Purpose Of Assignment Students Will Have The Opportunity To

Purpose Of Assignmentstudents Will Have The Opportunity To Analyze And

Students will have the opportunity to analyze and critique other team members' submissions from the previous week's assignment. The team feedback will allow all team members to improve their Week 2 assignments in preparation for their final strategic plan.

Discuss drafts of your Business Model and Strategic Plan, Part I Individual assignment from Week 2 with all team members. Choose two or three team member's drafts and review as a team this week. You will review a different team member's drafts each week.

By Week 5, all team members' papers should have been reviewed at least once. Propose detailed feedback and critical analysis team members can incorporate into their drafts. Prepare a maximum 700-word synopsis summarizing what the team has learned from the review and discussion. Please make sure to include specific recommendations for each of the submitted papers.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves a collaborative review process where students analyze and critique each other's drafts of the Business Model and Strategic Plan, Part I, from Week 2. This peer review mechanism is designed to foster iterative improvement by providing constructive feedback that can be integrated into subsequent drafts. The process emphasizes critical thinking, detailed analysis, and actionable recommendations, ultimately enhancing the quality of each student’s strategic plan in preparation for the final submission.

Effective peer review requires students to engage attentively with each other's work, identifying strengths and areas for improvement. Students should evaluate the clarity and coherence of the business model, the robustness of strategic objectives, and the alignment of activities with the overall strategic vision. Constructive feedback should be specific, pointing out particular issues or strengths, and suggesting concrete steps for refinement.

A key component of this assignment is the synthesis of insights gained from the review process. By Week 5, each student must submit a 700-word synopsis summarizing the collective learning outcomes from the reviews and discussions. This summary should highlight recurring themes, common challenges, and diverse perspectives shared among team members. Additionally, students should provide detailed recommendations tailored to each draft, emphasizing clarity in strategic messaging, feasibility of business models, and depth of analysis.

This peer review process not only improves individual drafts but also cultivates critical teamwork skills, such as providing and receiving constructive feedback, supporting continuous improvement, and engaging in collaborative problem-solving. Ultimately, this exercise prepares students to develop more comprehensive and strategic business plans, fostering an understanding of iterative development and the importance of adaptive planning in strategic management.

References

• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
• Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Harvard Business Review, 72(1), 107-114.
• Grant, R. M. (2019). Contemporary Strategy Analysis (10th ed.). Wiley.
• Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases. Pearson Education.
• Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
• Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
• Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354-363.