakeholder expectations. Stakeholders and risks are equally vital elements that, when identified early and managed appropriately, contribute to project success by fostering alignment, transparency, and proactive mitigation. Recognizing and integrating these elements into the project charter ensures a solid foundation for executing and controlling the project effectively.

References

  • Biafore, B. (2010). Microsoft Project 2010: The missing manual. O’Reilly Media.
  • Coplan, S., & Masuda, D. (2011). Project management for healthcare information technology. McGraw-Hill.
  • Kloppenborg, T. (2012). Project selection and initiation questions leading to good risk management. PM World Today, 14(1), 1–5.
  • Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (5th ed.). PMI.
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in healthcare projects. Health Affairs.
  • Snyder, H. (2019). Risk assessment and mitigation in project management. Journal of Project Management Studies, 12(3), 45–58.
  • Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2017). Project management: The managerial process (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • PMI. (2017). The standard for program management. Project Management Institute.
  • Mitchell, R., & Thomas, E. (2014). Effective stakeholder management. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 610–620.
  • Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2002). Agile software development with Scrum. Pearson Education.

Related Assignments