Provide An Example Of Tacit Knowledge And An Example 276527

Provide An Example Of Tacit Knowledge And An Example Of Expl

Provide an example of tacit knowledge and an example of explicit knowledge.

Tacit knowledge is personal, intuitive, and experience-based knowledge that is difficult to articulate or formalize. It resides within individuals and is often acquired through personal experience, intuition, and practice. An example of tacit knowledge is a master chef’s intuition about the perfect timing for flipping an omelette or adjusting seasoning, based on years of hands-on experience. This knowledge is difficult to communicate explicitly because it encompasses sensory perceptions, nuances, and skills that are developed over time and are often subconscious. Another example can be a veteran mechanic’s expertise in diagnosing complex engine problems through subtle cues that are not easily documented, relying heavily on their intuitive sense built from years of hands-on work.

In contrast, explicit knowledge is formal, codified, and easily articulated. It can be documented in manuals, procedures, databases, or reports. An example of explicit knowledge is a company's employee handbook detailing workplace policies or a technical manual describing how to operate specific machinery. Such knowledge is easily shared and transferred through written instructions, training programs, or digital resources. For instance, a software manual explaining step-by-step instructions for installing and configuring a program is explicit knowledge that can be easily communicated across an organization.

The distinction between tacit and explicit knowledge is crucial in knowledge management, where organizations seek to convert tacit knowledge into explicit formats to facilitate sharing and broader application (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995). Effective management of both types enhances organizational learning and innovation.

Paper For Above instruction

Reiterating, tacit knowledge is personal, intuitive, and often unarticulated, embodied in individuals’ experience and skills, exemplified by a master chef’s sense of timing or a veteran mechanic’s troubleshooting intuition. Explicit knowledge is codified, documented, and easily shared, such as user manuals and company policies. Both types are vital for organizational success; tacit knowledge enables innovation through personal expertise, while explicit knowledge supports standardized processes and training.

Understanding these distinctions allows organizations to develop strategies for capturing and transferring organizational knowledge effectively. For example, mentorship programs can help transfer tacit knowledge, while digital repositories safeguard explicit knowledge for accessible sharing across the organization (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995).

References

• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Bhappu, A. D., & Gopal, A. (2020). Managing Tacit Knowledge for Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 890-908.
• Penny, S. (2005). Explicit and Tacit Knowledge in Organizational Learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(2), 101-109.
• Stewart, T. A. (1997). Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. Currency/Doubleday.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of organizational marketing strategies, the ethical use of spam has often been considered intrusive and unethical. However, some legitimate organizations have found ways to leverage email spam techniques effectively and non-intrusively to promote their products or services. For example, a health supplements company might use targeted email campaigns to send valuable health tips along with promotional content to subscribers who have opted in or demonstrated interest in related products. This approach respects user consent and provides genuine value, thereby transforming what might be viewed as spam into a helpful communication. The key is in the targeting, content relevance, and ensuring recipients have agreed to receive such information, aligning with regulations like GDPR or CAN-SPAM Act (Laitin, 2004).

Another hypothetical scenario is a nonprofit organization employing what appears to be spam but is actually a well-designed, targeted outreach. It could send personalized messages to potential donors, highlighting their previous contributions or interests, with the purpose of engaging them further. These messages, if consented to and relevant, can increase engagement without being perceived as intrusive. The effectiveness of such a strategy hinges on the organization's transparency about their data use, providing opt-out options, and delivering value through relevant content. These practices turn the traditional view of spam on its head by focusing on consent and relevance, thereby making it effective and ethically sound (Nadkarni & Hofmann, 2012).

In conclusion, legitimate organizations can utilize email marketing tactics resembling spam in a nonintrusive, effective manner by ensuring targeted, relevant content, obtaining proper consent, and providing value to the recipients, thus maintaining a balance between promotional goals and ethical considerations.

Paper For Above instruction

References:

• Laitin, P. (2004). The CAN-SPAM act explained. Journal of Internet Law, 8(17), 3-7.
• Nadkarni, S., & Hofmann, P. (2012). A knowledge-based view of organizations: The influence of organizational knowledge management on organizational performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 263-278.
• Gordon, W., & Mencer, M. (2015). Ethical email marketing practices. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 370-385.
• Chittenden, F., & Sexton, M. (2006). Ethics and fundraising: A dynamic relationship. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(4), 223-231.
• Martin, K. (2017). Ethical marketing in the digital age. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 627-641.

Paper For Above instruction

Business intelligence (BI) refers to a set of technologies, applications, and practices for collecting, integrating, analyzing, and presenting business information to support better decision-making. BI encompasses data warehousing, data mining, online analytical processing (OLAP), and reporting tools that enable organizations to turn large volumes of data into actionable insights (Rouse, 2018). The ultimate goal of BI is to improve strategic, tactical, and operational decision-making within organizations, leading to increased efficiency and competitive advantage.

A real-world application of BI can be seen in retail companies like Walmart. Walmart employs extensive BI systems to analyze sales data, inventory levels, and customer purchasing patterns across its vast network of stores. By leveraging BI tools, Walmart optimizes inventory management, minimizes stockouts, and tailors marketing campaigns to regional preferences. For instance, by analyzing POS transaction data, Walmart can predict demand trends and adjust stock levels proactively, ensuring product availability while reducing excess inventory. Additionally, BI enables Walmart to identify high-performing products and declining ones, facilitating procurement decisions. This strategic use of BI enhances customer satisfaction through product availability and personalization, while also reducing costs and increasing sales (Sharma & Sushil, 2017).

Furthermore, BI systems enable predictive analytics, which forecast future market trends based on historical data. Retailers can utilize these insights for strategic planning, marketing campaigns, and supply chain optimization. As BI tools evolve, they increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to enhance predictive accuracy, making BI an indispensable part of modern business operations. Overall, BI empowers organizations like Walmart to remain agile and competitive in dynamic markets by providing timely, relevant, and actionable insights.

References

• Rouse, M. (2018). Business Intelligence (BI): What it is and why it matters. TechTarget. https://searchbusinessanalytics.techtarget.com/definition/business-intelligence
• Sharma, R., & Sushil. (2017). Business intelligence in retail: A case study of Walmart. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(11), 1174-1191.
• Thuraisingham, M. (2018). Data Analytics, Data Mining, and Business Intelligence: A Managerial Perspective. CRC Press.
• Chaudhuri, S., & Dayal, U. (1997). An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. ACM Sigmod Record, 26(1), 65-74.
• Negash, S. (2004). Business intelligence review. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 73–78.
• Watson, H. J., & Wixom, B. H. (2007). The current state of business intelligence. Computer, 40(9), 96-99.
• Laursen, G. H., & Thorlund, J. (2017). Business Analytics for Managers: Taking Action Using Data. Wiley.
• Imhoff, C., & Geiger, S. (2013). Business Intelligence: The Savvy Manager's Guide. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Popovič, A., Hackney, R., & Jaklič, J. (2018). Understanding Business Intelligence and Analytics Use in Organizations. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(2), 201-218.
• Choi, T. M., Varian, H., & Thakor, A. (2017). Business Analytics: The Science of Data-Driven Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 87-95.