Project Three Call To Action Argument Throughout The Q

Project Three Call To Action Argumentpurposethroughout The Quarter

Project Three: Call to Action Argument Purpose: Throughout the quarter, you have been creating research questions, doing research, and using that research to write essays. In the first essay, you informed yourself about a topic and considered why you wanted to know about that topic and why it is important to you. In the second essay, you informed your reader about the surprising information you found out about your topic. The purpose of this essay is for you to use those strategies to write a formal, academic classical argument that uses research. The skills you have been working on will help you with any research writing you will have to do in college and beyond.

This essay will ask you to think about your rhetorical situation in order to influence your audience and try to inspire that audience to take your side and actually do something about the issue you explore. Learning Objectives · In finding sources, students will locate and evaluate different types of evidence for logic, credibility, reliability, and bias (i.e. primary sources, online and written secondary sources) · In writing the project, students will compose a humanities style research paper that includes an evaluation of different types of evidence to support an original thesis and language appropriate for the audience and purpose · Students will identify target audiences and craft writing to correspond with reader expectations and levels of expertise · Students will synthesize their own writing with a breadth of primary and secondary sources with proper in-text citations and a list of citations to avoid plagiarism · Develop an original and effectively supported thesis that is appropriately complex and significant · give and receive useful writing suggestions during peer revision sessions.

Directions: For this assignment, you will write 850 – 1,000 word Classical argument using at least five sources (at least three of them should be peer reviewed and the rest should be reliable sources). The Classical argument will establish the context of your topic and why it is important to care about this topic and persuade your reader to take your side. The paper will include reasoned support for your audience to take your side as well as an explanation of why they should. This assignment will be turned into a website that will be presented in class. Your essay should (in other words, use the following as a checklist of things your essay should. Be doing): -Provide: a controversial language or education issue and explain how the issue creates dissent -State: a thesis that argues for your side using a claim and reasons - Provide evidence: that supports your position using at least three peer reviewed sources and two popular but valid sources - analyze: stakeholder (or audience) your audience will be people who do not care about your topic but should- and you will tell them why they should - Provide support for your thesis using personal experience and researched articles - Organize paragraphs coherently (MEAL plan) - Show awareness of rhetorical situation and rhetorical strategies - Cite all sources using proper MLA citation style - Format paper in proper MLA format - Provide a properly cited works cited page.

Be sure that all documents: • are typed; • use 12 point font size; • use Times New Roman font; • are double-spaced; • follow MLA style requirements for all other formatting issues (see the Purdue OWL for guidelines); • have been spell-checked and edited for grammar and syntax problems; • are properly uploaded as a WORD .doc or .docx or .pdf file (you can download Microsoft word for free by using your Bellevue College sign in at the Microsoft webpage). ( Assignments not uploaded as a WORD DOC or DOCX or PDF file will receive a zero and be ignored. In other words, absolutely no txt, zip, .pages, or other files are acceptable. If you need help formatting, come see me during office hours). Your grade for this essay will depend on how well you addressed each issue above.

Writing Process: You will turn in two drafts of your essay. A “draft” means a completed draft that fulfills all the assignment criteria. Rough Draft: The rough draft should be a complete (about) 800 – 1,000 word essay that follows the assignment guidelines above. This draft should be printed and brought to class for peer review (see schedule) Final Draft: The Final Draft will be a polished, REVISED essay of 850 – 1,000 words that is posted in Canvas. Advice for students: To reach unengaged stakeholders, students—as rhetors—will select a target audience and focus their argument specifically on that group.

The success of this project is largely dependent upon knowing who the audience is, why they are unengaged, what can be done to get them to care about the issue, and how they can become involved. In both the formal essay and the website, the identity of the target audience should serve as a catalyst for the rhetorical choices that are made to create a persuasive argument. Project 3 brings the semester’s work to full circle. Students will use their understanding of the rhetorical situation to decide how to craft the most effective means of engaging their target audience. Credible evidence will be used to introduce the audience to current cultural conversations about the topic as a means of securing their investment in the issue.

Write a 3 pages essay on the subject below: P.S: - I already provided some resources for you to use while write the informative essay. - No difficult or complicated terms. Be simple and clear in your writing. - I provided my position on the matter, you can just write something based on my position statement. Informative essay thesis: Is the concept of multiculturalism a wise choice in modern day society? My position: I would say no because it’s generally viewed as a concept that helps to gather different cultures together while keeping their originality, … But that is not the reality that we are living. Multiculturalism led small countries to adopt the culture and habits of powerful nations, losing their originality; they brought division among people who didn’t want to adapt to foreign manners. Refer to: NON PEER-REVIEWED PEER-REVIEWED Cristina L. Lash. “Making Americans: Schooling, Diversity, and Assimilation in the Twenty-First Century.†RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences , vol. 4, no. 5, 2018, pp. 99–117. JSTOR , . Accessed 23 Nov. 2022. Granada-Cardona, Juan Sebastià¡n, and Richard Melman. “Alternatives for Latin American Integration: Beyond Racial Fusion and Multiculturalism.†Latin American Perspectives , vol. 45, no. 2, 2018, pp. 107–18. JSTOR , . Accessed 23 Nov. 2022. Ashcroft, Richard T., and Mark Bevir. “What Is Postwar Multiculturalism in Theory and Practice?†Multiculturalism in the British Commonwealth: Comparative Perspectives on Theory and Practice , edited by Richard T. Ashcroft and Mark Bevir, 1st ed., University of California Press, 2019, pp. 1–22. JSTOR , . Accessed 23 Nov. 2022.

Paper For Above instruction

Multiculturalism is often heralded as a progressive approach that encourages the coexistence of diverse cultures within a society. It is based on the idea that embracing different cultural identities can lead to a more inclusive and harmonious community. However, in reality, the implementation of multiculturalism in many modern societies reveals conflicting outcomes. While it promises to preserve individual cultural identities, it often results in cultural dilution, loss of national originality, and social division. This essay argues that multiculturalism, as it is currently practiced, is not a wise choice in modern society because it leads small nations to adopt the cultures of powerful nations, eroding their originality, and fostering division rather than unity.

The concept of multiculturalism originated as an ideal to promote mutual understanding and respect among different cultures. It was expected to elevate marginalized groups by acknowledging their unique contributions to society. Nevertheless, critics argue that this ideal has been compromised by political and economic forces that favor cultural homogenization. Cristina Lash (2018) discusses how the American educational system, while promoting diversity, inadvertently fosters cultural assimilation that dilutes original identities, especially among minority groups. Such policies often reflect a tension between maintaining cultural heritage and succumbing to dominant cultural pressures, which diminishes the diversity they intend to celebrate.

Moreover, multiculturalism in practice often encourages smaller countries or less powerful nations to adopt the cultural norms and habits of powerful nations. Juan Sebastián Granada-Cardona and Richard Melman (2018) highlight how Latin American countries, in their pursuit of economic development and global recognition, often succumb to adopting foreign cultural practices at the expense of their own traditions. This phenomenon results in a loss of cultural originality and identity. Instead of fostering genuine cultural exchange, multicultural policies sometimes become vehicles for cultural dominance by powerful nations, further marginalizing local traditions and histories.

Additionally, multiculturalism can contribute to social division among different cultural groups. While the idea is to celebrate diversity, it sometimes creates segregated communities where groups are isolated from one another. Ashcroft and Bevir (2019) analyze how postwar multiculturalism in the British Commonwealth has, in some instances, deepened social divides by emphasizing differences rather than commonalities. This division can lead to tensions, misunderstandings, and even conflict, undermining the goal of multiculturalism as a means to promote unity and mutual respect.

Furthermore, the assumption that multiculturalism automatically results in positive social harmony ignores the complexities of cultural integration. Personal experiences and certain research indicate that cultural differences can pose challenges to social cohesion. When groups retain their distinct identities without integration, it can hinder the development of a shared national identity, which is essential for social stability. As Lash (2018) points out, efforts to retain cultural identities sometimes lead to polarization rather than unity, especially when combined with economic disparities that accentuate social divides.

In conclusion, while multiculturalism aims to celebrate diversity and foster inclusion, its practical outcomes in contemporary society often conflict with these goals. It has led small nations to lose their unique cultural identities and has contributed to societal divisions. These issues suggest that multiculturalism, as it is currently implemented, may not be the best approach for fostering genuine social cohesion and cultural preservation. Instead, societies might benefit from emphasizing shared values and integration strategies that respect individual identities while promoting national unity and originality.

References

• Cristina L. Lash. “Making Americans: Schooling, Diversity, and Assimilation in the Twenty-First Century.” RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, 2018, pp. 99–117. JSTOR.
• Juan Sebastián Granada-Cardona, and Richard Melman. “Alternatives for Latin American Integration: Beyond Racial Fusion and Multiculturalism.” Latin American Perspectives, vol. 45, no. 2, 2018, pp. 107–18. JSTOR.
• Richard T. Ashcroft, and Mark Bevir. “What Is Postwar Multiculturalism in Theory and Practice?” Multiculturalism in the British Commonwealth: Comparative Perspectives on Theory and Practice, edited by Richard T. Ashcroft and Mark Bevir, 1st ed., University of California Press, 2019, pp. 1–22. JSTOR.
• Additional scholarly sources to be integrated as per researcher’s choice.